Skip to content

Restoring Sanity


Mean spirited, bad policy and bad politics. What could go wrong?

Some time ago Tom Tomorrow released a cartoon in which he speculated that Bush and Cheney, et. al., were actually aging 60s radicals who had plotted for years to get elected as right wing Republicans and screw everthing up, guaranteeing that the Democrats could take over and fulfill their radical agenda. The only problem, in the cartoon, was that it turned out that Obama was leading a similar conspiracy from the right.

Sometimes, I wonder whether there wasn’t more than a grain of truth in that cartoon. Witness today’s announcement that Obama will unilaterally freeze the pay of 2,000,000 federal workers, thus giving the Republicans a) something they very much want anyway, and b) 2,000,000 votes (more if you count family and friends) they might otherwise never have gotten. All this in the name of making “tough choices” and taming the deficit, based on the fantasy that the economy has turned around and that it’s time to tackle the structural deficit instead of further stimulating the economy. It is, of course, irrelevant in this nation, at this time, given the level of our discourse, that the structural deficit is a function of health care costs, and that Obama’s tough choice will simply hurt two million people while doing precisely nothing to affect long term deficits and while it further decreases the demand that the economy needs to recover in real life as opposed to the Obama Administration’s fantasy world.

In return for throwing 2,000,000 people under the bus, Obama got what he always gets in negotiations with the Republicans: nothing. Only this time, he didn’t even try to get anything. He gave them this bone for free. They will now proceed to get him to make another “tough choice”: tax breaks for the rich in amounts that make the money saved by screwing federal workers look like peanuts.

If Obama and his crew are really plotting to hand the country over to Sarah Palin, then they’re brilliant. But if they’re not-if Tom Tomorrow was wrong- then we’re seeing political malpractice on an unprecedented scale.


Friday Night Music-Johnny Rivers

Johnny Rivers made his name covering Chuck Berry songs, which he did skillfully enough. Sometime around 1965 he could be heard singing the theme song to a TV series imported from Britain, which was called Danger Man over there, but Secret Agent here. That series, starring Patrick McGoohan, was followed by the cult classic The Prisoner, in which the Secret Agent, still played by McGoohan, was confined in The Village, as a result of his decision to leave the world of Secret Agentry for reasons never explained, either to the proprietors of the Village (that is, in fact, their chief demand of the prisoner) or to the viewer. As the wikipedia entry on the song points out, “the lyric “They’ve given you a number and taken away your name” appears to anticipate The Prisoner“, since everyone in the Village is, indeed, assigned a number and relieved of their names, McGoohan becoming “Number Six”.

The song was written by Steve Barri and P. F. Sloan, the latter of whom wrote the seminal Eve of Destruction. At least as I remember it, it took a while for the song to be released as a single after the show began playing here in the U.S.

Rivers went on to record a song called Come Home, America in 1972, which was no more than a middling hit, but for which he should be forever honored, as it was inspired by George McGovern’s acceptance speech at that year’s Democratic National Convention.


For this we can give thanks

It’s been dismal lately, but just before Thanksgiving we got a bit of news that gave us a little in the way of political good cheer. Tom Delay was convicted of money laundering by a Texas jury, in a case that seemed to defy the constitutional mandate for a speedy trial. Seems like he was indicted in the dim and distant past. In a way, he was, because the core of the case centered on a Texas law that forbade corporations from contributing directly to political campaigns. That particular prohibitions seems quaint, in light of the Supreme Court’s Citizen United opinion.

Still, for what it’s worth, the country may eventually be protected from Delay’s political machinations, not to mention that he will be unable to inflict his dancing on a helpless nation.

It’s not much, given the truly bad news this month has brought, but it’s something, and it came just in time. I wonder, by the way, if Fox News saw fit to mention it.

Finally

IOS 4.2 is finally here. I know this means nothing to you non-Ipad owners, but for those who do own the fabled tablet, this update is supposed to bring eternal happiness, along with 100 new features, though when they’re listed, they always seem to peter out at about 10.

I’ll be fooling around with it for the rest of the evening. Verdict so far: Folders are handy. Airplay is great, but seems to skip out spontaneously for no particular reason. Nice to have multi-tasking. The printing capabilities are far less than originally advertised. I’m not about to go out and buy a special printer just for my Ipad, at least I hope I won’t.


Forgotten again

I don’t know whether the NAACP’s complaints about Malloy’s transition team are valid, but as a Southeastern Connecticut transplant, I feel I must point out that, as near as I can see, Nancy Wyman hails from about as far to the east as anyone on the team, and Malloy really couldn’t not put her on the team.

It’s not surprising that we to the east have been forgotten once again. We might, were we so minded, take some measure of pride in the fact that we evoke a certain measure of bi-partisanship: Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, all ignore us.

The sad fact is that there are substantial differences between our part of the state, and that part that shades over into Yankee territory. There’s a whole different culture here, and we do deserve some measure of representation. After all, we vote and pay taxes.


Spreading Memes

Paul Krugman comments on the fact that Obama has bought in to a right wing meme intended to discredit FDR. The argument they make is that FDR delayed taking action to deal with the Depression for six months, in order to build political support for the actions he eventually did take.

There’s no truth to the argument. The six months (actually 4 months, but right wingers aren’t very good at math either) in question is the period between his election and his inauguration, which was in March, not in January as it is now. During that time FDR refused to endorse and agree to stand by Hoover’s policies, which were not working, and which would not ever have worked. This meme ignores the hectic pace of the first 100 days (made possible, in part, by the fact that it only took 50 days to pass something in the Senate in those days of yore.) that I thought we all learned about in history class, but which Obama has somehow forgotten under the spell of some right wing revisionists.

It’s truly distressing that Obama has bought into this particular meme, as he has also bought in to the Reagan as great president meme. It’s particularly disheartening because in this particular case it’s rather gratuitous, as he apparently didn’t bother to check his facts. More disheartening, however, is that Obama is relying for advice on precisely the folks, the bankers and the financiers, to whom Hoover was listening and to whose orders FDR refused to march.

Obama has been pretty good about trying to reconcile the Federal government to scientific facts, but he’s not been terribly good about reconciling it with historical fact. If he’s not trying, in vain of course, to assuage the right by ignoring the roots of our current problems, he’s buying in to their skewed version of the past.

It’s dangerous to deny scientifically proven facts. It’s also dangerous to deny historical fact. Sometimes fake history becomes accepted as fact, becomes myth, and perhaps, does no terrible harm, depending on the myth. It probably does no harm if people believe George Washington couldn’t tell a lie, though even that is debatable. It does do real harm, however, if we fail to learn the lessons of the past, since, as the saying goes, we are then doomed to repeat them. The Depression is the time in the recent past most obviously comparable to today. If we misinterpret that time, then we risk the same failures. Unfortunately, we’re doing worse than FDR, since we have not repeated his successes, but we seem intent on repeating his mistakes (see, e.g., attempts to balance the budget in 1936). Besides the obvious fact that we have not repeated the job creation programs he created, we have not strengthened the working person’s rights, as FDR did, we have not passed legislation truly designed to avoid a repetition of the abuses that got us here, as FDR did, and Obama has not, as FDR did, provided a counterweight to the charlatans on the right (see, e.g., Father Coughlin/Glenn Beck), to which lack of leadership we owe the right’s ability to manipulate the fear inspired “tea party” people. It would help, as well, if one got the sense that there was a sense of urgency about the economic situation in Washington, but I don’t see it. I wasn’t around then, but I really don’t think Roosevelt spent much time worrying about government programs that might possibly run into small financial problems in 1965, rather than the millions of unemployed in 1932.

I always believed that Obama’s reelection was a sure thing, given the Republican field and the right wing crazies that have captured that party. I’m beginning to doubt that belief. Obama seems weirdly detached from the facts on the ground, unwilling to forcefully make a case for anything, unwilling to stand up for any principle, and unwilling to stray too far from the advice he gets from the people who got us into our current mess. It doesn’t help that he is willing to buy into right wing memes about the greatest Democratic president in the history of the party, particularly because it appears he actually believes this particular meme, and was not merely repeating it in yet another doomed attempt to curry favor with the Republicans.

Friday Night Music-Sir Douglas

The Sir Douglas Quintet consisted of a bunch of Texans who picked a British sounding name to try to ride the wave, so to speak. According to Wikipedia they had three reasonably good selling singles, but I only remember this one, She’s About a Mover, making them one hit wonders in my book, at least. Lead singer and band eponym Doug Sahm went on to carve out a fairly illustrious career, however.


John Oliver comes calling

Consistent with Jon Stewart’s evenly-spread-the-blame call for civility, the Daily Show has come to Southeastern Connecticut to report on the recent actually civil campaign between Democrat Andy Maynard and RINO (and I write that with deep respect) Stuart Norman.

This is the first time the Daily Show has visited our neck of the woods since some atheists tried, successfully I think, to stop Jewett City from mixing church and state in a matter involving a bell tower.

Now, Maynard and Norman’s willingness to participate in this proves something else about these guys. Not only were they able to be civil to one another and treat the voters with respect, they are also either unbelievably brave or unbelievably foolish. Take your pick. I’m assuming that the Stewart folks will try to make them look good, if for no other reason that to advance Stewart’s meme, but I’ve watched a lot of Daily Shows, and I’ve come to the conclusion that they’re not very good at making their victims look good, even when they seem to want to.

For what it’s worth, both Norman and Maynard deserve the recognition. Wouldn’t it be nice if every campaign was run like theirs-an honest exchange of views.

We can all look forward to seeing Andy and Stu on television, along, I’m told, with some of our friends and neighbors who were interviewed for the show. I’ll be posting it here, once it’s aired. I would like to add that I think it’s a shame that they didn’t think to get the take of local political bloggers (of which, come to think of it, I am the lone example) on the subject.

We have all been here before

Why do they even bother?

The New York Times reports that Harry Reid is once again promising to bring DADT repeal to the Senate floor.

Is there any sentient being out there who doesn’t already know that Reid will meekly forget the whole thing once the Republicans use their minority to block the bill? Is there any sentient being who thinks that either Reid or Obama will put any pressure on the Republicans, or attempt to frame the debate in any way, shape or form to try to actually get the measure to a vote? Why even bother. They make such a pitiful gesture out of the whole thing that they just end up alienating the people they are supposedly trying to help, and reinforce the Republican’s confidence that they are calling the shots.

This is a bit like Charlie Brown telling everyone he sees that he just had a great idea: he’s going to ask Lucy to hold the football for him.

I’d much rather hear Reid say that he’s going to change the rules come January. We might as well face facts on DADT and just about everything else. The Democrats have successfully allowed the Republicans to call the shots. The best Obama can hope for in the next two years is to get his appointees and his judges confirmed, and he can’t do that unless the Senate changes its rules.