{"id":3513,"date":"2010-01-18T14:28:05","date_gmt":"2010-01-18T19:28:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/?p=3513"},"modified":"2010-01-18T14:28:09","modified_gmt":"2010-01-18T19:28:09","slug":"obamas-tax","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/?p=3513","title":{"rendered":"Obama&#8217;s Tax"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"clear: both\">The Big Banks are weighing a constitutional challenge to the tax that Obama is proposing to impose, to recover the government&#8217;s bailout costs. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/01\/18\/business\/18bank.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss\">According to experts consulted by the New York Times<\/a> the legal theory behind the challenge is &#8220;dubious&#8221;:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"clear: both\">\n<p>[The Bank&#8217;s] primary argument, however, might be that a tax so narrowly focused would penalize a specific group. Legal scholars say the Supreme Court has overturned only a handful of laws on those grounds, and those were typically rules that singled out political outcasts like former members of the Confederacy or people accused of being communists.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"clear: both\">The article fails to account for the overriding fact that we are encumbered with a Supreme Court that has a disdain for precedent and a fealty to corporations unlike any court since the early 20th century. John Roberts was appointed not for his socially conservative positions, but for his steadfast support for the American corporation, a support that increases in proportion to the size of the corporation Alito ditto. There&#8217;s every reason to believe that the court, as presently constituted, would reach out to use this case as a way to serve its corporate masters and push us back toward the 18th century, where they think we belong.<\/p>\n<p style=\"clear: both\">It happens that the tax is probably the wrong tax for Obama to propose. It would make more sense to pass a transaction tax, a tiny tax on each sale of securities that would have little effect on those of us who buy and sell stock for the long haul, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/01\/13\/opinion\/13herbert.html?_r=1&#038;pagewanted=print\">but would have a huge and salutary effect on speculators<\/a>. Still, the proposed tax is better than nothing.<\/p>\n<p style=\"clear: both\">Whether its the best policy, it is good politics. Consider this, also from the Times:<\/p>\n<blockquote style=\"clear: both\">\n<p>Republicans have remained unusually silent on the tax, hoping to avoid a choice between supporting a tax increase and defending big bankers.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"clear: both\">Yes, indeed. As Jesus said, you can&#8217;t serve two masters, and this would give us a great opportunity to see which master, the tea partiers or the bankers, means the most to the Republicans. My prediction: the Republicans have become so inflexibly negative that they will ultimately oppose this bill out of pure instinct. Now, if they can only get Baucus, Nelson and the other <em>so called<\/em> Democrats to get out of the way, the real Democrats might have a chance to salvage the elections in November.<\/p>\n<p><br class=\"final-break\" style=\"clear: both\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Big Banks are weighing a constitutional challenge to the tax that Obama is proposing to impose, to recover the government&#8217;s bailout costs. According to experts consulted by the New York Times the legal theory behind the challenge is &#8220;dubious&#8221;: [The Bank&#8217;s] primary argument, however, might be that a tax so narrowly focused would penalize [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3513","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3513","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3513"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3513\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3514,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3513\/revisions\/3514"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}