Skip to content

Too hot for the lizards

Tucked away on the bottom of the front page of the Day this morning was a tiny little article about the mass extinctions of lizards due to global warming. Here’s a fuller treatment at the National Geographic., though it doesn’t mention something pointed out in the Day: that the mass extinction of these lizards will have profound effects up and down the food chain.

Back before all of our coal mines were safe, they kept canaries in cages in the mines. If the canary died, it meant that the air was becoming unsafe to breathe. It struck me that this lizard die off is yet another dead canary, which we ignore (and we will ignore it) at our peril. By rights, it should have been the lead story in the Day and every other paper, since the long term impact of this rapid species die off will be devastating. In its own way it’s worse than the oil spill.


Bad Timing

TPM Reports:

In campaigns — like in pro-wrestling — timing is everything. And Linda McMahon (R), last seenrunning way behind in the Connecticut Senate race, is proving she’s a master of when to say just the right thing.

Fresh off news of the cataclysmic oil spill in the gulf of Mexico, McMahon recently distributed a mailer where she promised to put ‘Connecticut back to work’ by calling on the government to “increase offshore drilling and production.”

Ted Mann of The Day has the picture, which is worth at least a thousand barrels of spilled crude.

McMahon says it’s time to loosen the “burdensome regulations” that can “inhibit growth.”

Just wondering, but what burdensome regulations is she talking about. Maybe those folks at the Minerals Management Service had a rule that agency employees could only have sex with oil lobbyists of the opposite sex, or that they couldn’t use cocaine and pot at the same time.

Look at it this way, she’s a lot less stupid than that woman in Nevada, who might still end up in the Senate, and she’s probably a lot less stupid than some of the Republicans already in the Senate. With all that money, she’s still a threat, regardless of ham handed stuff like this.

Speaking of Linda, here’s required reading from the Journal Inquirer, detailing the amount she stands to gain if her call to “stop the scheduled increase in the federal tax on corporate dividends”. In one sense this is like shooting fish in a barrel. I don’t listen to radio or watch TV much, but I did hear one of her commercials and I spotted this one right away. It seemed obvious that she stood to gain millions by getting to keep her Bush era tax rates, something that wouldn’t help the rest of us at all. Still, it’s important to document the obvious sometimes.


Vindication

From the Day:

The town’s Representative Town Meeting voted Tuesday night to cut from the 2010-2011 budget any appropriation for the Groton Long Point police force.

Groton Long Point had requested $208,000, about 31 percent of its police budget, and the Groton Town Council included that request in the budget it passed last month. The request was a zero percent increase over the previous year, said Bob Congdon, president of the Groton Long Point Association.

The RTM voted 19 to 17 in favor of eliminating the town’s share of police funding. John Scott, the RTM’s finance committee chairman, who introduced the motion to cut the police funding, said the cut was made because Kelly Fogg, chief of the town’s police department, has indicated the town could provide the same level of coverage to Groton Long Point for about the amount the town currently provides, a savings of about $400,000 to Groton Long Point residents.

When I was on the RTM I proposed cutting the GLP Police budget. I got one vote-mine. When I was on the Town Council there was substantial support for cutting the Groton Long Point Police budget, until it came time to actually vote, at which point, support withered. When I ran to keep the seat I was appointed to on the council (the only election I have ever actually won) the Republicans sent this to everyone living in Groton Long Point (I probably would have been top vote getter if they’d sent it everywhere):

I was honored to be attacked, and rather proud of the quote. It would be churlish of me to note that John Scott, now a Democrat, is listed as among the Republicans who pledged to protect the police. In truth, John had nothing to do with the pamphlet and I heartily applaud him for getting this through.

But John is being a bit disingenuous when he says that Groton Long Point residents will get the same level of services if they come over to the town. Who will check to see that their doors are locked when they’re on vacation? Who will make sure that no non-residents park on their roads, or, for that matter, drive on said roads? No, I’m sure what the Groton Town Police Chief meant was that she could provide the same level of services to GLP residents that she provides to other town residents, rather than the gold plated service we town residents have been subsidizing for years.

Am I feeling vindicated? You betcha! Hard times are good for something.

A bit of background for non-Grotonites: Groton Long Point is a rich person’s enclave within the Town of Groton. Most of the homes used to be summer homes, and it made sense, years ago, for the town to give the Association a little money to help with security, since it was actually needed years ago in the winter. These days, it is a year around community, and the subsidy has ballooned from about $6,000 in the late 60s to upwards of $200,000 today. Not even inflation accounts for that increase. The police department is notorious for treating outsiders (read: anyone not from GLP, including us Grotonites who help pay their salaries) like scum and for providing private security services to residents. For years the unwritten agreement was that the town would pick up half the cost of the police force, which of course meant that the GLPers spent twice as much as they would have otherwise, all the while packing Town budget hearings with people demanding low taxes and cuts to the education budget. Now they’ll have to pay for it themselves, or make do with the same level of services the little people get.


I’m rethinking…

My support for the Audit the Fed legislation, that is. It passed the Senate 96-0.

It’s a bad sign-that unanimous vote. I’ve noticed in the past that substantive legislation that passes unanimously or near unanimously usually brings trouble. Consider the Patriot Act (though we can take some comfort from the surprisingly large numbers of Dems that voted against in 2001).

Here’s hoping the Audit the Fed act is the exception that proves the rule.


Staples out-Bysiewicz up in the air

Cam Staples has dropped out of the AG race, leaving only George Jepsen and Susan Bysiewicz standing. Unfortunately, for Susan, we also learned today that the Republicans have appealed the trial court’s decision finding her eligible to run for the office, so you might say she is only half standing.

The appeal shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone. It’s the logical thing for them to have done. The Connecticut Supreme Court (which I assume will take the case, which might on the first instance have to be filed with the Appellate Court) can expedite the process, but I don’t think they can speed it up fast enough for a decision prior to the convention. That leaves the delegates with a practical problem.

Putting aside ones views on who would make the best Attorney General, you have to consider the fact that there is some legitimate uncertainty about whether Susan is even eligible for the job. Court’s are reluctant to step in on questions of this sort, at least they have been historically, for reasons that are somewhat understandable. On the other hand it is the job of the courts, like it or not, to enforce the law, and it just may be that the court may find Susan’s active practice to have been a tad too inactive.

My bet is that she’ll win, and that it will be decided prior to the primary. The Republicans are apparently banking on the tapes or transcripts of her depositions to do her in, assuming she wins the primary. I don’t buy into that, for the simple reason that very few people will be paying attention to the AG race, and the heavy spending on the Senatorial race (I’ve been saying for months that McMahon will get it, and that now looks like a sure thing) and on the gubernatorial race, will suck the air right out of the other constitutional races. Let’s not forget those races don’t have much air even in those years when billionaires and millionaires aren’t spending money like water. Susan would have to say something a lot more damaging than an admission that she has only been to small claims court to get much attention one way or the other. That’s the way she should want it, of course. The less attention paid to the race, the more name recognition counts, and she has that in spades.

By the way, I’ve spent a lot more time in court than Susan, but I would be the last to say you need courtroom experience to be an attorney general. It’s more important that you understand the legal issues that come before you and are able to get the people working for you to advocate effectively.

All that being said, I’m leaning Jepsen.

Smart move

Well, apparently Dan Malloy has chosen Nancy Wyman as his lieutenant governor, which may certainly help to solidify his support this side of the river. Everyone likes Nancy. This could set up an interesting situation, as when the primary comes, unless I’ve been misinformed, we vote for the two offices separately. So, we Lamont supporters, if we so desire, can stick with Ned and cast a vote for Nancy in August.


A bit closer to home

Well, it’s not like New York City has made it official, nor, hopefully, has Apple, but it seems like there may be a bit of racial profiling going on at the SoHo Apple Store, complete with demands for “your papers”, all in the obviously worthy cause of keeping Ipads out of China until Apple wants them there. Odd, since that’s where they are all made.

Apple’s retail store in New York City’s SoHo neighborhood is being accused of discrimination against Chinese customers resulting from an effort to reduce the number of iPads being purchased for export. Grace Meng, a representative of Queens in the New York State Assembly, has emailed Apple after receiving a number of complaints from customers claiming that Apple employees denied them iPads, demanded to see passports, or otherwise acted inappropriately. “One person was asked why they wanted one since their English was not so good,” Meng told the Daily News. “I want to get an explanation.” In one example, a Queens man was initially told that the store was out of iPads, and was only able to secure one after seeking out an Asian employee.

I love Apple’s products, but their obsession with secrecy and control is getting a bit creepy. This may have been overzealous lower-downs, but they are just taking their cue from the corporate culture.


Peckinpaugh

It looks like the Second District Republicans may give their nomination for the Second District Congressional seat to Janet Peckinpaugh, who was, until recently, an Independent:

Peckinpaugh’s recent switch to the Republican Party shows that “she’s clearly an independent-minded person,” [NRCC spokesman Greg] Blair said. “It sounds like that makes her an interesting fit for the district.”

Well, that’s putting the best face on the Republican situation in the Second CD. There are already three actual Republicans in the race, but none of them reaches the level of mediocre. It bespeaks the bankruptcy of the party in these parts that it jumps at the chance to name a person of unknown but flexible principles in place of anyone it can find in its own ranks. If she is nominated, Peckinpaugh would be the second woman running as a Republican for federal office in this state who would be using the Republican Party as a vehicle to satisfy her personal vanity.


For Blumenthal’s consideration

Carly Fiorina’s demon sheep ad has become infamous. This ad, produced by a group called Crazy Wolf Films, is a brilliant follow up.

We can only hope that Blumenthal can find some folks capable of doing the same to Linda McMahon, because you can be sure that, once she has the Republican nomination in hand, she will roll out the attack machine against him. It’s going to be his job to introduce the real McMahon to Connecticut voters, because it’s unlikely the press will do that job.


A surprising fact

Tomorrow is Mother’s Day, and as all the world knows, motherhood, along with baseball and apple pie, is a peculiarly American value. For reasons that are unclear, the rest of the world is apparently hostile to motherhood, particularly, as it turns out, the Italians, who are producing fewer mothers than any other country on earth, despite the urgings of the Pope. (Perhaps it’s not a very good idea to talk about the Pope’s urges, so I’ll let that go). But I digress, as it is not my objective to attempt to understand why we in America have this unique regard for motherhood. Rather I write to take notice of the fact that this regard for motherhood appears to be universal in our culture, bridging the gap that divides us on so many fronts-the gap that divides us on the left and, for that matter, in the middle, from those on the right that we are constantly assured have a monopoly on “values”.

Now, given the fact that we left-wingers clearly do not have “values”, it should be safe to assume that we would reject motherhood, that unique American value, along with all the other American values that we scorn, such as torture, corporate rapacity, scientific illiteracy, Biblical fundamentalism, racism, and conviction without trial, to mention just a few. Surprisingly, this is not so.

The fact is, that many of us on the left have an astonishingly relaxed, even supportive, attitude toward motherhood. Take me for example. Like many of my other lefty friends, I have a mother, toward whom I harbor generally good feelings, particularly in her role qua mother. My wife, although not a mother when I met her, became a mother during the course of our marriage, and I not only tolerated, but approved of her change of status, which she, a confirmed lefty herself, assumed with few qualms. These are facts. My children, godless secular humanists both, share my own attitude toward mothers.

But it’s not just relatively obscure lefties that approve of motherhood. Some extremely well known leftists have joined in what many might assume would be left wing heresy. Teddy Kennedy loved his mother. It is rumored that Barack Obama (an honorary leftist, for purposes of this post) had a mother, though it is not known precisely where she achieved that status, as it appears that Obama was born in Kenya while his mother was in Hawaii. This makes her an extraordinary mother indeed. The fact is, it is hard to find a person of the leftwing persuasion that is hostile toward motherhood.

It is difficult to account for this singular fact, but it is nonetheless a fact. Despite our embrace of anti-American values such as equality, universal health care, religious tolerance, the rule of reason, and due process, we still, incomprehensibly, love our own mothers specifically, and have warm and fuzzy feelings toward the idea of motherhood generally. It is a profound and truly unfathomable situation, which would surely be the subject of much debate, were the fact more widely known.

Now, as to apple pie and baseball-well, that’s another story.

Postscript: I actually wrote this post before I assured myself that, indeed, we liberals are presumed to hate motherhood. A little googling was enough to establish that I had not underestimated our right wing friends. Consider, e.g., Another Motherhood-Hating, Traditional Gender Role-Attacking, San Fran Liberal or Phyllis Shlafley’s Feminists Consider Motherhood Oppressive. It’s actually sort of nice to know that you can always count on the right. It’s almost reassuring.