Periodically my friend Bob Roth contributes a piece of writing. As they are normally much longer than a typical post, I have usually placed them on a separate page, to be forever enshrined as a link on the upper right hand side of the blog. Recently Bob sent me another, in which I think he makes some good points. Unfortunately, I wouldn’t hold my breath waiting for the folks in our current Congress to take many of the steps Bob’s advocating, or even think about some of the issues he’s raising, but the more they’re discussed the more chance there is that some of them will seep into the debate. You can read the full piece by clicking on the link at the right, or by reading below and following the link at the bottom.<\/p>\n
So what follows is Bob’s latest effort.<\/p>\n
A New Political Economy 101 <\/em><\/p>\n What\u2019s an Economy For, Anyway?<\/p>\n By ROBERT ROTH<\/p>\n It seems to me we need a whole new economy. And to get one we need, as always, understanding, organizing, action. This article gropes toward understanding what an economy is and could be in the context of our present, multi-faceted dilemma, in the hope of facilitating organizing and appropriate action. <\/p>\n The economy \u2013 by definition, right? \u2013 is that matrix or network of institutions and interactions that meet human needs. Or, is it only about how human needs are met by means of transactions that involve money? Is the economy only about what is bought and sold? If so, what about barter, the exchange of goods and services? What about caring and caring activities that are not valued in the present economy? Where do we draw the lines?<\/p>\n I have thought for years of the economy as the sum total of goods and services exchanged for money. That\u2019s what the Gross National Product is all about, and that\u2019s how it\u2019s measured, right? And the Quest of the Day (and perhaps the Decade) is how we\u2019re going to \u201cjump start\u201d the economy. At present \u201cthe economy\u201d is winding down, contracting, with unemployment rising by the hour thereby further decreasing demand for goods and services thus leading to further contraction. <\/p>\n But the idea that we can jump start the economy implies that what we were doing before the crisis began is capable of being continued, of going on as before. The idea that we should jump start it \u2013 by any means necessary, it would seem — assumes its operation is critical to our health and welfare, essential to our wellbeing and even survival.<\/p>\n As things now stand, leaving increasing numbers of people without money certainly threatens those people\u2019s health, wellbeing and ultimately, survival. Granted, the Obama administration seems to be making an effort to integrate into the \u201cstimulus package\u201d a great many worthwhile activities, that will produce immediate or even lasting value. But the bulk of it, including the tax cuts, is intended simply to get the economy \u201cgoing again,\u201d in the same direction it had before the crisis. This will use up increasingly scarce resources on what may well be a fool\u2019s errand. So maybe now is a good time to ask whether the economy we had, which is now contracting, can or should be revived. <\/p>\n