Skip to content

Yet some more modest proposals

Some Democrats are making pretty good noises about opposing the right wing horror show that is Gorsuch. I think it is Jeff Merkley who is pointing out that it is a stolen seat, and that’s a good line, but I’d suggest something along these lines. With one voice (ha ha, Democrats never speak with one voice) the Dems should repeat this mantra: As the Republicans said, the American people should have the right to choose who picks the next Supreme Court Justice. The American people chose Clinton, only the archaic and unrepresentative Electoral College chose Trump, and it wasn’t even close. They should be making this point on all issues, as often as the can. Not only is it true, but it is absolutely clear that it gets to Trump. If we have any hope, it’s that he will go so far off his rocker that even the Republicans will feel like they have to do something.

In that vein, it would also be a good idea for the Democrats to refer to “President Bannon” over and over again. I’ve seen reports that Trump already thinks that some of his underlings are subverting him. It can’t hurt to drive a wedge between him and the guy who is currently running the executive branch. In my humble opinion, the only way we have a chance to save the Republic is if we keep Trump off balance and paranoid. That’s a dangerous game, as he could do a lot of damage in response, but the alternative is quiet surrender to a totalitarian future.

More hopeful signs 

We are just more than a week into the administration of President Bannon, and there are lots of reasons to feel pessimistic, but I have to, once again, write about some signs of optimism. All around, people are gathering together to do their bit to oppose. Last night we went to a meeting of a new group called Rise Up Mystic Now, in truth, we don’t technically live in Mystic, but close enough. Anyway, the meeting was held in a room at the Mystic Noank Library that is possibly big enough for a gathering of 50 people. It was swamped. People were standing in the halls. For once, my better half’s penchant for always arriving early served us in good stead, for we had seats.

Follow through is critical, I know, and we’ll see how it goes from here, but it’s still heartening. This is happening all over the country, I’m sure. There are several groups forming just in the Southeast corner of our great state. In fact, one of the challenges will be to find a way for those disparate groups to coordinate.

What I think is particularly encouraging is the fact that so many people have come together over a cause that directly affects so few of them. People feel strongly about the Muslim ban. That speaks highly for the better angels of our nature.

Once again, it must be emphasized that we can’t beat back President Bannon without some help from our elected “leaders”. But even here, these grassroots groups may help. It’s always possible that they can bring some of our Democratic politicians to understand what we commoners understand: that this is not normal, and that comity, civility and compromise are simply paving stones on the road to ruin. We need massive resistance, and if it comes from the bottom up, so much the better.

By the way, if you live in the Groton/Stonington/Ledyard area, sign up.

Always look on the bright side of life

We may be going down for the count, but at least a lot of us are fighting back. The demonstrations protesting Trump’s recent act of cruelty are one small sign of hope. I don’t think there was anything like this when Hitler took over, so we are at least one up on the Germans. Someone, we’re still not sure, got the ball rolling to hold a demonstration in New London this afternoon, and given the short notice, we got pretty good turnout. Some pics below. The passersby were generally sympathetic. I only saw one negative reaction, a taxi driver who gave us the finger.

Irony abounds these days. Bill Kristol is tweeting his displeasure at an administration for which he and his ilk prepared the way. But I guess you take your allies where you find them. If these “principled” right wingers, who after all, are disproportionally represented in the media, stick to those principles and speak out against Trump, it can only help. I guess.

Again, one major question is whether the Democrats in Congress will step up, recognize the urgency of the situation, and obstruct, obstruct, obstruct, rather than acting as if this is just business as usual. Some of them seem to get it, though clearly not enough. Oddly enough, Kristen Gillibrand, hardly a fire-eater, is the only Senator to vote against all of Trump’s nominees. Chris Murphy seems to have seen the light, and even Tim Kaine is calling a spade a spade. (Or, more accurately, calling a Nazi a Nazi) Still, overall, the Democrats are being way too timid.

So, anyway, by way of justifying the title to this post, the spontaneously organized demonstrations seems to me to prove beyond doubt that a huge proportion of the citizens of this country appreciate the danger and want to do something about it. Query whether any of the institution designed to protect us from tyranny appreciate the danger. The major media, in the end, will surely fail us. We have only the courts at this point. Maybe someone like Roberts will follow Kristol and come to our aid. You can always hope.

Dubious Distinction for Obama

Today, Obama is virtually tied for first place in a new poll of the greatest modern president.

The Quinnipiac University poll indicates 29 percent say Obama is the greatest president since World War II — just shy of the 30 percent who cite Ronald Reagan, the long-standing titleholder.

via The Washington Post

No knock on Obama, but it is certainly a knock on the American people that they don’t realize that Ronald Reagan is the Fountainhead, so to speak, of all of their woes. He ushered in the age of inequality. He was a terrible president, and one of Obama’s mistakes was speaking respectfully about him. The Republicans have browbeaten many Democrats into acknowledging Reagan’s “greatness”. If you call delivering for the .01% great, then he was great. By any other measure, he was a disaster.

Obama is also improving in the “worst president” category, where he barely leads Nixon and G.W. Bush. We have a lot of stupid people in this country.

“Modern” presidents are defined as post World War II presidents. Of course, as the population ages, and the definition remains static, presidents drop out of contention as fewer people remember them. I have to say I’d have a hard time making the case that there were any great presidents after World War II. The Republicans were all horrible, some worse than others, of course. Measured by accomplishments, I’d have to give the palm to Johnson. Without him, we might not have gotten the civil rights acts, Medicare or Medicaid. Those were great accomplishments. No one else comes close.

So far as worst presidents are concerned, it’s far easier. The four worst, in order of worseness: Trump (already), Bush the Younger, Nixon, Reagan. It’s a sad thing that in that time period Reagan only comes in number four. We have the electoral college to blame for that.

Truthiness rampant

More than a hundred years ago, an Indiana legislator introduced a bill, the purpose of which was to establish a formula for squaring the circle by legislative fiat. The bill came close to passing, but ultimately failed. But the idea that you can establish a fact by a consensus of the ignorant apparently lives on.

Trump was on television and was asked about his baseless claim that 3 million votes (each of which were cast for Clinton) were illegally cast in the election. It’s obviously true because:

The ABC host later asked, “Do you think that talking about millions of illegal votes is dangerous to this country without presenting the evidence?”

“Not at all because many people feel the same way that I do,” Trump replied.

via Talking Points Memo

This is hardly the first time Trump has used this sort of reasoning. In his case, it has a remarkable circularity. He tells a lie. His followers of little brain believe him. It is therefore a fact, which he can repeat based on the authority of the people he duped in the first place.

The press, at least some of it, is pushing back against the lies. It is to be hoped they will continue to do so, but my money is on the bulk of them acceding to the new normal in relatively short order. I truly recommend that everyone re-read 1984. It took a little longer maybe, but Orwell’s world is here.

Wusses

One of the very first blog posts that I ever put up on the internet complained about the fact that Democrats were wusses. I don’t think that post is findable, as it was put up on an short lived blog that resided on my Apple IDisk, a service long since shuttered. The problem lives on, and it’s good to see that Markos, of the Daily Kos, is hammering away at the hapless Democrats. This time Elizabeth Warren, of all people, reveals her inner wuss by saying she will vote for the stunningly unqualified Ben Carson for Secretary of HUD

Sen. Elizabeth Warren explains why she will be voting to confirm Ben Carson as head of HUD:

Yes, I have serious, deep, profound concerns about Dr. Carson’s inexperience to lead the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Yes, I adamantly disagree with many of the outrageous things that Dr. Carson said during his presidential campaign. Yes, he is not the nominee I wanted.

But “the nominee I wanted” is not the test.

You have a vote. You can either cast a vote saying “I want this guy heading the department,“ or you cast one that says “Oh hell no, I don’t want this person heading the department.” So yeah, that is exactly the test. 

via Daily Kos

Exactly right. On Saturday three million people demonstrated that they understand what has happened to this nation, and millions more who could not be with them in body were with them in spirit. Yet few if any of the Democrats in Washington really get it. It seems like a no-brainer to me. We’re I a Senator, I’d vote against every single one of his nominees. They are all unqualified, or if qualified at all, they are qualified to destroy what they will be sworn to protect. If the Democrats want to channel the energy of those three millions they have to prove they get it too. It’s time to fight. No compromises.

I’ve mentioned before that I was impressed with an article in Scientific American in which the author or authors demonstrated that the best way to get someone to change his or her behavior was to engage in tit for tat. We’ve been tatted for eight years, and even if a newly elected Republican were sane, at least four years of titting would be in order. So far as the appointees are concerned, as Markos points out, they are going to get in anyway. They don’t need Democratic votes, and Democrats will get nothing in exchange for those votes. The Democrats need to demonstrate that they will resist as much as they can. It’s truly remarkable that after the last eight years any Democrat in the Senate, much less almost all of them, would think there is any advantage to trying to work with the Republicans.

A con man should really know his audience

I’m beginning to be a little more sanguine about the survival of the Republic, partly because of the level of resistance shown by today’s demonstrations, and partly because of the level of cluelessness displayed by the person who lost the popular vote.

In case you missed it, Trump blatantly lied to a group of CIA personnel. He told two whoppers; the first being that it was the media, not he, that had said derogatory things about the CIA. The second: that the media had lied about the size of the crowds at his pathetic inauguration.

Our Hitler wannabe is simply not as capable as the original. Trump actually believes that he can treat an audience of CIA people, who are paid to analyze facts, the same as an audience of rubes who have had their brains rotted out by a steady diet of Fox News. Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think there’s much percentage in insulting the intelligence of an audience like that, particularly when its members are probably wary already of a guy who is playing footsie with a country they are practically genetically engineered to distrust. These are people who can cause him real harm, should they have a mind to do so, and I suspect that they do.

I once was involved in litigation with a guy who was an inveterate con-man. He didn’t see himself that way, but everyone else who got to know him over a reasonable period of time saw him for what he was. One judge pretty much called him that from the bench. He’s still at it, but I doubt that he’s any more self aware than he was. One side effect of that lack of self awareness is that he, like Trump, didn’t know when to stop. Trump may be able to fool some of the people all of the time, but it’s unlikely many of them work for the CIA.

UPDATE: No surprise here, but I can’t resist pointing out that I called this one:

Donald Trump’s impromptu visit and speech to the CIA Saturday had the adverse effect on the intelligence community as US sources tell CBS his sppearance, “made relations with the intelligence community worse” and described the visit as “uncomfortable.”

CBS News is reporting that these sources also said the CIA workforce did not cheer the president while he was speaking, but that the first three rows in attendance were filled with loyal Trump supports.
Are you surprised by this?

And another Kellyanne Conway lie was knocked down too.

On ABC’s THIS WEEK, Conway said, “The president went to the intelligence community yesterday to establish good relationships with them, and we had over 1,000 requests to attend? We could — we can only accommodate a few hundred.”

The CBS report refutes her version of events and says, “There were about 400 members of the workforce who RSVP’d for the event out of thousands who received an invitation in their email late last week. Officials dismiss White House claims that there were people waiting to get into the event.

via Crooks and Liars

Women’s March, Local Edition

Second attempt at this, as the first time all the pictures I put up were wildly distorted. I scrapped the post, and forgot to save the text. So, here goes again.

As I said yesterday, we here in Mystic had our own little demonstration by the statue of Johnny Kelley, one of three Boston Marathon winners (the others being Tarzan Brown and Amby Burfoot), to win the Boston Marathon. Johnny was an institution around here, and I’m sure he would have approved of our choice of locale. Here he is, all dressed up for the demonstration.


So,as I understand it, the demonstration were “yuge” all over the world. Our son is in Chicago, and he told us that the demonstration there so far exceeded expectation that it had to be cancelled. We’ll know how much this got under the Donald’s skin by seeing how early he gets up to tweet about what he will say, despite all the evidence, was a low turnout. I truly believe that we need to keep the pressure on him, both this sort of thing, and a constant stream of belittling jokes and memes. 

During the time I was there (we were among the last to leave) I only witnessed two examples of negative feedback from the passing cars. For the most part, there was a constant stream of supportive honking. It seems the, at least in the Land of Steady Habits, the Orange One is not popular, and his numbers will likely never go up.

A few more pictures, which, hopefully will be undistorted.



I don’t know why, but these pictures were a bit of a struggle. You can see them full size by clicking on them. Anyway, we did our bit, and the tourists seemed to respond well.

Impeachable Offense #5

Okay, I realize that I’ve been scratching the surface here, but in my defense, I have a day job and it would surely be a full time endeavor to catalog all of Trump’s impeachable offenses. Here’s the latest:

Visitors to the newly revamped White House website get more than a simple rundown of first lady Melania Trump’s charitable works and interests — they also get a list of her magazine cover appearances and details on her jewelry line at QVC.

via The Washington Post

Is this grounds for impeachment? I think so. Using a public office, and a government website, paid for by taxpayers, for private gain would appear to be a misuse of one’s office. This is yet another example of a situation where one is sorely tempted to engage in the “what if” game, so I’ll do it. What if Obama had done something similar. It wouldn’t have been only Fox that would have savaged him. But this story will be a blip on the radar screen. By tomorrow it will be far in the rear view mirror. This is the new normal, and they want us to get used to it.

I’m happy to say that we’ll be having a little demonstration here in our neck of the woods tomorrow at 1:00 PM. There will be a little gathering by the statue of Johnny Kelley in Mystic. I didn’t know Kelley personally, though I often saw him running through the streets of Mystic, but from what I’ve heard about him, I think he’d be happy to know he’s hosting us.

Random thoughts before the bad moon rises

We are heading into some difficult times. It may very well be that we are at a critical juncture, and that we will never recapture any semblance of representative democratic governance. But while it’s important to resist, it’s also important to remember how we got here. For us Democrats, it’s important that we acknowledge that our party helped get us here by abandoning the working people of this country in exchange for Wall Street dollars, and that formula has helped bring us to where we are today. We might have been able to overcome the racist dog whistles employed by the Republicans to lure the white working class to vote against its interests if we had provided a meaningful alternative, but we didn’t.

I don’t necessarily agree with everything in this post at Naked Capitalism, but I think it sums up a lot of our most recent mistakes. We have bought into the deficit hawks view of the universe. Unlike Republicans, who forget about deficits as soon as they are in power, we buy into austerity policies, even when any competent economist could tell you it’s the wrong thing to do. I still believe that Obama gave away his majorities in both houses in 2009 when he settled for a tiny stimulus program, and then, while he still had that majority (as the linked post points out) making deficit reduction a high priority. If the Democrats had passed a good stimulus package in 2009, one that didn’t just stop the bleeding but brought us quickly back, we might have a far different country right now. Sure, the Republicans would have screamed, but they screamed anyway. If it had worked, and it would have worked if done right, none of that would have mattered. Instead of getting swept in 2010 we would have kept control. 2010 might have been the last chance the country had to rein in the plutocrats. It’s unlikely that people will be allowed to vote to turn out the Republicans in 2020. Trump is irrelevant in this equation. The Republicans may find it convenient to shunt him aside, but soon we will all be North Carolina. Votes will be suppressed nationwide, and our choices will more and more be between Tweedledum and Tweedledee. Elections in many parts of this country are already a sham, but you ain’t seen nothing yet.

Sort of riffing off of the above, I direct your attention to this post at Down with Tyranny! which asks a question: how much slack should progressives give to corporate shills like Chuck Schumer, who helped get us here in the first place. On the one hand, it hardly seems like the time to get into an internecine battle, on the other, we’ve been had before. We step up to deliver the goods, and folks like Schumer use our work to transfer those goods to their corporate backers. Think about 2006, when we took over the Congress. You can’t give the corporate Democrats credit for that. We took over in spite of them, not because of them. They then proceeded to do practically nothing, for normal people, with their majority, which was acceptable while Bush was president, but not when the Democrats controlled both the executive and the presidency. The Democrats have specialized, over the last 30 years or so, in squandering their majority’s by concentrating either on screwing workers (e.g., NAFTA), giving presents to Wall Street (e.g., repeal of Glass Steagall), or passing halfway measures that get no political payback (e.g., the inadequate stimulus). Do we ignore that reality, or make it clear while trying to make common cause that we won’t tolerate it happening again. It really is a tough question, for which I’ve no answer.

So, for sure, no blogging tomorrow. It’s impossible to type when you’re wrapped in a fetal position.