Skip to content

Ned Lamont to join us for Drinking Liberally

We just got word that Ned Lamont will be joining us Southeastern Connecticut Liberal Drinkers at our next get together. This is a chance for all of you folks who have thought about coming, but never quite made it, to come join us and meet the man who is the current front runner for the gubernatorial nomination and, we can only hope, the front runner to be our next governor.

Whatever your preferences for the nomination, Ned is a guy to whom we all owe a lot. He stepped up to the plate when the established politicians were too scared to do so. He exposed Lieberman for what he is, and he showed the Democrats nationwide that they could win be taking on Bush’s war, rather than running for cover. He deserves consideration now, though it’s a mystery why anyone would want what has to be a thankless job for anyone who actually tries to tackle the problems he will face as governor.

Come join us at the Bulkeley House, 6:30 pm, 111 Bank Street, New London. Mark your calendar now!

CORRECTION: D’oh! It’s hard to mark your calendar if I don’t give the date: Thursday, February 4th.


Capuano moves to muzzle the corporations

An intrepid young reporter at the Boston Globe (who shall go unnamed, but whose last name rhymes, and more, with mine) informs us that US Representative Michael E. Capuano (who in retrospect should have been nominated for the Senate) has come up with a nifty way to all but nullify the recent court ruling handing the country over to the corporations. Taking his cue from the court’s “logic” that a corporation is merely an association of individuals, who therefore have a collective right to speak, he would require the corporation to get the consent of those individuals before it could do any speaking.

US Representative Michael E. Capuano is proposing to limit the impact of a Supreme Court decision on campaign financing by requiring companies to seek shareholder approval for most political donations.

“The money belongs to the shareholders,’’ said Capuano, a Somerville Democrat. “Let them make that decision.’’

The court’s ruling last week struck down decades-old restrictions on corporate money in politics, sparking outrage among advocates for tighter campaign finance rules and a rare rebuke of the court from President Obama during his State of the Union address. Capuano’s legislation would make it more difficult for companies to greatly expand their political activity.

The legislation would apply to any corporate donation of more than $10,000. Executives would have to convene a shareholder vote to get permission to spend such money for any political purposes. It would also require companies to report such expenditures quarterly to shareholders.

The devil is in the details in these things. The legislation must be crafted to prevent the possibility of a shareholder resolution giving the directors prospective carte blanche to spend money as they see fit. It has to require them to get authority for each and every proposed expenditure greater than $10,000.00, otherwise it is mere window dressing and a sham.

It will be interesting to see how the court would go about finding that sort of requirement unconstitutional, something it will surely want to do. Corporations are creatures of statute, and, at least up to now, the way in which they are organized and run internally are subject to statutory regulation. They are supposed to be run for the benefit of the shareholders, but to paraphrase John Yoo, that view has become somewhat quaint, given the way the profits are distributed these days. Still, in theory, a corporation is an association of stockholders, not CEOs, so it’s going to take all the originalist legal thinking Roberts can muster for him to unshackle his friends from the law Capuano is proposing.


Friday Night Music-John Prine

This is getting progressively more difficult, though it’s amazing how much good stuff you can dig up with roots to the bygone era in which I grew up, musically speaking (if nothing else).

If you have a smartphone, such as an Iphone, I highly recommend that you download Pandora, a free music delivery program. You can pick an artist, say Bob Dylan, and it will create a channel featuring Bob Dylan and other people who are like Bob Dylan, in some way shape or form. Given Dylan’s permutations, it’s hard to see who wouldn’t get swept in, and indeed, the selections have been pretty eclectic. That’s how I came up with tonight’s choice, both as to artist and song. Unfortunately, this is the best version I could find on youtube. The audio is not great, and it’s a bit out of sync, but what can you do?

And as a bonus, here’s Norah Jones and company doing the same song. The fellow to her right is Richard Julian, who has released at least two albums on his own, and, now that I’m reminded, I must put on my list to feature one of these weeks.


Acorn redux

The recent arrest of James O’Keefe, for “masterminding” a sixth rate break in at Mary Landrieu’s office, reminds us once again of his original claim to fame, the famous “sting” he allegedly pulled off to expose Acorn’s nefarious doings. You may recall that he and a female right winger posed as a pimp and his prostitute, he all duded out in pimp togs, seeking and getting advice on ways to carry out their business without paying taxes. Added to the mix, they allegedly got advice on how to get away with promoting the prostitution of minors.

At the time the media was taken to task for failing to expose Acorn’s failings themselves, and of course, the version of events that I’ve set forth above has become as fixed a media meme as Al Gore’s alleged claim that he invented the internet. This McClatchy article, published today, repeats the story:

O’Keefe, the Internet “journalist” who became an overnight sensation after his undercover reports revealed unethical behavior by the liberal activist group ACORN, now finds himself in the middle of his own bugging scandal.

The real media failing, as usual, was its willingness to believe a right wing lie, even one spread by a smarmy 24 year old, without bothering to look into it at all. For like the Gore meme, there is precious little truth in this one.

Turns out that O’Keefe never posed as a pimp; he posed as the boyfriend of a girl who was trying to escape her pimp. He never wore those duds during the sting, only for his star turns at Fox. Turns out also that no one ever advised the pair not to pay taxes. They were told to pay, and how to do so. You can read a full analysis here.

But, as Bob Dylan once said, now’s not the time for your tears. To get to that point, we must once again look to the Democrats, who, within days, fell all over themselves to vote for a Republican sponsored bill to deprive Acorn of all federal funding, including that already committed. (The bill, signed by profile in courage Barack Obama, has been stayed by preliminary injunction as a bill of attainder.) Did the Democrats hold hearings to hear Acorn’s side? Of course not. Why do that when you have the word of a 24 year old, costume wearing, Fox adored Republican (perhaps the lowest life form on the planet) and skillfully edited film to boot? Acorn was serving their constituency, it was registering their voters, and it was entitled at least to its day in court, but the Democrats didn’t think twice about throwing Acorn under the bus. This was a repeat of the shameful way in which the Democrats did the same thing to Moveon after the Patreaus ad, and I’m sorry to say that every single Connecticut Congressman went along with the lynching.

Well, I have to go. I have to check my email to see how many messages I got from the Democratic National Committee, or the DCCC, or the DSC, asking for my money to help them fight the Republicans.


Wow! Sanity in Kansas

From McClatchy:

After 37 minutes of deliberation, a jury today found Scott Roeder guilty of first-degree murder in the shooting death of Wichita abortion doctor George Tiller.

The judge let him testify about his anti-abortion beliefs, but apparently the jury wasn’t buying.


I still want one


Name that Ice Cream!

Unbeknownst to me, I have become a member of the media, and as such I received an emailed press release from the Farmer’s Cow, which will soon be releasing a line of locally made ice creams. Since I love ice cream, and since I approve of local foods, I thought I’d pass it along, despite the fact that it has nothing to do with politics. Without further ado:

THE FARMER’S COW HOLDS NAMING CONTEST FOR NEW ICE CREAM LINE
Lebanon, Connecticut, January 27, 2010 – The Farmer’s Cow, local dairy farmers providing Connecticut-produced fresh milk, cream and other products, is inviting area residents to help name the flavors in their own locally-made ice cream. There are ten different flavors to name and one lucky entrant will win a summer’s supply of ice cream.
“We’re very excited about our upcoming ice cream line,” says Robin Chesmer, managing partner with The Farmer’s Cow. “The cream and milk for the ice cream will come straight from our farms and the ice cream will be made right here in Connecticut. Our goal is to make a rich and creamy treat, which is the freshest you can buy.”

The ten flavors that need names are:

· Vanilla
· Chocolate
· Chocolate Chocolate Chip
· Mint Chocolate Chip
· Strawberry
· Cookies & Cream
· Black Raspberry Chocolate Chip
· Peanut Butter Cup
· Cherry Vanilla
· Coffee

“The flavor choices were narrowed down by those who responded to a survey conducted on our website and at our appearances throughout Connecticut in 2009,” says Chesmer. “The response was so positive that we want to further include our fans in this fun, exciting product launch. We’re hoping even more people will put their creativity to work and come up with some great names.”

Names will be accepted during a two-week period from February 1 until midnight on February 14 at www.thefarmerscow.com/icecream. All entries will be reviewed by the farmers at The Farmer’s Cow and considered as names for the flavors. One lucky entrant will receive a summer’s supply of ice cream beginning on Memorial Day and lasting until Labor Day.
“All of the naming guidelines and rules are on our website,” says Chesmer. “We’ll announce the winners at the end of February. Our first ice cream will be available for your purchase by Memorial Day.”

About The Farmer’s Cow

The Farmer’s Cow is a group of six Connecticut dairy farms that produces fresh, hormone-free milk, half & half, and heavy cream for Southern New England. They also sell Connecticut-sourced, all-natural eggs, apple cider, seasonal beverages, and coming soon – ice cream. The Farmer’s Cow products are available throughout Connecticut and are available at most major grocery stores and many independent markets. For more information visit www.TheFarmersCow.com or call (866) 355-COWS.

Let me add that while I approve of this endeavor, I wholly disapprove of their flavor selection, as just about all of my favorites are missing. However, if you don’t vote, you can’t complain, and I have to admit that I didn’t exercise my franchise when they were picking the flavors.


Denise Merrill comes to New London

Last night we attended a fundraiser for the House Democrats at the Thames Club, in downtown New London. Denise Merrill, House Majority Leader, spoke to the assembled multitude. She is among those trying to take advantage of the falling dominoes, what with Richard Blumenthal heading to the Senate. She is going to run for Secretary of State.

Truth be told, if the actual members of the House had been subtracted from the attendees, the place would have been somewhat empty. From left to right: Betsy Ritter, Elissa Wright, Diana Urban, Tom Reynolds, Denise Merrill, Ken Ryan, Melissa Olson, and Ed Jutila.

Our Drinking Liberally Group was well represented. I did not take this picture, but am glad to report that the person who did managed to keep me well hidden.


Senate turns down a stupid idea.

A stopped clock is right twice a day, which is about 100 times more frequently than the United States Senate, which today did the right thing and turned down the “deficit reduction” commission, the brainchild (the child has been adopted by Obama, I’m sorry to say) of the people who believe in tax cuts for the wealthy and the destruction of social security for the rest of us.

Kudos to Chris Dodd, who voted against it. The roll call is here. One nice thing, I suppose, about not seeking re-election is that it frees one up to vote right, if that is one’s wish. The vote was 53-47 for the commission, but of course in today’s topsy turvy Senate world, it takes 60 votes to pass anything. It would be interesting to know how many of those “yes” votes were cover-your-ass votes.

I’m not sure what is more shameful: The Senate’s chronic dysfunction and inability to exercise its constitutional function, or the craven desire on the part of so many Senators to off-load their constitutional function so someone else can take the heat for making decisions they are supposed to make.


Rush fesses up

(Via Atrios) You really must read this column from the Onion.