{"id":816,"date":"2008-03-30T13:24:50","date_gmt":"2008-03-30T18:24:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/?p=816"},"modified":"2008-03-30T13:24:50","modified_gmt":"2008-03-30T18:24:50","slug":"zbigniew-brzezinski-calls-for-an-exit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/?p=816","title":{"rendered":"Zbigniew Brzezinski calls for an exit"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

The Washington Post runs against type today and gives some space to Zbigniew Brzezinski, who has opposed the Iraq war from the start.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Nothing he says is much different than you can read, for instance, at Juan Cole\u2019s Informed Comment<\/a> every day, but it\u2019s important that it appears in the pages of a paper that helped mightily to get us into this quagmire, and has regularly given a platform to those who have been so often wrong about this conflict. Here\u2019s a bit of what Brezinski has to say:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Contrary to Republican claims that our departure will mean calamity, a sensibly conducted disengagement will actually make Iraq more stable over the long term. The impasse in Shiite-Sunni relations is in large part the sour byproduct of the destructive U.S. occupation, which breeds Iraqi dependency even as it shatters Iraqi society. In this context, so highly reminiscent of the British colonial era, the longer we stay in Iraq, the less incentive various contending groups will have to compromise and the more reason simply to sit back. A serious dialogue with the Iraqi leaders about the forthcoming U.S. disengagement would shake them out of their stupor.<\/p>\n

Ending the U.S. war effort entails some risks, of course, but they are inescapable at this late date. Parts of Iraq are already self-governing, including Kurdistan<\/span><\/a>, part of the Shiite south and some tribal areas in the Sunni center. U.S. military<\/span><\/a> disengagement will accelerate Iraqi competition to more effectively control their territory, which may produce a phase of intensified inter-Iraqi conflicts. But that hazard is the unavoidable consequence of the prolonged U.S. occupation. The longer it lasts, the more difficult it will be for a viable Iraqi state ever to reemerge.<\/p>\n

It is also important to recognize that most of the anti-U.S. insurgency in Iraq has not been inspired by al-Qaeda<\/span><\/a>. Locally based jihadist groups have gained strength only insofar as they have been able to identify themselves with the fight against a hated foreign occupier. As the occupation winds down and Iraqis take responsibility for internal security, al-Qaeda in Iraq will be left more isolated and less able to sustain itself. The end of the occupation will thus be a boon for the war on al-Qaeda, bringing to an end a misguided adventure that not only precipitated the appearance of al-Qaeda in Iraq but also diverted the United States from Afghanistan<\/span><\/a>, where the original al-Qaeda threat grew and still persists.<\/p>\n

Speaking of Juan Cole, today<\/a> he reports that Iran is calling for an end to the violence. He also, again, points out something that is not often mentioned in our stateside reporting, but is widely recognized overseas: the U.S. is backing the Shiite party that is most closely aligned to Iran (see, Axis of Evil):<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

The Iranian foreign ministry called Saturday for an end to the fighting<\/a>, saying that it strengthens the US hand in Iraq and may have the consequence of prolonging the US presence. Iran tends to back the Da’wa Party of Iraqi PM Nuri al-Maliki, and the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq of Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, so it is significant that Tehran is criticizing this push by those two to destroy the Sadr Movement. I take them at their word. They are genuinely afraid that al-Maliki’s poorly conceived campaign will backfire and that Bush will use it to insist on keeping troops in Iraq.<\/p>\n

\n [From Zbigniew Brzezinski calls for an exit<\/cite><\/a>]\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Washington Post runs against type today and gives some space to Zbigniew Brzezinski, who has opposed the Iraq war from the start. Nothing he says is much different than you can read, for instance, at Juan Cole\u2019s Informed Comment every day, but it\u2019s important that it appears in the pages of a paper that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-816","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-iraq"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/816","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=816"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/816\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=816"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=816"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ctblueblog.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=816"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}