Skip to content

Some promises shouldn’t be kept

There’s been a lot of speculation about whether Obama will keep all his promises, usually from the perspective of those who are afraid that Obama won’t do what he has promised to do, e.g, end torture or exit from Iraq. After all, Obama is a politician, and although he appears to be an extraordinarily honorable politician, the fact is that all politicians fudge at least a little to get themselves elected.

But, let’s face it, for every thinking Obama supporter, there were at least a few of his promises that one hoped he wouldn’t keep, or some part of his campaign image that one hoped he would jettison.

There’s at least a glimmer of hope on one front. Obama is an apostate from the cause of secular humanism. He was raised by a good honest atheist, but somewhere along the line he lost his way. He repeatedly professed his faith in Jesus Christ, etc. For those of us who can’t quite understand belief in fairy tales, this was disappointing, but where else could we go? At least it seemed clear that he didn’t believe in burning the non-faith based among us. And, as Bill Maher said, we could always hope he was lying about his religious convictions. So it was with some pleasure that I learned today that Obama has not gone to church a single time since election day. Now, that’s change we can believe in.

More seriously, at least in the short term, we can only hope that Obama’s campaign season sabre rattling about Afghanistan will be tempered now that he has the election safely won. Juan Cole, who knows of what he speaks (and is therefore universally ignored) cautions against ratcheting up our military presence in Afghanistan. Obama’s macho posturing on Afghanistan always made me cringe during election season. I hoped, but dared not believe, that he was just saying that stuff in order to establish his credentials as an American politician who, like all other red blooded American politicians, was willing to go to war somewhere to prove his, and by extension, our manhood. The truth is that the war on terror (a stupid phrase, by the way; one does not declare war on a strategy) cannot be won with military force. In fact, it’s far easier to lose such a war with force than to win it that way. If Obama doubles down in Afghanistan it will become his Iraq. Better to find a way to gracefully withdraw. Again, we can only hope he was lying.


Thanksgiving Warmup

My brother in law is staying with us for an extended visit, and today we went to have lunch with one of his sons, who lives in upstate New York. It seemed more convenient to meet halfway, and what better place, in this season, than the site of the second most famous Thanksgiving Dinner in the history of the US. I refer, of course, to that dinner which led more or less directly to the Alice’s Restaurant Massacre, five part harmony and all.

For the untutored among you, and they do exist, I refer to Stockbridge, Massachusetts. Sad to say my nephew and his wife had no idea what we were talking about when we said that this time (we have met them there before) we were going to positively locate the fabled restaurant, and make a pilgrimage to the church. Born in the 70s, they had no idea what we were talking about.

The folks in Stockbridge, even in this Thanksgiving season, pay little heed to this piece of their history. The fellow running the bookshop allowed as how he had eaten at Alice’s (the restaurant) but it wasn’t very good. There are Norman Rockwell memorabilia everywhere (Stockbridge was one of the many New England towns where the peripatetic Rockwell resided), but nothing to memorialize, Alice, her restaurant, Arlo, or even Office Obie.

We were not deterred. Well, my wife was deterred, she thought the whole thing was silly, but my brother-in-law and I soldiered on. He had done research in advance, so we knew where to look, more or less.

First order of business: find the restaurant. As you may recall it was around the back about a half mile from the railroad track, which, truth be told, doesn’t really narrow the location down that much. You would think this sign might help:


Not only does it seem fairly clear, but it definitely points around the back of a building our research stated was the very building. Unfortunately, it appears that Theresa’s too is long gone. We went around the back, but no plaque adorned the wall to confirm that we were indeed on hallowed ground. The railroad tracks, being, as you might recall, a good half mile away, were not to be seen, and therefore of no help. There was a posted bill, however, marking the beginning of the garbage walk, which contained some information about Huntington’s Chorea, so we knew we had found it. We concluded that this is the very door, or the successor to the very door, that Arlo would have entered to visit Alice at work:


Having ascertained with some certainty that we had located the restaurant we proceeded to the Red Lion Inn, where we had a pre-Thanksgiving Dinner that couldn’t be beat (well, I may be exaggerating there), and proceeded to locate the church in which Alice, Arlo and the rest of the gang resided on that fateful day.

Arlo is now the proud owner of the church. He founded the Guthrie Center, an interfaith spiritual center, which operates from this very quiet corner of Stockbridge (actually Great Barrington). It’s a beautiful New England style church, as shown below.


A closer view of the steeple. Yes that’s a peace sign up there.


And while Stockbridge may ignore Arlo at Thanksgiving, the Guthrie Center does not ignore Thanksgiving.


So, our mission was complete. We never made any serious attempt to find the fifteen foot cliff off the side of the side road from which Arlo dumped one of the most famous piles of garbage in history. No doubt no memorial marks the spot.

Stockbridge is not without its other historical locations, and there’s one that stands in stark but silent contrast to the message of peace, and now tolerance, associated with the Massacre. On Main Street, just a half mile from the site of the old restaurant, stands this beautiful old structure.


This is the Mission House. It was originally built by a fellow named Sedgwick, who inflicted Christianity on the Indians from this location. He was followed by the famed Jonathan Edwards (like George Bush, a product of Yale), who unsuccessfully attempted to infect the Indians with his rancid brand of Christianity after he had been run out of Northampton by the locals, who couldn’t stomach his insistence that only the saved could take communion. His religious philosophy is perhaps best summed up in the title of his most famous sermon, Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God.

Who are the sinners? Pretty much everyone. Where are they all going? Hell. (Where else?) Why is God angry? Why not?

Edwards was the very intellectual forebear of the decidedly non-intellectual fundamentalists who afflict us today.

Yet, in one of the little ironies that make history so interesting, he was the actual forbear of a very different type of man: Aaron Burr. The purported traitor was Edwards’ grandson. Burr was, in fact, an adventurer, but no traitor. As he pointed out, he was put on trial for the same sort of stuff for which Sam Houston was revered and Crockett and Bowie canonized. More to the point, unlike his narrow minded grandfather, Burr was a true progressive, a true abolitionist, a believer in equality of the races and the sexes, and a friend of the working man. As to religion, he wasn’t much interested.

The arc from grandfather to grandson, in some way, replicates the longer historical arc extending from Puritan to modern New England. Who could have guessed that the New England of Jonathan Edwards would evolve into the New England of today, which boasts the only two states (including our own) that greeted the institution of gay marriage mostly with yawns (take that, California), and can now proudly boast of being the least dogmatically religious (and, I would argue, the most intellectual) section of the country.


Friday Night Music-Pat Benatar

A search of my past blog posts indicates I haven’t put up a Pat Benatar video, unless I did so on my old blog. One of the mysteries of youtube is the fact that some artists are well represented, while with others there’s slim pickings. There’s only one decent video of Hit Me With Your Best Shot, so here it is:


Crazy

What were these judges thinking?

A state appeals court has ruled that a newspaper can be sued for libel for reporting allegations from a lawsuit before any court proceedings have taken place.

The ruling reversed a lower court ruling that dismissed a libel claim against The Record of Bergen County brought by Thomas John Salzano, who alleged the newspaper defamed him in 2006 by reporting a federal bankruptcy court complaint that he misappropriated money from a Newark telecommunications company.

The court said The Record was not privileged to “republish alleged defamatory statements within a bankruptcy court complaint” and that the newspaper did not demonstrate the allegations were true or non-defamatory.

If Ted Stevens gets off on appeal can he sue every paper in the land for reporting on the allegations against him? Hopefully the NJ Supreme Court will reverse this case.


Second most important election of the year

Henry Waxman beat John Dingell in a secret ballot among House Democrats. Waxman will now chair the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Dingell has been a pawn of the auto industry for years, and is as much responsible for Detroit’s shortsighted approach to its business as were the managers that flew their private jets to Washington to be for taxpayer cash.

It is now not only possible, but likely, that the House will take some meaningful steps to combat global warming.


Gil Shasha prevails

This is a little different, and is of no particular political interest, but I must register my delight upon reading this story (Shasha prevails at ‘last trial’) in the New London Day.

Gil is no longer practicing, for reasons that are fairly murky, as the article states, but whatever the reason, he’s gone out in style:

Veteran attorney Gilbert Shasha, who retired from practicing law eight months ago and surrendered his license after more than 40 years, was back in court this week, representing himself against a fraud claim brought by another local lawyer.

Shasha’s voice broke as he told the jury it would be his last trial, and after about two hours of deliberating Wednesday, the six-member panel found in his favor, delivering him a victory with which to cap his courtroom career.

Gil was being sued by a lawyer who claimed that Gil and a client had reneged on an agreement not to lien or convey the client’s home. The lawyer, John Asselin-Connolly, was suing a former client for a fee.

Now, I could have saved that lawyer a lot of money. It was not a good idea to sue Gil. Gil never heard of a case that didn’t belong in front of a jury, and there wasn’t much he couldn’t talk a jury into doing. We can only be thankful he never used his powers to do evil.

And in his final case, he ran true to form. He did no evil. I won’t express my opinion of his opponent, but I’ll simply reproduce the following from the Day:

Shasha said he was relieved and grateful to the jury and that he hopes other divorce clients Asselin-Connolly has sued would get courage from this case.

”A person comes to him in a turmoil in a divorce case and he considers that a commercial opportunity,” he said of Asselin-Connolly during closing arguments. “It’s like selling socks to him.”


Compassion for the downtrodden

My wife told me about this. She is an honest person, as everyone knows, but I couldn’t help think that she was delusional:

The governors of Connecticut, New York and New Jersey are asking the federal government for a $48 million emergency grant to help thousands of financial industry workers who are losing their jobs.

The governors say the emergency grant would allow the states to give each laid-off worker $12,500 to help them find jobs and relocate, and provide them with other services.

Now, I’m a compassionate guy. I might even support this sort of assistance for laid off workers, but is there precedent for simply giving cash to laid off workers? I assume these folks are eligible for unemployment compensation, so this has to be in addition to that. Why the special treatment? Is there something about the plight of laid off financial sector people that these folks find especially easy to relate to?

These are folks who toiled in the vineyards of an industry in which they were most likely to, or at least had resources to, salt some money aside against the lean years. That’s something precious few of the rest of us can do.

Maybe the details of the proposal are not as bad as the AP summary, but judging by this article it looks like our government leaders just can’t get enough of bailing out anyone who works in that sector of the economy which has brought this country to the brink of destruction.


Fool them thrice, or more

From the New York Times:

The Treasury secretary, Henry M. Paulson Jr., on Tuesday rejected pleas to use money from the $700 billion bailout program to help homeowners avoid foreclosure or to stave off bankruptcy by Detroit’s Big Three automakers.

Facing a barrage of complaints from Democratic lawmakers that he was ignoring the will of Congress, Mr. Paulson dug in his heels and said he wanted to put money only into financial institutions.

It would be a fun parlor game for political junkies to sit around and try to remember all the occasions during the past eight years that the Bush Administration has essentially told Congress to “trust us” by granting it sweeping, ill defined and easily abused powers.

I can’t remember them all. The Iraq War comes to mind, as does the semi-authorization to torture, as does the “Patriot” Act, as does the FISA fiasco.

Each has one common feature. No matter the subject matter, each time the Bush Administration has been handed power of any sort, it has abused it. The more broad the grant of authority, or the more loosely drawn the legislation, the more the abuse.

So how can it be that our illustrious Congresspersons are shocked that Paulson too has abused the authority he was given. How can they be surprised that he has declined to use, or even abuse, authority he was given that he does not choose to use-such as the authority to help individual homeowners in lieu of the rich that are alone deserving of aid? Was there ever any reason to believe that the classic Bush pattern would not prevail. And I say this knowing full well that Bush himself is now largely irrelevant. The pattern and practice remains the same, whether Bush is involved or not. The ethos of corruption and abuse of power runs too deep in this administration. It is, as Obama would say, what they do.

There was never any reason to believe that Paulson would administer this bailout in good faith, by attempting to achieve all of the objectives Congress had in mind. He might not have done those things even if the legislation required him to do so. We will never know, because everything was optional. It was absurd to think that one of the most corrupt administrations in history would not go out in style after it was given almost total discretion to spread $700 billion in taxpayer dollars wherever it chose. Why would anyone think it would break with past practice and put the money where it might do some good.

I hope Joe Courtney read the Times article. If he did, it could only have reinforced his conviction that he did the right thing. His vote against is looking better by the day.


Update

Last night I claimed victory in the Lieberman bet I made with a friend so many months ago. (To recap: I bet that the Dems would not bounce Lieberman as committee chair even if they got 57 members in the caucus.) Last night, I invited my opposite number to concede defeat.

Well, yesterday I was in court all day. When I checked my voicemail today, there was one message. It was a gracious concession, delivered only minutes after the Democratic cave to Joe was announced, and prior to the Begich victory. The concession preceded the demand.

So, my wife and I get a free meal after the first of the year. I’ll say again, I wish that we were the ones footing the bill. It just goes to show that every cloud has a silver lining. Loathsome Joe is, at least, the occasion for us to get back together with friends from way back.


I’m declaring victory

It is with unmixed sadness that I must claim victory in my bet with a sometime liberal drinker. Almost a year ago I bet him that the Democrats would not strip Joe Lieberman of his chairmanships, even if they won 57 seats. I even unilaterally changed the rules to exclude Lieberman from the count.

It’ looks like Begich will win in Alaska. When he is offically announced, he will be the 57th caucus member, excluding the Loathsome Lieberman. My victory becomes official then, but I am claiming it now.

Proving that victory has not stiffened their spines, the Democrats voted today to let Joe keep his Homeland Security post in exchange for which he gave up a meaningless subcommittee chair and made an insincere apology.

You did not hear it here first, but let me echo what all reality based folks are saying. Lieberman will stab the Democrats in the back at his first opportunity. He will do it with relish. Whatever private assurances he gave will be forgotten once the formal vote is taken.

This vote sends a message loud and clear. There is no price to pay for political betrayal, as long as it’s Democrats that are being betrayed.

I’m looking forward to a formal concession from the person with whom I bet. If I recall the bet, he and his wife buy dinner for me and my wife. I can’t remember. Do we get to pick the restaurant?

UPDATE: I hadn’t seen this when I wrote the above. Apparently, Begich is now the acknowledged winner.