Skip to content

What we’re up against

Barack Obama will have two opponents in the fall. If he were only running against John McCain, his victory would be a sure thing. But his other opponent is the media, the only group of people in this country who think John McCain is an inspiring leader. In the end, as in 2000, they will stop at nothing to elect their favored candidate. He may be wrong about everything, but he’s been wrong about all the things they’ve been wrong about, so they love him. Besides, he gives them drinks and feeds them barbecued meat. Check out this video from Media Matters. This is CNN, not the Fox Network. Reporter Jim Acosta reports that McCain was heckled.

If that’s the kind of “incoming” that McCain has faced in the past, then those tales of heroism have, like everything else in McCain’s history, been wildly overhyped.

Obama can still win this election, but only if he realizes that his most powerful opponent is the press. A co-ordinated counteroffensive by the rest of the party is in order here. We can’t let them do to Obama what they did to Gore.

Goings on around town

Today the subject is art, food and New London, and local boosterism, not necessarily in that order. This post is mainly for any readers not from the area, and to those in the area who never set foot in New London. It’s a happening place.

New London is turning around, despite the general incompetence of its political establishment. That turnaround, at least from my perspective is being led by, or is manifested by, the vibrancy of the artistic community and the great restaurants that have sprung up on Bank Street and State Street. My wife and I are partial to Brie and Blue, card reproduced below, where you can get a great lunch, and enjoy your choice of wine or beer from the Thames Rivery Wine & Spirits. We did just that, and followed up with some great ice cream from Michael’s Dairy, just down the street.

brieblue.jpg

Right across the street from Brie and Blue is the Hygienic Art Gallery. Old time New Londoner’s know that it occupies space formerly occupied by a restaurant by that name (“Hygienic” not “Art Gallery”). Why anyone would name a restaurant “Hygienic”, unless they were very defensive, is beyond me. Anyway, the Art Gallery has been there for years, its side, facing an outdoor performance space, being a familiar landmark in New London.

hygenic.jpg

The art is sometimes a bit offbeat, but always worth the trip. We loved the current exhibit, which includes photographs of New London by Milton Moore. That’s his work on the announcement for the current show. New London never looked so good.

The Hygienic is at 79-83 Bank Street. If you get a chance stop in. This show is well worth seeing, in my humble opinion. It runs until April 20th, at which time we can go pick up the picture we bought.

hygenic-picture.jpg

Our fair City of Groton is also in the art game. Last year I wrote about Art on Groton Bank, one of whose organizers is Liberal Drinker Audrey Heard. Audrey sent along an announcement, which I’m reproducing below.

The Bill Memorial Library at 240 Monument Street in Groton City, Connecticut is again sponsoring Art on Groton Bank in its second season of a continuing festival of fine arts to be held on the library grounds on June 21, July 19, and August 16, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Join us as we recapture the joy of Paris, of its stalls along the River Seine, where artists line their works along the banks. We have modeled our exhibit on that greatest of art cities.

Last summer, our first season, was successful as we brought artists and visitors together on beautiful Groton Heights. We made it an artist’s place, where visitors mingled with painters, sculptors, graphic artists, photographers and fine arts artisans. You can not only talk the talk, meet artists, make art on site if you choose, but you can buy art. The exhibits are non-juried but attract many of the finest artists in the region including alumni, graduates and students of Lyme Academy of Fine Art. Last summer, The Wall Street Journal recommended small art shows with ties to famous art schools as the last great place to buy good art at affordable price and possibly find future masterpieces.

Groton Heights is a singular spot, a beautiful site overlooking the Thames River. It is across the road from Fort Griswold, one of two extant revolutionary war battlefields. Stroll the earthworks, picnic on the grounds. Visit the neighboring museum and the Monument. Listen to the river sounds, and enjoy the breezes on our beautiful hill top.

The welcoming and friendly Friends of the Library make delicious goodies for sale. There are nearby restaurants where food can be ordered for pick-up or eat-in. Facilities are close, as is free parking. There is no charge to visit the exhibitions.

For information or to reserve an artist’s space, please go to our website or call 860 449 0825. The exhibits are non-juried but attract many of the finest artists in the area, including alumni, graduates and students of Lyme Academy of Fine Arts.

The Library is easily accessible from I95. Take exit 87 to the first set of stop lights at Meridian Avenue. Turn right, straight through to deadend at Monument Street. Turn left, then go two short blocks to the Library. Keep your eye on the Monument. Park wherever.

In one thing we in Groton have an advantage. From Groton Bank we have a view across the river of a New London which is still fairly picturesque. Those in New London returning the favor must endure a view dominated by the ugliness of EB and Pfizer. If you direct your view with precision, toward Groton Bank itself, and resolutely ignore the hideousness of the shore directly to the right of the Bank, then it’s not so bad.

Here’s a view of the site of the Art Show from the top of the Monument (quite a trek up, as I can testify).

grton-bank-1.jpg

And here’s Audrey, in front of her own creations.

grton-bank-2.jpg

We got a great painting last summer at an incredibly low price, so what Audrey has to say about small art shows is true, at least it was in our case.

Friday Night Music-The Stones

This was a last minute choice, on the front page at Youtube, but I couldn’t resist. This is from 2006. Not bad for a bunch of old geezers.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-TCP38r6Iw[/youtube]

Murphy grandstanding on “home invasions”

Congressman Murphy wants to make home invasions a federal crime. The wave of home invasions, by my count, has now reached two in the State of Connecticut, clearly calling for a federal response. This is a stupid idea. It makes no sense, so of course it has a good chance of passing. How does making home invasion a federal crime do anything to reduce the likelihood that such crimes will occur, or increase the likelihood that these already easily caught criminals will be apprehended?

There was a time that making a federal crime out of a “home invasion” would have been seen as so obviously unconstitutional that no one would have seriously suggested it. Now, we have arrived at the point where we assume that the federal writ runs to any act, no matter that it has no obvious impact on interstate commerce or any other federal interest. The original intent was that the states would take care of ordinary criminal behavior, and that is what these “home invasions” are. Not only are they within the proper sphere of the state courts, they are more competently handled by the state courts, which are better set up to deal with them.

Murphy is making a mistake here. The federal government has better things to do than enforce state criminal law. Not only that, we are safer as a people if the federal government is forced to maintain its distance. Connecticut has had no difficulty apprehending or punishing there “home invaders”. It doesn’t need help from a U.S. Attorney who has better things to do.

Big Brother coming to Ledyard

Sometimes I’m a bit naive, I must confess. When I read this article in this morning’s Day, I was frankly puzzled:

Steve Masalin said after almost every snowstorm, residents call him to complain their roads haven’t been plowed.

“It happens frequently, almost all the time,” said Masalin, the town’s director of Public Works, on Thursday. “Plows could have been down their road one or two times but still they have an inch or two of snow in the morning.”

Mayor Fred Allyn’s proposal for funding of global positioning systems in town-owned vehicles could answer those questions.

Partly it was the bad writing (what questions had been posed that needed answers?) but mostly I was a bit mystified. Why, I wondered in my innocence, would Ledyard snow plow operators need GPS devices to find their way around Ledyard. Shouldn’t they know the roads like the back of their hands?

Gradually, it dawned on me that the point of the devices was not to aid the drivers, but to spy on them. Fittingly, Ledyard’s mayor wants to get the money to buy them from Homeland Security. It’s somewhat ironic that the police chief, who would probably not balk at spying on everyone else, isn’t quite so happy when the shoe’s on the other foot.

This is how it creeps up on us. George Orwell would recognize the world we’re creating. He had no idea how we would do it, but he knew we would do it if we could.

Another incentive for past conduct

Just got back from Drinking Liberally, where one of my fellow drinkers pointed out that the Senate is following in the footsteps of the Groton Town Council by incentivizing past behavior. You may recall that the town of Groton gave a hotel developer a tax break as an incentive to build a hotel it had already built. Today the Senate gave homebuilders a tax break that rewards them for past behavior, but gives precious little incentive for future economic activity:

In addition, [the bill] would … provide a new tax break for struggling home builders, allowing them to claim current losses against taxes paid in earlier, more profitable years. Officials said the proposals would cost taxpayers $15 billion to $20 billion, with details still being worked out.

Now, it’s certainly possible that some of these homebuilders will use that money to build more houses, generate more jobs, etc. It’s also possible that a lot of them will simply pocket the money and run. If the bill allowed them to take a credit in future years it would cost the same or less, but the taxpayers would be shelling out the money only to homebuilders that were contributing toward pulling us out of the mess we’re in. This tax break merely rewards the folks who made piles of money (you need to have made a profit in order to take advantage of this tax break) as part of the system that got us into the mess.

I’m not advocating for this alternative, I’m only saying allowing a carryover makes more sense. Neither tax break is a particularly good idea.

One more alternative global warming theory bite the dust

British scientists have debunked yet another alternative explanation for climate change:

Scientists have produced further compelling evidence showing that modern-day climate change is not caused by changes in the Sun’s activity.

The research contradicts a favoured theory of climate “sceptics”, that changes in cosmic rays coming to Earth determine cloudiness and temperature.

The idea is that variations in solar activity affect cosmic ray intensity.

But Lancaster University scientists found there has been no significant link between them in the last 20 years.

Presenting their findings in the Institute of Physics journal, Environmental Research Letters, the UK team explain that they used three different ways to search for a correlation, and found virtually none.

This is the latest piece of evidence which at the very least puts the cosmic ray theory, developed by Danish scientist Henrik Svensmark at the Danish National Space Center (DNSC), under very heavy pressure.

A quick Google search shows that, as you might expect, the folks who are unwilling to credit thousands of scientists are always willing to credit one, so long as he or she reinforces their preconceptions. Svensmark is, as the quote above states, well thought of in the denial community.

The global warming debate is one of the most mystifying of modern times. There is no religion element to it, so it can’t be compared to the evolution/creation debate. Why has the right chosen to make it an article of faith that global warming is not happening, or that if it is, it is caused by something other than the activities of man. Why this willful denial of something going on right in front of our eyes? I refuse to believe it’s merely an allegiance to Big Oil. There is something in the right wing genetic code that makes them truth resistant.

More outrage fatigue

The country is now in possession of the full text of the previously classified torture memo authored by one John Yoo, who believes that presidents named George Bush were endowed with unlimited powers by James Madison and the other fans of an untrammeled executive that authored the Constitution. Glenn Greenwald has two excellent posts
(here and here) on the “opinion” and its author, essentially arguing that it was, and was intended to be, a green light for criminal behavior. He also argues persuasively that, while they will never be called to account, Yoo and his ilk are as guilty of war crimes as any of the folks who actually conducted the torture. Ironically, he cites Injustices Scalia and Thomas in support of that contention, neither of which probably had Americans in mind when they opined that conspiracy to commit war crimes is, itself, a war crime.

If anyone needed proof that the person who is the president of the United States has a profound impact on what the country is, and how its people think, they need look no further than the presidency of George Bush. In the past seven years we have grown so inured to outrage and criminal behavior by our government that officially sanctioned torture hardly raises an eyebrow. Remember that the next time you hear Ralph Nader say that there was no difference between Gore and Bush.

Not only do we live easily with torture, we reward its proponents. Yoo’s outrageously sloppy and irresponsible legal “scholarship” got him a teaching job at Berkeley and of course other plum rewards:

The Wall St. Journal Editorial Page wanted someone to defend George Bush’s serial assertions of “Executive Privilege” to block investigations into his wrongdoing, and it turned, of course, to ex-Bush-DOJ-lawyer John Yoo, who is not only the most authoritarian but also the most partisan and intellectually dishonest lawyer in the country. Yoo is not only willing — but intensely eager — to defend literally anything George W. Bush does or would want to do, including — literally — torturing people and crushing the testicles of children if the Leader decreed that doing so was necessary to fight Terrorists. Yoo, of course, is a principal author of most of the radical executive power theories which have eroded our constitutional framework over the last six years.

Lest you think the testicle statement is hyperbole, here’s Yoo for himself:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hz01hN9l-BM[/youtube]

You might wonder, is there any limit to Presidential power in Yoo’s universe. Well, it all depends on which president you are talking about, I guess:

But this isn’t the first Op-Ed Yoo has written on the topic of Executive Privilege for theWall St. Journal. Back in 1998, when Bill Clinton was asserting the same privilege to resist Congressional demands that his closest aides testify about the President’s deliberations in responding to the various Lewinsky investigations, Yoo became one of the leading spokespeople denouncing the assertion of this privilege.

As a matter of fact, Yoo suggested that Clinton should be impeached if he defied a Congressional subpoena, something Clinton never actually did. Partisan hack that he is, Yoo is now silent about Bush’s assertions that he is free to ignore Congressional subpoenas.

People like Yoo have been embedded throughout our government. We essentially have two bodies of law, enforced by a politicized judiciary. If the Democrats manage to wrest the presidency from these people, a new set of rules will apply, articulated by the same people who have given Bush a blank check for eight years. It will be the work of a generation, if it can every be done, to restore some semblance of the rule of law.

Drink Liberally tomorrow

Yet another reminder. Every first Thursday the Southeastern Chapter of Drinking Liberally meets at the Bulkeley House in New London at 6:30 PM. We are now officially members of the national Drinking Liberally organization.

We’ve had a lot of fun at the previous meetings. It’s a chance to meet like minded folks and talk politics. So far, no Obama-Clinton wars or anything like that. Just good, clean patriotic Republican bashing.

Republican hackery, youtube style?

I was going to include a video of Bush getting booed yesterday, which I plucked from Truthdig here. It was basically a clip from the tv coverage of the game. When I tried to preview the video, I got a message that it was no longer available. I went back to Truthdig. The video played there, though I could tell it was a different video, but I assumed Truthdig had just found a new version of the same video. I copied the embed code, which, to my surprise, appeared to be precisely the same code as that which didn’t work before.
I was busily re-pasting the code in my post, only half listening to the video, when I realized it was an entirely different video. It started with video of yesterday’s game, then cut to out-takes from first pitches past, and interviews with people making laudatory comments about Bush.
Obviously, not the kind of thing Truthdig would post. Is there some way that someone can hack into youtube and replace one video with another?
In any event, I spent quite some time trying to build a post around the video, but that’s a no go now. Suffice it to say that George still doesn’t measure up to Dad, who managed to get booed at the Super Bowl. Not to say that George, Jr. couldn’t do it. He’s just had the good sense not to try.

UPDATE 2: A reader sent a substitute video link, which I posted, but I have now taken it down, because it seems to be playing havoc with the blog on Firefox. Everything looked fine in Safari, so I wasn’t aware of the problem until recently. I think the problem may also have stemmed from the fact that I was experimenting with Ecto blogging software, which I have pretty much decided to abandon.