Skip to content

Meandering

A few observations about the campaign, and it is entirely coincidental that I am linking to a couple of stories from the Globe written by an excellent young reporter who shares my last name and half my genes.

And it really is coincidental, sort of.

First, a lot has been written about Romney’s lack of…how shall I put it? Charisma? Star power? Resemblance to an actual human being?

But it turns out that Romney has just as much charisma, just as much ability to inspire almost cult like devotion as Obama. It just turns out that it is extremely concentrated:

Jim Wilson, who can make a reasonable claim to be Mitt Romney’s most ardent fan, is back.

Three months after a mysterious fire destroyed the truck covered with Romney signs and American flags that Wilson had driven across the nation, the 70-year-old Army veteran pulled into a Paul Ryan rally in northwest Ohio on Monday, showing off the new wheels.

“It’s kind of like steering a sailboat in a gale. It has fins and wings but no rudder,” he said of the vehicle. Counting both trucks, Wilson estimates he has now driven 140,000 miles and been to 42 states to support Romney.

Now, I suppose it’s possible, were you a Republican, to make a case that you should vote for Romney, though the evidence for that proposition is pretty thin on the ground, but until today, I had been unaware that there was anyone who actually wanted to vote for Romney. I’m not too surprised, however. I represent disabled people, and I’ve long since learned that there are all different kinds of mental illness. Wilson’s variety is probably fairly harmless, since it doesn’t appear to be infectious.

Meanwhile, on the campaign trail, the Republicans have taken to bashing China. It’s not something new to politics, but I would hazard a guess that never in American history has a party had to hide its agenda so much that it was forced to lie about its positions on almost every issue. If we were to believe their protestations, where would the Medicare hating, outsource loving, immigrant loathing cretins on the right turn for solace? Of course, they know very well that it’s all for show, so they have no trouble sticking with their guys. In the case of China we’ve got Paul Ryan decrying the loss of manufacturing jobs to China (course he doesn’t mention that his Number 1 man sent a lot of them there all by himself). But the tell comes at the end of the story, when someone in the crowd had the temerity (or, if a true fan, cluelessness) to ask if Ryan would actually do something substantive should he and Willard get in:

When one woman mentioned her employer had closed, and asked if it would be possible to penalize companies that transferred jobs to China, Ryan sidestepped the question.

Finally, I pointed out a while back that the Republicans have long since realized that you don’t need to fool all of the people all of the time, you only have to fool most of the people at election time. But what happens when you can’t even pull that off? Well, apparently the solution is to fool yourselves. Republicans are taking denialism to a new level. They deny science in order to fool most of the people, but apparently you can’t make a habit of denying the facts without needing to believe in a fantasy world yourself:

There are really only three ways to deal with all the evidence that Obama is ahead with time beginning to run out: (1) blame it on a bad Romney campaign; (2) argue some 1980-style “big shift” to Romney is inevitable and perhaps already baked into the cake; or (3) just deny it all on grounds most of the pollsters are wrong, biased or both.

Unsurprisingly, this last approach is wildly popular at the moment (Kirsanow mentions it as a possibility). It even has its own Prophet, a man named Dean Chambers who spends his time recalculating everybody’s horse-race polls and approval/disapproval numbers based on what they’d look like if they used Rasmussen’s Party ID weighting.

In other words: if you don’t like what the current electorate seems poised to do, create yourselves another one more to your suiting that’s older, whiter and more conservative just by putting your thumb on the scale (which is exactly what “Party ID weighting” amounts to, with varying degrees of semi-justification).

I for one, encourage the Republicans to continue to deny this little bit of reality. The more they believe the pollsters are lying, the less chance they’ll do anything to turn those polls around. But I do think they’re making a bit of an error here. There will come a discernible point at which the chickens will have come home to roost on this one. Global warming happens slowly, but elections happen all on one day. Will they be able to convince themselves that Romney actually won after Election Day? Stay tuned. If anyone can do it, the Republicans can. Having done all they could to steal this election by disenfranchising Democrats, they will have no trouble claiming that Obama and his Kenyan (or is it communist) co-conspirators somehow stole the election.

Is that all she’s got?

Linda McMahon says that she is talking about the issues. Make that issue. No need for that troublesome “s”. And what is the issue? The fact that Chris Murphy got a mortgage with which only Linda McMahon has been able to perceive a problem.

This is emblematic of the ideological bankruptcy of the modern Republican Party. If they tell people what they really want to do, nobody will vote for them. So they talk about irrelevancies, and when necessary, they just lie.

Here’s a sign that I saw yesterday on the front of the headquarters of the Democratic Party of Kennebunkport, Maine. We in Groton have a similar sign. Ours is not quite as big, though I think it’s more complete.

Now, ask yourself, if you were a Republican, what would you put on that sign? I mean would “Freed the slaves, but we’re the party of the ’angry white man now’” really be a big vote-getter?

Apple loses its way

Apparently Apple is having some problems with its new mapping software:

…Maps is so bad as to have created an entire tumblr dedicated to its awfulness, and the London Underground is offering assistance to the suddenly lost.

My wife and I had a first hand experience of the awfulness today. We were driving up to Maine and asked for directions to a restaurant in Kittery. We had the exact street address. My wife finally convinced the phone that Kittery, Maine and Belfast, Maine were not the same place, as the phone kept insisting, but the directions we eventually got were still wrong. We ended up at a location about a mile from our destination, on an entirely different street. But hey, at least it was in Kittery.

Friday Night Music-Common People

I'm wandering a bit here from my recent theme, which has been music Republicans have been forbidden to use. I'm stealing his from my son, who posted it on Facebook. It's not completely off theme, as I'm fairly sure The Pulp would not take kindly to Romney using their music, though I'm also pretty sure even Romney would never be stupid enough to do so, at least not this song.

 

Does he, or doesn’t he?

A friend sent me this link. I had actually seen a reference to this story in my meanderings on the web, but had gotten distracted and it went right down the old memory hole.

Anyway, it seems there is probable cause to believe that Willard had his skin (temporarily) darkened for his appearance on Univision, a television network with a largely Hispanic audience.

53% of my brain can’t believe he would have done it, but 47% of my brain is not at all sure. It is completely consistent with the contempt in which he holds ordinary people, a contempt which is no doubt more pronounced if they have skin colors close to that he was perhaps trying to duplicate.

Magnamimous Linda

After having lambasted Murphy for falling behind in his bills, and catching up with them without any political pressure, Linda McMahon announces that she will repay the creditors she stiffed in her 1976 bankruptcy. And make no mistake, hers was a strategic bankruptcy. She didn’t have to do it, and she didn’t need a fresh start, as the million dollar home she purchased as she emerged from her Chapter 7 proves.

When Chris, who would, if elected, be the least affluent person in the Senate, repaid his debts, he was still under financial stress, and the money meant something to him. Linda is only under political stress; at this point the money is just crumbs off her table, a rounding error on her tax return.

It truly is amazing how hypocritical these Republicans can be. She has been literally bragging about that bankruptcy for years, claiming that it proves that she dragged herself up from the gutter and that she therefore understands the common man. Once she found out that Chris was late with his rent a couple of times she contracted amnesia about the whole thing. It would be a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black, except in this case, the kettle is shiny by comparison.

Kudos to the New London Day for committing journalism on this issue.

Romneys, father and son

Much has been written about the contrast between Willard, a man whose lack of principles is astonishing even for a Republican politician, and his father, who was a man of high principles. The latest I’ve seen is this article quoting at length from a letter from George Romney to Barry Goldwater, warning of the dangers of appeals to racism and denial of civil rights. Bear in mind that today those civil rights are being denied in a more sophisticated fashion; not, for example, by denying the vote directly, but by putting roadblocks in the way of minorities and the poor. Here’s part of what George had to say to Barry:

[Y]our campaign never effectively deviated from the Southern-rural-white orientation…. Now, Barry, I do not assert you were aware of tho strategy or the author of it. I frankly can’t believe you shaped it. You didn’t read the platform… you didn’t know what amendments were being offered… you were obviously leaving many vital things almost entirely up to others…. [F]or these philosophical, moral, and strategic reasons, I was never able to endorse you…. [O]ur objectives cannot be realized if foundation principles of American freedom are compromised. The chief cornerstone of our freedom is divinely endowed citizenship for all equally regardless of pigmentation, creed, or race….

As to government centralization, we do share a common apprehension and concern. But then you ask me, “Where were you, George, when the chips were down and the going was hard?” Well, Barry, for a long time I’ve been right on the firing line…. In Michigan, I entered public life to help modernize Michigan state and local government as an essential step in slowing and reversing the constant flow of responsibility to Washington…. [T]alk about states’ rights will not be an adequate substitute for state responsibility….

I am much more concerned with the party’s future than its past…. The real challenge for us lies in the expansion of vote support for the Republican party in all parts of the country, urban or rural, North or South, colored or white. Without common dedication to this fundamental, our rehash of 1964 positions may become of interest only to historians of defunct political institutions…

The Republican Party appears to have an affinity for candidates with Daddy problems. In George W’s case the apple did not fall as far from the tree as did Mitt, but it’s still the case that we may very well owe the war in Iraq to Spurious George’s need to show that he could accomplish something his father had wisely failed to try to do. In Mitt’s case, I think the rejection is even clearer. His father may have been an honorable man, but what shall it profit a man, if he shall preserve his soul, and lose an election? No, Mitt is very much a man of his time and occupation. The lesson he learned from his father was this: honor and honesty are for suckers. Too bad for him (though we come out winners) that he bids fair to lose his soul (yes, I know-already done) and lose an election.

Mitt is fond of bringing up the once hapless Jimmy Carter, but if he loses this election, which by rights the Republicans should win, and brings the House down with him (and it’s beginning to look like that could happen) he will live out his days as the world’s richest laughingstock. That doesn’t sound all that bad to us peasants, but he’s so used to being rich he takes that part for granted. Unlike Jimmy, he won’t be able to salvage his reputation by building houses. He’ll probably be too busy foreclosing on them to make that a viable option.

Schadenfreude

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.

A palpably gloomy and openly frustrated mood has begun to creep into Mr. Romney’s campaign for president. Well practiced in the art of lurching from public relations crisis to public relations crisis, his team seemed to reach its limit as it digested a ubiquitous set of video clips that showed their boss candidly describing nearly half of the country’s population as government-dependent “victims,” and saying that he would “kick the ball down the road” on the biggest foreign policy challenge of the past few decades, the Palestinian-Israeli peace process.

Grim-faced aides acknowledged that it was an unusually dark moment, made worse by the self-inflicted, seemingly avoidable nature of the wound. In low-volume, out-of-the-way conversations, a few of them are now wondering whether victory is still possible and whether they are entering McCain-Palin ticket territory.

(via NYTimes.com)

Webster Bank Pushes Back

A bit of pushback from the Webster Bank, whose reputation has been sullied by McMahon’s fictitious claims about Chris Murphy:

Fed up over being dragged into the U.S. Senate race by Republican Linda McMahon, Webster Bank officials are publicly demanding her campaign retract allegations the institution is involved in a sweetheart deal with her opponent, Democratic U.S. Rep. Chris Murphy.

“We’re concerned about our reputation and will take whatever steps we need to protect our reputation,” Robert Guenther, Webster’s vice president of public affairs, said in an interview Tuesday.

Guenther said the McMahon campaign should admit it was wrong and retract the accusations leveled in the media for the past two weeks.

(via Greenwich Times)

Will get the same press play the baseless charges have received?

It’s a funny world, or at least a funny country. The rules really are different for Republicans.

Who owns the 47%?

Okay, this is why, as I keep telling my wife, who totally lacks sympathy with my plight, why I should retire from my day job, let her support me, and be a full time blogger. But I must not bemoan the unfairness of the world, in which I, like my Obama supporting brethren, firmly believe I am entitled to free stuff.

Back to my main point: This is what I drafted today, in stolen moments, while I slaved away in the office:

Romney’s 47% remarks have been analyzed almost to death. Perhaps I’ve missed it, but one thing I haven’t seen is any analysis as to how many, really, of that 47% are actually in the Obama camp. It includes lots of military families, and lots of seniors. In fact, seniors are the largest group within the group of folks who don’t pay federal income taxes, and those old geezer moochers also contribute a large percentage of their numbers to the tea party battalions. Add in poor Southern racists, and a fair number of that ilk  here in the North, and a fair number who have let their minds be numbed by Fox and/or Limbaugh, and don’t even know they’re among the moochers, (or believe they are special cases, and should not be included among the riff-raff) and I’d be willing to bet that at least 47% of those 47% are Romney voters. Probably more.

After all, we here in the Northeast are Obama voters. We also export our tax money to those fine upstanding self-reliant Southerners who will troop to the polls in November and vote against their interest by voting for the one thing they think the really want, as is so well articulated here by the inestimable Randy Newman:

And here is what I found later on. Someone had indeed run the numbers and even has a cool graphic (look where Connecticut stands), another one of those pictures of the nation proving the superiority of the blue part therof. Beaten again, just because the Romneys of the world force me to earn my own bread. Being right is cold comfort. I wanted to be first.

Hat tip to Ed Kilgore, for the video.