Skip to content

Ronald McDonald-hedgehog killer

01020110753600.jpg

Cute, isn’t (s)he? He (or she) is a hedgehog and scores of its furry brethren have met a fate worse than death..no, wait, a fate equal to death- mainly death, through the miracle of modern design from one of the many American incarnations of evil, the McDonald’s corporation:

Many German hedgehogs have been found dead in recent years after meeting a strange end — they got their heads stuck inside McDonald’s McFlurry containers and starved as a result. The company has gone back to the drawing board and will now introduce a new, hedgehog-friendly design for its dessert lids.

Actually, the company went back to the drawing board almost two years ago, but only recently managed to come up with a design that isn’t hazardous to the cute little creatures. The must have put it on the fast track. Now if they could only come up with a design that would prevent people from getting at their food, they’d save even more lives.

Harry Reid honors a hold

Via Kos, we learn that right wing Senator Tom Coburn has put a hold on legislation that would prevent insurance companies from denying coverage to people who have genetic predispositions to certain diseases or conditions. It’s hard to see why anyone would be against this. Even Coburn says he isn’t against it, he just has some problems with the bill that make no sense.

You remember holds, don’t you. A hold is what Chris Dodd put on the FISA bill. It announces an intent to filibuster, a threat that is utterly meaningless unless you have 39 other senators willing to back you up. Last year a similar bill passed the Senate 98-0, so it’s hard to see how Coburn could successfully stall the bill.

You’re probably saying to yourself: Well, there’s no way Harry Reid would honor Coburn’s hold, not after he disregarded Chris’s hold, and not after he disregarded Ron Wyden’s hold. But you’d be wrong, because Reid is, in fact, honoring Coburn’s hold, at least he is right now.

This is the sort of thing designed to make Democrats see red. Reid refused to honor a hold on legislation he claims to oppose; then he allows Coburn to stall a bill that even Republicans support. If the Democrats were going to use the incident to make political hay it might be somewhat justified, but that’s not the Democratic way. Coburn is a serial abuser of the hold privilege, but it doesn’t seem to bother Reid. He saves his wrath for fellow Democrats.

A conflict of interest

This is an interesting story. Mark Penn, the guy who has advised Hillary’s campaign so successfully, obviously has a financial interest in a Hillary victory. But, should Hillary lose the nomination, he also has a financial interest in Obama losing in November. No conflict with respect to Hillary maybe, but a massive conflict in relation to the Democratic party. Is this the reason why he seems to be taking the position that if Hillary can’t win, he’ll make sure she brings Obama down with her? Details here.

Not good

Joe Courtney is trying to raise money in response to the attacks that are being mounted against him on FISA. It’s a good thing to do, since this sort of stuff might stop if the Republicans see it’s a money loser for them. Here’s the link to contribute.

Unfortunately, my wife tried twice to contribute and it timed out both times. I’d like to think that contributors are clogging the server, but somehow I doubt it. If there’s anyone on the political side of Joe’s operation reading this, it would be a good idea to try to fix whatever is wrong.

The sliming begins

The attacks on Barack Obama have begun. The Republicans are questioning his patriotism, and CNN immediately runs a poll asking if he’s patriotic enough to be president (sign a protest letter here). No word so far on whether they’ll poll on whether McCain is too dishonest to be president. Then again, even McCain can’t hope to come close to the incumbent, so apparently no level of dishonesty is disqualifying.

It is depressing that Clinton seems to be blazing a trail for the Republicans to follow. Attacking your opponent on policy issues, even if you distort their positions a bit, is part of the game. Injecting racism is a bit different. Recently one of Hillary’s surrogates said she couldn’t see anything wrong with distributing pictures of Obama in native African dress because ” I have no shame or no problem with people looking at Barack Obama in his native clothing, in the clothing of his country.” Barack Obama is an American. The Republican party will do everything it can to paint him as a foreigner, and Hillary and her people are doing everything they can to legitimize that line of attack.

Now we will see if Obama can deal with this sort of thing. If he reacts passively, like Kerry did, we are likely to see a re-run of 2004. He needn’t go after Hillary, he can go after the media, like the Republicans would do. The CNN poll would be as good a place to start as any.

The forces of ignorance come calling

I just got a call from a group that I believe called itself the Protect America Foundation, trying to spread lies about the FISA vote. Unfortunately, I can’t contain my outrage at these people. In retrospect I should have feigned ignorance, and listened to her whole pitch, but I cut her off and told her I wasn’t interested in approving of phone companies spying on me, which is what she was basically trying to sell. I wonder, though, if I’d played along, whether she would ever have mentioned the immunity issue. More likely it was going to be a lot of malarkey about Democrats supporting terrorists.

If any of you out there get one of these calls, don’t be stupid like me. Instead, act stupid and find out what they have to say.

Give Senator Warner what he wants

Recently, Barack Obama made what is actually a relatively non-controversial statement about the state of our Armed Forces:

You know, I’ve heard from an Army captain who was the head of a rifle platoon — supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq.

And as a consequence, they didn’t have enough ammunition, they didn’t have enough humvees. They were actually capturing Taliban weapons, because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief. Now, that’s a consequence of bad judgment.

The right wing smear machine has gone into high gear to attack Obama, and Senator John Warner, of Virginia, ranking member on the Senate Armed Services Committee, has joined in the attack:

Warner — a World War II veteran and former Navy Secretary — has been a staunch advocate for U.S. troops. Warner’s letter to Obama asks the senator to provide “essential facts” about the Army captain’s story, including his personal information, so members of the committee can interview him and others to establish accountability, “depending of course, on the accuracy of the facts.”

If the Democrats had the killer instinct, the would take Warner up on his demands. Obama’s statement has already been independently verified twice. If Warner wants hearings on troop readiness, the Democrats should give them to him, and when the White House refuses to co-operate, they should demand co-operation in Warner’s name.

Update. A commenter asks for links demonstrating that Obama’s assertion has been verified. Here’s one, which links to primary sources.

Nader redux

Ralph Nader is going to run for president again. The man is pitiful. He will be remembered, not as the great consumer advocate, but as the man who gave this country George Bush. This time around the old man will find that no one is listening.

The Real McCain, part 1

Today begins part one of an occasional series, a retrospective if you will (probably every Sunday) about John McCain, the presumptive nominee of the Republican party. I am impelled to start this series for a number of reasons. First, it’s like shooting fish in a barrel. Second, I have come to the conclusion that many of my readers have a life, and don’t spend most of their spare time, as do I, cruising other blogs and/or other internet websites, obsessively reading up on this sort of stuff. Based on conversations I have had with a number of people, I have come to the conclusion that the media narrative about the noble John McCain has seeped deep. so that many otherwise reasonable Democrats, or Democratic leaning voters, have misperceptions about McCain that have been planted in their minds by years of fawning media coverage. Despite his hard right views, for instance, they believe in the myth of his moderation, or, as so many people did with Colin Powell, project their own beliefs on to him. I would like to do my part to disabuse my small corner of the blogosphere of such notions.

First subject: the trophy wife. I broach this subject with some hesitation, because I would be the first to acknowledge that we cannot know what goes on in anyone’s marriage and a person’s personal life is not necessarily indicative of his or her political character. But, judge not lest ye be judged. McCain was comfortable voting to impeach Bill Clinton for a blow job, so it’s only fair that we see how his own behavior measures up against the standards he imposed on Clinton.

In a nutshell, McCain fits quite comfortably within the Gingrich tradition. As you may recall, Newt visited his wife as she lay suffering from cancer in a hospital bed to discuss details of their divorce. McCain’s story is somewhat similar. Let’s set the stage:

Before John McCain’s tour of duty in Vietnam, he married  Carol Shepp, a model from Philadelphia. On his 23rd bombing mission over North Vietnam in 1967, McCain was shot down and captured.

While he was imprisoned, Carol was in an auto wreck (1969), thrown through her car’s windshield and left seriously injured. Despite her injures, she refused to allow her POW husband to be notified about her condition, fearing that such news would not be good for him while he was being held prisoner.

When McCain returned to the United States in 1973 after more than five years as a prisoner of war, he found his wife was a different person. The accident “left her 4 inches shorter and on crutches, and she had gained a good deal of weight.”

McCain spent the years between 1973 and 1980 as a serial adulterer. Let the fawning Nicholas Kristof, who finds good in all McCain does, tell the story:

It was 1979, and it was becoming clear that [McCain] would never make admiral like his father and grandfather. He had always dreamed of doing something great, of imprinting his name on the history books, but at age 42 he found himself with a stuttering military career and no base from which to go into politics.

On top of that, his personal life was a mess: Although he was still living with his wife, he was aggressively courting a 25-year-old woman who was as beautiful as she was rich.

But Cindy Hensley was a two-fer. Not only was she young and beautiful, but she was rich. Or at least her daddy was, and he was rich enough to get McCain’s career jump started for him:

In 1979 at a military reception in Honolulu, McCain met Cindy Hensley, an attractive 25-year-old woman from a very wealthy politically-connected Arizona family. Cindy’s father, Jim, founded the Hensley and Company,  the nation’s third-largest Anheuser-Busch distributor.

McCain described their first meeting, “She was lovely, intelligent and charming, 17 years my junior but poised and confident. I monopolized her attention the entire time, taking care to prevent anyone else from intruding on our conversation. When it came time to leave the party, I persuaded her to join me for drinks at the Royal Hawaiian Hotel. By the evening’s end, I was in love.”

While still married to Carol, McCain began an adulterous relationship with Cindy. He married Cindy in May 1980 — just a month after dumping Carol and securing a divorce. The newlyweds honeymooned in Hawaii.

So, like Newt, McCain left a disabled wife for a younger woman, and never looked back. His new father in law bankrolled his political career.

Now, McCain has not, until lately, been as insufferable a hypocrite as Newt, Larry Craig, Mark Foley, et. al., ad nauseam, about matters of personal morality. I bring this up only because I have observed that somehow, a very benign version of these events has seeped into a lot of people’s view of McCain’s marital past. One person I spoke to was convinced that Cindy was the same age as McCain; one that he had divorced his first wife while fresh from imprisonment in Vietnam, still reeling from the trauma of imprisonment. I think these sanitized narratives come about not because they are consciously propagated by anyone, but because they are consistent with the overall media narrative we are fed, in which McCain is a noble moderate maverick just oozing integrity, whose very faults are proof that he is superior to the common political herd. It’s important that we disabuse right thinking (meaning left thinking) people of these sentiments.

Next time: the Keating Five.

In a nutshell

FISA explained:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7X8u5IEEBc[/youtube]