Skip to content

Linda in Milford, Dick (and others) in Groton

CTBlogger caught the Danbury News Times in a bit of a (well, actually, a colossal) stretcher yesterday. According to the Times, Linda McMahon and yesterday’s news Scott Brown drew 2,500 people to a rally yesterday:

A crowd estimated at about 2,500 people stood waiting to hear from the senator and the woman who hopes to join him on Capitol Hill with a victory over Democratic candidate Richard Blumenthal on Nov. 2.

CTBlogger rather exhaustively documented that the crowd was about one tenth of that figure. He must have drawn blood, because if you go the News Times article now, here’s what you see:

A crowd in the hundreds stood waiting to hear from the senator and the woman who hopes to join him on Capitol Hill with a victory over Democratic candidate Richard Blumenthal on Nov. 2.

There’s a slide show still up at the News Times article, in which the crowd size is artfully masked. Does someone have an agenda?

Meanwhile, here in Groton, we hosted Dick Blumenthal yesterday at our headquarters. He was here to meet with the folks who were pounding the pavement going door to door in support of his candidacy. Truth to tell, he didn’t draw even 250 people, but the event had not been publicized like Linda’s, and wasn’t for the general public. So I’d say the dozens of people he did draw compared favorably to Linda’s crowd. Let’s just say that Linda has a problem getting things that money can’t buy, like loyalty and enthusiasm.

Not everyone was there to ring doorbells, since we had another event going on (manning a booth at the Groton Fall Festival, which Blumenthal visited later, where he was warmly received by the Festival visitors) and since some folks weren’t in shape for long walks, like Ted Hurlock, of Groton, a WW II vet who showed up especially to see Blumenthal and have his picture taken. I thought the picture below was better than the posed shots.


Dick wasn’t the only politician making the rounds at the Festival. In fact, Groton was swarming with federal and statewide candidates yesterday. Here’s Joe Courtney with Amy Moncy and Joe’s staffer and former Grotonite, John Hollay:


Denise Merrill dropped by. Here she’s checking out a display by the Fitch High School robotics team:


Kevin Lembo and George Jepsen were also working the crowd, but I couldn’t find them, so no pics. Denise Nappier also came by headquarters, and I presume, the festival, though I can’t swear to that. I hadn’t met Denise before, but we have something in common as we both graduated from Hartford Public High School, so we had a politics free conversation about good old HPHS. She was year behind me. I will spare her and not specify the years.

Well, that’s it from me on this Sunday morning. I defy anyone to detect any kind of structural unity in the above post.

Friday Night Music-Mea Culpa

Last week I opined that bagpipe music began and ended with Amazing Grace. Last night, to prove me wrong, one of our liberal drinkers loaned me a CD by a group called Rare Air. The CD is named Primeval. The group pretty much defies categorization, but I would say Celtic jazz is as close as you can come. I listened to the CD this morning, and I hereby eat my words. You can make good music with a bagpipe, at least you can if you surround it with other instruments. There isn’t much on youtube by these gents, but I found two. The first is a number called New Swing Reel.

The second must have a name, but they never mention it in the video, and I’m not about to try to match it up with the numbers on the CD.

So, I hereby eat my words, on the subject of bagpipes. (I’m sticking to my guns about Matt Collette though)


Mercenary madness

This article in the New York Times is mind boggling on many levels:

Afghan private security forces with ties to the Taliban, criminal networks and Iranian intelligence have been hired to guard American military bases in Afghanistan, exposing United States soldiers to surprise attack and confounding the fight against insurgents, according to a Senate investigation.

The Pentagon’s oversight of the Afghan guards is virtually nonexistent, allowing local security deals among American military commanders, Western contracting companies and Afghan warlords who are closely connected to the violent insurgency, according to the report by investigators on the staff of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

The United States military has almost no independent information on the Afghans guarding the bases, who are employees of Afghan groups hired as subcontractors by Western firms awarded security contracts by the Pentagon. At one large American airbase in western Afghanistan, military personnel did not even know the names of the leaders of the Afghan groups providing base security, the investigators found. So they used the nicknames that the contractor was using — Mr. White and Mr. Pink from “Reservoir Dogs,” the 1992 gangster movie by Quentin Tarantino. Mr. Pink was later determined to be a “known Taliban” figure, they reported.

Let’s put aside the fact that our soldiers are being guarded by their enemies, making them more like prisoners than soldiers. Why, in the first place, is anyone other than our own soldiers guarding our bases? Since when does our army require protection by an army of mercenaries? How does this make any sense? Isn’t it a little like hiring the Indians to protect the cavalry?

It’s certainly a scandal that we are paying the Taliban for protection, but it’s every bit as much of a scandal that we are paying anyone. If we don’t want to run our Empire right, maybe we should consider closing it down.


Junior (very junior) member of the vast conspiracy

The Day has long had a battered spouse syndrome type of relationship with the local right wing. They constantly try to appease them, though it never works. Apparently they’ve upped the ante, having gotten themselves a good right leaning reporter, who is always prepared to carry water for the Republicans. The fellows name is Matt Collette. I really should have collected a bunch of his trespasses before writing this, but I’ll confine myself to three.

First up, this article about the local Republican’s version of the national Pledge to Destroy America:

In a show of party unity not visible among local Democratic candidates, a group of Republicans running for seats in the Connecticut General Assembly pledged to combat the state’s looming fiscal woes with “common sense” solutions.

Whatever is the gentleman talking about? It is quite possible that Democratic unity isn’t visible to him, but that’s because he doesn’t appear to pay much attention to Democrats, other than to trash them. Now, I’ll grant you, Democrats do think for themselves, so they are far less likely than Republicans to march in lockstep (or, since Nazi comparisons are all the rage these days, should I say goose step?), but I’ve seen no evidence that Democrats are not united. So what’s he talking about? Where’s his–you know–evidence?

Next up, we have the why don’t we swallow the Republican talking point whole act. This is from a puff piece about the three Republican contenders for the Second Congressional nomination:

Along with fellow Republicans, they want to reverse Democratic policies like the health care reform bill, enacted by Obama and Democrats in Congress earlier this year, decrease federal spending and restore the Bush tax cuts to reduce the federal deficit and work to improve the economy through job creation and reduced regulations on corporations. (Emphasis added)

Now, an actual reporter might point out that no respectable economist will tell you that preserving this massive transfer of wealth will cut the deficit. It flies in the face of common sense, basic math, and past experience, since both the Reagan and Bush tax cuts produced massive deficits. Where, pray tell, does Mr. Collette think our present deficits came from? Now, Republicans are certainly within their rights to spread these fables. It’s what they do. But it’s a poor reporter that simply passes them on as fact. I’ll be keeping an eye, by the way, to see if Mr. Collette allows Democratic claims to go unquestioned. Note that I’m giving him a pass on swallowing the claim that reducing regulations will improve the economy (talk to the folks around the Gulf about that), but since it takes more than first grade math to wrap your head around that issue, I’m letting that one go, except to add if he was up to third grade history he might recall that it was reduced regulations that tanked the economy in the first place. But that would be asking him to have a functioning memory, and, to be fair, almost no one in the press has one of those.

Finally, here’s one with a local twist.

Last spring, the Groton Long Point Association requested $208,000 for its police department, a sum equivalent to what it would cost the town to police the area itself. In a tight vote, the RTM voted to eliminate that funding, a move it upheld when members tried to reverse the decision.

I’m going to take a page from Dean Baker here. Mr. Collette has no basis on which to assert that the amount in question is equivalent to what it would cost the town to police the area itself. He could report, accurately enough, that the folks from Groton Long Point make that claim, but he has no basis to assert this as a fact. But it does fit the interests of type of folks that appear to be near and dear to his heart.

My wife and I have noticed Collette’s rightward tilt, but I haven’t stooped to notice him in this august space prior to this. But the “unity” quote above tipped me over the edge. In for a dime, in for a dollar. You’ll be hearing more about him if this kind of thing keeps up.


Bad Blogger!

That’s as in, or similar to, “bad dog!”, for I have been very bad indeed.

I did not watch the Blumenthal debate. I did not watch the Malloy debate. A Bad Blogger, indeed.

I actually have an excuse for part of the Blumenthal debate. I watched the first several minutes and couldn’t take it anymore. This was a result of the combination of the stupid questions and Blumenthal’s poor start. Blumenthal is not a street fighter. He’s perfectly capable of fighting in the halls of the Senate or in a court, but he’s temperamentally unsuited to standing next to someone and engaging in the kind of brawl that has been dignified by the name of “debate” in this country. I think he’s sincere, if a bit (a bit?) stiff and I’m afraid he is still infected with that Democratic belief that a debate should be discussion of the issues. Anyway, I decided to spare myself the frustration of listening to him fail to give the answers that popped so easily into my head, and left the room. And then, a miracle occurred. We lost our power, thereby legitimizing the action I would have taken anyway.

Last night I had a meeting in Waterford, and by the time I got home, it was too late to watch. I would have been more than happy to watch Dan, because unlike Dick, he is a street fighter, and if I’d had to bet on that face-off, my money would have been on Dan. From what I hear, I would have won some money on that bet.

But, no excuses, I really should have watched them both. I’m a bad blogger.

Moving on, my wife informs me that according to the messages flying back and forth in the twittersphere, or at least the #CTSen and #CTGov portion of it, all four candidates won, with Linda’s paid minions pushing their tweeting point (apparently they only have one) at a pace both fast and furious.

I’m sure that twitter serves some purpose. I, in fact, have an account, and have actually tweeted on rare occasions. But the political side of it strikes me as a bit like the old Compuserve forums. I was in two kinds of forums. Back then, I was a computer hobbyist, in that I wrote programs in Visual Basic. The forums dedicated to that were great. If you had a problem you could post something about it, and people would reply with helpful suggestions. Everyone was nice to each other. I also joined one or two political forums. One was about the American presidency, and I actually was deluded enough to think it was for people interested in history. But, in fact, it was a forum for people dedicated to insulting one another. Since Clinton was president most of the threads involved invective against Clinton or his forum dwelling supporters, countered by more of the same from those supporters. So far as I know, Clinton himself took no part. No one actually engaged in any kind of meaningful discourse, no one changed anyone’s opinion. Indeed, no one really expected or wanted to change anyone’s opinion. Twitter, political style, is much the same. I’m not sure if the brevity requirement is a blessing or a curse. All that being said, I do get a kick out of the clever stuff emanating from the people with whom I agree. The other guys are all idiots.


Shameful behavior on the campaign trail

Joe Courtney is one of the nicest politicians I’ve ever met. Some might say that’s damning with faint praise, but Joe would be on the nice guy side of the scale in any group you’d care to name. So it is with heavy heart that I must call him out on the devious campaign tactics in which he is obviously engaged.

Last week the Peckinpaugh campaign issued a press release, calling attention to a video that made Peckinpaugh and Rob Simmons look like– well, it made them look like the assholes they are. Today, we hear of yet another press release from the Peckinpaugh campaign.

Searching for a breakthrough in its run against U.S. Rep. Joe Courtney, D-2nd District, Republican Janet Peckinpaugh’s campaign issued a press release Friday encouraging voters to make her “the first woman elected to the U.S. House from the 2nd Congressional District.”

Just one problem: She wouldn’t be the first.

The first woman elected to represent Connecticut’s 2nd District was Chase Going Woodhouse, a Democrat who served in Congress from 1945 to 1947 and again from 1949 to 1951.

There is only one logical conclusion to draw from all of this. The Courtney campaign has placed an operative deep within the Peckinpaugh operation, which operative is engaged in an orchestrated campaign to make Peckinpaugh look like the biggest horse’s ass to come along since–well, since Rob Simmons. This is the sort of thing that would make Karl Rove turn green with envy.

Don’t try to tell me this is just incompetence. No one could be so stupid as to issue such a press release without even checking to see if the central assertion made was true. I mean, how long would it take to check that fact through Google, or on wikipedia? Two minutes, three maybe if you’re using a PC? What competent campaign worker wouldn’t foresee that someone would check it once the release was issued. And, looking back, is there a person alive who could possibly believe it would be a good thing if voters watched that video, or, given the squirm factor, tried to watch it?

No, I refuse to believe anyone is that stupid, so there is only one explanation. Well, Democrat or not, nice guy or not, I’m crying foul. There’s some things that you just don’t do. After all, Peckinpaugh is way behind and this type of loathsome campaign tactic is totally unnecessary. Joe should apologize to Peckinpaugh, remove his operative from Peckinpaugh’s campaign, and insert him or her into the McMahon camp where he or she belongs.

Sure I’ve got principles, but they’re flexible.

Friday Night Music-Something Completely Different

Despite my godlessness, I do like various kinds of sacred music. A few weeks ago I thought it might be fun to get various versions of Amazing Grace, but very few really struck my fancy until I found this. One could make a compelling argument that the repertoire of the bagpipe begins and ends with this song, so how better to hear it than played by massed bagpipes in Moscow? Well, massed bagpipes in Edinburgh might be better, but then again the international character of this performance adds something that a purely Scottish performance might lack.


You can’t always have it both ways

Linda McMahon doesn’t quite understand that some questions can’t be ducked.

Ted Mann, The Day: Should it be reduced now? Since businesses are struggling, as you all described? Would you argue for reducing the minimum wage now?

McMahon: “We have got minimum wages in states, we have got minimum wages in the (federal) government, and I think we ought to look at all of those issues in terms of what mandates are being placed on businesses and can they afford them. I think we should get input from our business community. We should listen to our small business operators and we should hear what it is they have to say and how it’s impacting their businesses and make some of those decisions.”

Her strategy has been to avoid talking about issues, going so far as saying it would be inappropriate to tell people what she thinks about social security. She must have figured that using her standard response: let’s listen to the people, would serve her just fine. But the only “people” she mentioned were the folks who want to cut the minimum wage, so despite herself, she answered the question. Even some American voters can see through this one.

Location:W 42nd St,New York,United States

The way of the world, local edition

As regular readers, particularly my fellow Grotonites, know, the Groton Long Point police issue is a bit of a hobbyhorse for me. A few months back I was feeling great (and vindicated) because the Representative Town Meeting voted to end the Town’s long time subsidy of this unnecessary service to the most affluent of our local citizenry. Given the deep cuts inflicted on the really important items in the budget, getting rid of this boondoggle seemed like an obvious thing to do.

But some things are universal, apparently, and one of those things is the ability of almost any legislative body to feel the pain of the rich:

The Town Council will try to restore money cut from the Groton Long Point Association’s police budget, voting at its next meeting to spend $128,000 from its $350,000 contingency account.

The appropriation would then go to the town’s Representative Town Meeting, which last spring voted to strip the subdivision of the $208,000 it had initially requested, the equivalent of what it would cost the town to police the area with its own force.

“We do pay our fair share of taxes, and we receive very few services,” said Groton Long Point Association President Bob Congdon, speaking at the Town Council’s Committee of the Whole meeting Tuesday night. “This was one of the very few services we did receive.”

The empathy was bi-partisan. In fact, the only vote against was from a Republican, which speaks volumes about the fact that this part of Connecticut may be one of the few places in the country in which rational Republicans still reside. But, I digress.

The last time I looked, we allow the children of Groton Long Point in our schools. We plow and maintain their roads. We let them in our library. In fact, when a real crime is committed there, as opposed to the crime of entering Groton Long Point when not a resident, we provide police services. There is probably not a single service the town provides that they don’t get, except, possibly, whatever scant services are provided to the poor. Of course, we are not providing any of those services to anyone as well as we used to, because we have been cutting the budget, urged on by “taxpayers” organization consisting mainly of residents of Groton Long Point. So, as in the nation, so is it in our little town. The rich demand and get their perks, while insisting that the rest of us make sacrifices.

But, hope remains. Maybe the RTM will stick to its guns. Stay tuned.

Postscript: I should add that the contingency fund, as I always understood it, is supposed to be for unforeseen expenses, not to reinstate a line item intentionally removed from the budget. There are probably a thousand things that money would be better spent on, such as teachers, but the rich must be served.


Let’s get serious

In my last post I said I didn’t feel like ranting, and I still don’t, at least not about anything political, but I must put in my two cents about a recent development in the world of the Ipad.

The New Yorker now has an app. I just downloaded it, but unfortunately there’s no free issue, which is the norm for magazine apps. No matter, there’s a short sample, and it appears to be laid out well.

Here’s the rub. The cost per issue is $4.99. That’s a dollar off the newsstand price, which isn’t bad, if you are only going to buy an occasional issue. But there’s no subscription option. We subscribe to the print edition, and I’d gladly pay the New Yorker the same price for an Ipad edition, but there’s no way I’m paying over $250.00/year for the New Yorker. How can they expect to make money with that kind of business model?

And, while we’re talking about Ipads and magazines, here’s hoping that the New York Review of Books will release an Ipad edition. Again, I’d be willing to pay what I paid for a paper subscription.

I’ve read in various places that Apple is holding up long term subscriptions for Ipad magazines. That really makes no sense, if it’s true.

End of rant.