Skip to content

Joe Courtney votes for Auto Bailout

This from an email from the prolific Brian Farber:

Congressman Joe Courtney released the following statement this evening after voting in favor of H.R. 7321, the Auto Industry Financing and Restructuring Act, which passed by a vote of 237-170:

“‘Main Street’ is hurting and Connecticut’s hard working individuals are feeling the brunt of the economic recession. There are approximately three hundred auto dealerships, mostly family-owned small businesses, throughout the state employing nearly 14,000 people, many of them in my own district. I cannot in good conscience allow those dealerships to close without a fight, forcing more of our neighbors and friends to the unemployment lines. Last week, we lost four auto dealerships to this credit crunch.”

“Allowing these American industries to slip into bankruptcy and collapse would put the jobs of three million Americans at risk. The repercussions of massive job losses would be felt across this nation and Connecticut and would be unacceptable at this time of peril for our economy. Jeopardizing our industrial base also has implications for our national security production, a threat I take seriously as a member of the House Armed Services Committee.”
“While the Big Three automakers have made progress in innovation in some areas, they have also botched numerous opportunities to advance hybrid technologies and more fuel efficient vehicles. However, the blame also rests in Washington, where it took thirty years to find a willing Congress to increase fuel efficiency standards. I was proud to vote to raise auto fuel standards to 35 miles per gallon – long overdue, and a feat considering the White House and the auto manufacturers opposed the measure.”

“The loan from already approved funding serves as a bridge for the American automakers to survive while requiring companies to restructure their businesses in order to regain their competitive advantage. Detroit executives will not be able to profit with a golden parachute, unlike the Wall Street bailout that carried no penalty for the financial industry’s failings and irresponsible behavior.”

“Taxpayers are protected. Oversight and transparency are at the core of this loan to the auto industry and is clearly laid out, unlike the Wall Street bailout that I voted against twice that has zero accountability and very little oversight.”

“I carefully studied other options, including bankruptcy for the industry, but in the end, bankruptcy would be more costly and not viable because of the larger expense, the hundreds of thousands of lost jobs and will create a generation of Americans who refuse to purchase American made cars and trucks. The lost confidence may never be regained.”

No one is particularly happy about these bailouts, and I’m not quarreling with Joe’s decision. He’s a freshman and had no ability to influence the contents of the bill on which he voted. But it’s worth noting that the lamest of lame ducks rolled the Democratic Congress once again. The money is coming from the funds allocated from the Energy Independence and Security Act, funds that were supposed to be used to develop fuel efficient cars. Pelosi said she wouldn’t go along with that. She caved. The Democrats wanted a provision requiring the auto makers to withdraw lawsuits against states that imposed stringent air quality standards. Bush wanted to let the suits go on and threatened a veto. The Democrats caved.

As to the latter, did it occur to the Democrats to contact the auto makers and say: Yes, Bush will veto any bill with such a provision. But we won’t pass any bill until you voluntarily withdraw the suits with prejudice, thus mooting the issue.

No, I’m sure this never occurred to them. They were set to cave from the start.


Obama is serious about dealing with global warming

There’s been a lot of talk throughout the blogosphere that Obama’s appointments have been too centrist. So far nothing he’s done has made me overly concerned. I’m willing to give him the benefit of the doubt.

The one thing I’ve always worried about was his commitment to combatting the climate crisis. This is the overriding issue of our times, so naturally it is the kind of issue from which all politicians run.

Today we hear that he is likely to appoint Steven Chu, a Nobel Prize winning physicist as his Energy Secretary, and Carol Browner, a global warming wonk, as his energy coordinator. These are serious people who actually accept the facts about global warming and want to do something about it.

How refreshing.


Mercenaries Ahoy

Blackwater, the mercenary army made rich by George Bush, is now planning to go into the pirate fighting business. Via Thinkprogress:

Private security firm Blackwater Worldwide began holding meetings in London on Tuesday with potential clients for a new business venture — protection from pirates.

The Moyock, N.C., firm, which has grown rapidly through State Department security work in Iraq, has been courting shippers and insurance firms about protecting ships in pirate-infested waters. It’s meeting with more than a dozen firms this week and hopes to drum up its first contract.

It is remarkable that the rise of private armies has raised so few hackles around the world. I remember, in those naive days of my youth, being taught that governments had a monopoly on the use of force. That’s the civilized way, or as civilized as it gets. We now treat private armies as just another business.

This will come to no good. That’s obvious. I suppose when we reap the whirlwind on this one we’ll hear a chorus telling us that no one could have seen it coming.


Specter wants to delay Holder vote

Arlen Specter is trying to put the brakes on Eric Holder’s nomination to be Attorney General. According to Specter, Holder’s involvement in the Marc Rich pardon warrants close scrutiny:

But Specter is already applying the brakes, indicating that Republicans are going to make a big deal out of Holder at the hearing. Specter said he sees no way in which the Holder hearings could happen before Jan. 26. Specter said he still needs to see thousands of pages of background documents and Holder’s FBI background check.

“There are questions that need to be addressed,” Specter said in a Senate floor speech.

Specter, a former prosecutor himself, said he was troubled that Holder did not stand up to President Clinton on the pardon of Rich, who was a fugitive living abroad at the time of the pardon.

“To run counter to the views of the [law enforcement] professionals is a red flag,” Specter said. “We’re looking at a very, very serious matter.”

That pardon was not Clinton’s finest hour, or Holder’s either, I’m sure. It will be interesting to see if Specter carries through with his threat. This is they guy who made a habit of making noises about standing up against Bush’s destruction of the Constitution, only to back down or worse every time. Take the FISA situation, for instance. He started out by calling Bush’s actions illegal; he ended up legalizing them.

When Alberto Gonzales was nominated for Attorney General, Specter bought in to his transparent lies about his involvement in the Bush legal department’s torture legalization strategy. Perhaps it’s more accurate to say that he claimed to buy into those transparent lies.

It was Specter who was responsible for slipping the language into the revised “Patriot” Act that allowed Bush to try to name interim U.S. Attorneys without confirmation hearings, despite his denials. That act led directly to the U.S. Attorney scandal of a few year back.

The Marc Rich pardon was small beer compared to all of this. So one must wonder, after eight years of spineless subservience to a lawless Administration, has Specter suddenly grown a backbone? Does he really believe an ill considered pardon is worse than torture? More to the point, will the Democrats let him get away with it? They couldn’t stop a torturer from becoming Attorney General. Are they going to let a torture enabler stop, or even appreciably delay Holder’s confirmation?

That, of course, is the more fundamental question here. The Democrats are not going to have 60 seats. In any event, make no mistake, they cannot count on Joe Lieberman. The Republicans had a slender majority the last time they controlled the Senate. Can you think of a single instance where the threat of a filibuster prevented them from wreaking their havoc on the nation? Maybe there was something, but it had to have been incredibly minor. This idea that you need 60 votes to get anything done in the Senate is only operative when Democrats are in control, and only because they won’t play hard ball with the Republicans. Maybe that will change now, but I wouldn’t hold my breath.


One Frankenstein, Two Monsters

John McCain is gone, but Sarah Palin, lives on. If worse comes to worst, McCain may live on in history as the man who gave a dangerous demagogue her start on the national stage.

McCain also gave us Joe the Plumber, and like Frankenstein’s monster, he has turned on his creator:

When I was on the bus with him, I asked him a lot of questions about the bailout because most Americans did not want that to happen. Yet he voted for it. … And I asked him some pretty direct questions. Some of the answers you guys are gonna receive — they appalled me, absolutely. I was angry. In fact I wanted to get off the bus after I talked to him.

He may not like McCain, but he loves his fellow creature, Sarah:

Wurzelbacher said he supported McCain only because he was “kinda the lesser of two evils.” However, his criticism of McCain didn’t extend to his running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-AK). “Sarah Palin is absolutely the real deal,” he said.

Even Victor Frankenstein didn’t foist two monsters on a helpless world. Victor had a conscience, so he dedicated himself to destroying his inhuman creation. Don’t expect McCain to follow his example.


Have yourself a very broccoli Christmas

People are amazing.


Department of You Can’t Make This Stuff Up-Blagojevich/Craig Edition

This is one of those times when I feel my own inadequacies as a writer with a peculiar intensity. How to do justice to the staggeringly audacious corruption of Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich? Might I first observe that he makes John Rowland look like a piker-a rank amateur?

How, one wonders, did this guy ever get to be governor of Illinois? Alaska maybe, but Illinois? I’m not just talking about corruption. After all, he succeeded a guy who is now cooling his heels in jail, so the corruption part is to be expected. No, it’s the utter stupidity that is Alaskan in its scope. Sarah Palin couldn’t do better. Here’s a guy who knew he was under investigation, knew he was being wiretapped, yet has the bright idea of selling a seat in the United States Senate to the highest bidder. And not just any seat. No, this particular seat is the one being vacated by the man about to be president. And if initial reports are to be credited, it’s entirely possible that he demanded payment from the new President’s organization. Personally, if I knew that Pat Fitzgerald had me in his sights I would be one very careful person.

This brings me back to my original point. How do you do this stuff justice. No one could make this up. This is Mel Brooks country, and only someone like Brooks, at the height of his powers, could truly do it justice.

Meanwhile, while this “tragical-comical-historical” play begins, a straight farce has come to an end:

The Minnesota Court of Appeals has turned down Sen. Larry Craig’s effort to undo his guilty plea, scuttling the Idaho Republican’s argument that the plea wasn’t valid because he’d mailed it in rather than appearing in court in person.

Some may be cheered by this development, but we First Amendment absolutists are in despair:

The appellate court also was unsympathetic to Craig’s argument that his conduct in the bathroom that day was protected by free speech. The disorderly conduct statutes are not overly broad, the court found, because the law requires that someone who’s charged with such an offense be aware that his or her language or conduct could arouse “alarm, anger or resentment” in others.

Craig will be a Senator for a few more weeks. During that time he could do his bit to protect our constitutional rights by introducing a bill protecting the rights of all Americans to solicit sex in a bathroom. If it ever came to a vote it might be the first time he actually voted in favor of individual rights (not counting guns, of course), assuming one agrees with his premise that bathroom solicitation is a protected activity.

In any event, we have seen the last of Craig. Or have we?

“I maintain my innocence, and currently my attorneys and I are reviewing the decision and looking into the possibility of appealing,” Craig said.


A GGGer goes after the GLP PD

Looks like we may see some internecine warfare within the GGG PAC. For you non-Grotonites, that’s the Groton Good Government Pac. Don’t be fooled by the name. Their objective is to destroy good government, especially the schools. They are against government spending in all its forms, but have normally been fairly quiet about spending that benefits the folks at Groton Long Point, where most of them live.

Apparently that’s not the case anymore. Ed Johnson, a member of the PAC (but not a resident of Groton Long Point), has written to Mayor Harry Watson suggesting that just possibly we might look at the largesse the town has thrown toward Groton Long Point in the form of subsidies of its police force:

At the risk of offending some of my friends in the Groton Long Point area, I feel it also necessary to make the following comments and recommendations.

1) I believe there are line items where, if I am correct, the Town of Groton contributes approximately $400,000 annually to GLP for purposes of (a) road maintenance ($200,000) and (b) GLP police protection ($200,000). This means that a portion of my taxes are actually being directed towards expenses for an area of town that benefits a certain group of citizens but in no way benefits the rest of us either directly or indirectly…unless we want to go sightseeing.

2) I therefore suggest that the contribution for GLP Road maintenance be substantially reduced for next year. Fill the potholes. GLP has a 25 MPH speed limit anyway and slightly lumpy roads won’t affect the situation very much. Additionally, there won’t be any need for speed bumps or humps, as we (unfortunately) have in Noank.

3) The citizens of GLP have also chosen for years to have their own (private?) police force. By observation, and as confirmed by a recent DAY newspaper article, the citizens of GLP are apparently delighted they have these services…such as checking on houses while owners are away in Florida…and very much want them to continue. This, by itself, is fine…just as long as the costs for same are to be paid by GLP residents and not the rest of the Citizens of Groton.

4) I therefore request that the approximately $200,000 annually that is paid to GLP by the TOG be withdrawn completely, which will leave the GLP citizens two choices:

a) pay 100% of their costs for having their own Police Force, or

b) eliminate the GLP force, replace it with a private security force to provide key service, etc., (again, at their own cost) and simply add the GLP territory to the existing Town police patrol that already covers Noank and Mumford Cove.

The Town is required to pay a share of the roads budget for GLP, but it’s not required to pay a cent toward the cops.

When I was on the RTM I represented (in theory, I guess) the folks at Groton Long Point. Nonetheless, I proposed deleting the GLP police appropriation. I got a second to my motion, but only for purposes of discussion. I couldn’t garner a single vote.

When I was on the council I tried to do the same thing, or at least cut the appropriation. Some of my fellow councilors actually expressed support, until the time came to vote, when their resolution failed. A few year ago, if memory serves, the GLP police got a double digit increase when everyone else was restricted to about 3%. I have yet to hear anyone give a principled explanation (or for that matter, an un-principled one) for this ridiculous subsidy. The usual reason for spending the money is that “we’ve always done it”. Take that back, some of them insist that subsidizing the private cops is a cost effective alternative to providing town police services, but that bogus argument was put to rest by a study the town police chief did at our request when I was on the council, and I strongly suspect that his estimates for the costs of patrolling GLP were on the extremely high side. (They were still lower than the subsidy).

So, I’m happy to see that Mr. Johnson sees the light, at least on this one subject. It will be very interesting to see if his fellow PAC members agree with him or whether they prefer to concentrate on cutting school budgets. After all, many of them no doubt take vacations.

Footnote: I won’t identify the person who sent Mr. Johnson’s email to me. I think I’m within my rights to reproduce it here, and to identify him by name, because it was sent to, among others, Harry Watson, other members of the Town Council, and RTM members in their official capacities. It is therefore a public document.


Tribune Company files for bankruptcy

My wife and I stopped getting the Hartford Courant two or three months ago. We had been thinking about it for a long time, and finally took the step when we found out we could get the Boston Globe delivered to our home. Over the last few years the Courant has declined dramatically. It is not quite a tabloid, but it’s certainly getting there. They just love them some crime, and nothing’s better than trying to whip up fear.

Still, it is sad to hear that the Courant’s “parent” company has just filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The Tribune Company has been struggling under the load of debt that Sam Zell incurred when he bought the company in the first place.

Okay, I’m no economist, but I’ve never been able to figure out how a company that was not doing that well in the first place could prosper when it was called upon to repay a purchase money mortgage on itself, in addition to paying the normal bills.

In any event, I truly hope the Courant is able to survive. It would be nice if some liberal Connecticut multi-millionaire would buy the Courant, make it an independent newspaper once again, and bring it back to the standard of excellence it once attained.

Newspapers are going through some wrenching times. They may not survive as producers of physical objects: i.e., actual newspapers. But we do need an independent press-one not totally in the pocket of corporate conglomerates for whom “news” is a commodity no different than soap. It’s not at all clear that an economic model will develop in the internet age that will allow journalists to ply their trade, truly educate the public, and make money. It’s not likely that it will be the large corporations that will find a way to do that.


Andrew Sullivan is still wondering

Before I was so rudely interrupted by my broken computer, I had intended to draw the attention of my readers to Andrew Sullivan’s lonely battle to find out the truth about Sarah Palin’s recent pregnancy.

As faithful readers may recall, there is a great deal of circumstantial evidence pointing to the possibility that the child was her daughter’s, and not hers. When the rumors first started percolating through the internet the Palin folks decided to debunk them by revealing that the daughter was now pregnant, rather than by, for instance, releasing medical records demonstrating that Palin really was pregnant. Such records have never been released, and Sullivan reports that there is no record of the birth at the hospital where the baby was allegedly born. He also has pictures of a rather svelte looking Palin three weeks before the baby was born.

The story has been widely dismissed by the right wing, which normally loves a conspiracy theory. But the facts are strange. The pregnancy was announced very late. Her water broke in Texas but she decided to go to Wasilla to have the baby, an incredibly reckless thing to do. Her daughter had been out of school for months prior to the birth, etc. Sullivan says:

Actually, the Dish went out and interviewed eight of the leading obstetricians in the country and laid out all the facts of the case and asked the experts for their take. While none would say that this pregnancy could not have happened, and none would comment on a case they hadn’t examined personally, all of them said it was one of the strangest and unlikeliest series of events they had ever heard of and found Palin’s decision to forgo medical help for more than a day after her water broke and risk the life of her unborn child on a long airplane trip to be reckless beyond measure.

If we could be sure that Palin would fade away in the frozen North, none of this would matter. But the fact is, she is rarin’ to go in 2012, and there’s a real possibility that she will be the next big thing, demagogue wise. The press was decidedly uninterested in this story, and will probably remain so unless…. Well, unless little Bristol doesn’t have a baby after all, or if it arrives too late to have been in the oven when the last one was born.

If Sullivan’s suspicions are correct, and I think there’s a good chance that they are, exposure might sidetrack the Palin movement. Whether that’s good or not depends on your perspective. Some folks think she would lead the GOP into a train wreck. I’m not so sure. Better to be safe than sorry, so if her political future can be derailed by a story like this, all the better.