Skip to content

Friday Night Music Briefly returns

After all, he won the Nobel Prize. I don’t know if he deserved it, but he didn’t not deserve it, if you know what I mean. It’s not all that easy to find acceptable videos of Dylan doing his own music, especially from the early days. I had to reject what I could find of a few other songs before settling on this one.

I guess we’ll never know who Mr. Jones was, but most of us can rest assured that it’s somebody else.

And for anyone who thinks Dylan didn’t deserve the prize because half of his songs are incomprehensible, all I can say is try reading T.S. Eliot.

The Donald Implodes

All of this stuff about Trump would be really funny if there wasn’t still a chance he could win. (This is America, after all. Remember what P.T. Barnum said) But, even so, it’s still funny. A few random observations today.

In the “even a stopped clock” department: I came across this about Steve Bannon, the CEO of Donald Trump’s campaign, referring to scammer Paul Ryan:

“Ryan’s agenda is not in line with the American worker. It’s in line with the Wall Street wing of the permanent political class,” the source close to Bannon said.

via Down with Tyranny quoting the Hill

It’s hard to argue with that, though what he thinks Donald Trump would do about it is a mystery.

But, that’s not really all that funny, just more of the same from the Trump campaign. What is funny, at least to anyone with a law degree, is the letter that Donald’s lawyers sent to the New York Times after the Times published what is now the first of many stories about women coming forward with stories about Donald (looks like it’s going full Cosby).

Here’s the last paragraph:

We hereby demand that you immediately cease any further publication of this article, remove it from your website and issue a full and immediate retraction and apology. Failure to do so will leave my client with no option but to pursue all available actions and remedies. (Emphasis added)

Any lawyer worth his or her salt can translate that last line for you. It means: If you don’t retract that article, we won’t do a damn thing, because we know we have no case.

Even Jake Tapper, who, so far as I know, is not a lawyer, saw through it. (It’s on Twitter, but I can’t seem to get a usable link) The Times lawyers did too, and I can assure you they had a splendid time penning this response. I particularly enjoyed this paragraph, which makes the obvious point that Trump has no reputation worth protecting:

The essence of a libel claim, of course, is the protection of one’s reputation. Mr. Trump has bragged about his non-consensual sexual touching of women. He has bragged about intruding on beauty contestants in their dressing rooms. He acquiesced to a radio host’s request to discuss Mr. Trump’s own daughter as a “piece of ass.” Multiple women not mentioned in our article have publicly come forward to report on Mr. Trump’s unwanted advances. Nothing in our article has had the slightest effect on the reputation that Mr. Trump, through his own words and actions, has already created for himself.

Whew! And just imagine how much fun they’d have doing discovery.

I don’t have proof, but I’d hazard a guess that Donald Trump only sues down: people and businesses that don’t have the financial wherewithal to defend against a phalanx of lawyers. He’ll never sue the Times. They know it, and he knows it. But if he really decides to do so, I’d advise his lawyers to get a hefty retainer up front, because after they lose they’ll never get a dime out of him.

Trump’s supporters explained

I think Juan Cole is on to something. He asks, why would anyone back Trump? His answer is persuasive, and worth reading, which you can do here.

His argument is that Trump’s adherents, particularly the men, want to be Trump. Read the whole thing, but here’s a taste:

But I nevertheless think that the men who back Trump no matter what are doing so because the celebrity real estate speculator and name-licenser provides them with an opportunity for ego inflation. By backing Trump , they are participating vicariously in the wealthy businessman’s persona. They can imagine themselves in the stretch limousine, they can imagine themselves putting China’s Xi Jinping in his place, they imagine never again paying taxes, they can imagine themselves having cocktails with models in the penthouse, perhaps the most despicable of them wish they could assault women with impunity.

There is, of course, no single explanation, but I do think that this is on the money with respect to a lot of Trump’s supporters. Sort of pathetic, really.

He’s got my vote

Well, not really.

I have fond memories of the Spaceman, Bill Lee, former Red Sox pitcher. It is my firm belief that when the Red Sox went into their 1978 tailspin, which ended in the infamous Bucky Dent homer (may his name forever live in infamy), Bill Lee could have stopped the slide had the gerbil, Don Zimmer, not benched him. Toward the end there, he was the only one loose enough to do the job.

Bill is long since retired. This year he is running for governor of Vermont, as you can read here. He’s running as the Liberty Union candidate, and he’s running an old fashioned campaign, as in the type of hands off campaign people like Jefferson used to pretend to run. No campaign appearances, no fund raising, no nothing really, except appearing at debates. The Republican candidate has insisted he be present, presumably figuring that any votes he gets will come out of the Democratic candidate, but that’s not really all that clear.

The Spaceman’s platform is pretty incoherent, but I loved this line:

I don’t believe in hand guns. I have a 36-caliber Colt conversion Jesse James gun. I couldn’t hit jack diddley with that thing, you know? But it will kill close range,” Lee said. “If you’re afraid, go out and get two grey geese, put them on your front steps and I guarantee you no one’s going to come up to your front door without you knowing about. We don’t need more guns, we need more geese. Thank you.”

Now, this just shows how highly educated (or well read) Lee is. He was undoubtedly making an allusion to ancient Rome, the citizens of which were, in fact, warned that someone was at their front door (or maybe the back door) by Juno’s sacred geese. The Gauls were turned back. Rome was saved. The Roman Republic (like all Republics?) eventually collapsed, but it gave way to Imperial Rome, which gave us Christianity and the Dark Ages, which eventually gave us the Renaissance and Protestantism, which gave us dueling persecutions, but also gave us the Age of Reason, which fizzled out pretty rapidly, giving way to fascism, nationalism, racism, authoritarianism, and capitalism with a heaping helping of global warming on the side.

We owe a lot to those geese.

The Great Debate

By any reasonable measure, Hillary “won” the debate yesterday. My general sense is that while the mainstream media wanted to give it to Donald, they’ve been restrained by the reactions of ordinary people. The Donald was not a pleasant person to look at last night, and Hillary must have been a bit creeped out as he stalked her on stage. I guess she could take comfort in the fact that it wasn’t likely he was going to grab her … on live TV.

One criticism of Hillary. I don’t think she should be so quick to apologize for her “deplorables” comment. If she wants to admit that maybe she got the percentages wrong, that’s fine, but she should absolutely maintain that not only is Donald deplorable, but the KKKers, racists, religious bigots, etc., that make up his fan base are in fact deplorable. That is a fact. There’s a world of difference between what she said about Trump’s foot soldiers and what Romney said about Americans in general.

A minor quibble however.

One more quibble: she should have needled him directly about the Republicans withdrawing their endorsements. She alluded to it, but not sufficiently that he even noticed. Had she thrown that pie in his face, I think we would have seen a real meltdown.

Why now?

It’s been a remarkable 24 hours. It’s been about that long since this happened:

(Couldn’t resist putting it up again. I think it’s brilliant)

Since the recording was released, Republicans first went with the tried and true “I condemn what he said, but I’m still voting for him” shtick, but as the day went on, they started an almost lemming like desertion of the good ship Trump. (I’ll be abusing the ship metaphor throughout this post, so keep it in mind)

The question is: why? Is there really a qualitative difference between what we hear on the tape and what we’ve been hearing ever since he announced? Well, there is, and while the mainstream hasn’t either recognized the anomaly or sought to explain it, many on the internet have. One of the best discussions I’ve seen is here, by Josh Marshall:

We can’t say the emergence of this tape was predictable. But the behavior is not at all surprising based on what we already knew. Indeed, I would almost say this whole line of reasoning is offensive, in this sense: Sexual assault is terrible. But it’s hardly the only terrible thing that has been dredged up by this election. What about the campaigns of hate and occasional violence spurred by this campaign? Just yesterday I wrote about how Trump has done more to normalize anti-Semitism in American public life than anyone in decades. I wrote about this because it is something I know from personal experience. But Trump’s entire campaign has been explicitly about demonizing Hispanics and American Muslims – subjecting them to escalating campaigns of hate, harassment and in some cases actual violence. Meanwhile African-Americans have served as his stage props, sometimes being targeted with racist attacks and other times as powerless non-people who only Trump can save. Is all this stuff just a cost of doing business? Sexual assault and sexual violence of all sorts is one of the most pressing issues in our society today. But it is hard not to conclude that the revelation of this tape is considered a step too far because women are a critical demographic that is in play in the election and secondarily because the politicians have wives and daughters. Most of those wives and daughters aren’t black or Jews or Hispanic or Muslim or people from any of the other groups Trump has stepped on on his way to the nomination.

I think Josh is largely right. The reaction strikes me as a variant of an “effect” I’ve named after a former Republican legislator from our area. I won’t name her here, as there’s no reason to do so. She was a down the line typical Republican, with one exception. She vigourously supported increased spending for people with intellectual disabilities. Need I mention that she had a son who was intellectually disabled? So it is entirely possible that the Republicans are abandoning Trump in part because they can see their wives and daughters in his victims. In other words, this time it affects them personally.

But I think there’s another force at play here. The Beltway media has, to a greater or lesser extent, sent a message that, for reasons unknown, in this particular tape Trump has crossed a bridge too far. Again, there’s the message sent sub silentio that his attacks on minorities may be tacky, but not wholly disqualifying. I’ve complained before about the tendency of Democratic politicians to believe that the Washington punditry somehow has its fingers on the pulse of the American people, when it’s so clear it does not. This time, I think the Republicans have fallen into that trap. They’ve bought into the punditry’s take on the American people, forgetting that even if it accurately described the majority of Americans, it doesn’t describe any of Trump’s supporters. This revelation will not lose Trump the support of 1/1000th of his current supporters. It will probably not sway many undecideds in his direction, but for the Republicans, that’s almost irrelevant. Each and every Republican candidate needs for those Trumpists to keep checking the R box in the downticket. If they decide to stop with Trump, the rest of the Rs are doomed. We’re already seeing the Republican mobs booing the Republican candidates that are withdrawing their support from the orange man, and Trump has not yet addressed himself to these turncoats.

Here’s a prediction I’m making with about 60% confidence. If the lemmings keep jumping, Trump will want to make sure that they drown, and to do that, he’ll have no qualms about bringing the entire party down with him. He is sure as hell not going to bow out. Only losers do that. A few words from him, and his followers will boycott the down ticket in any race in which the candidate has been insufficiently supportive. When he does lose, the lemmings won’t be able to pick up the pieces, because the true believers, who are, after all, a majority of the Republican base, will believe them to be traitors to the cause. So look for Trump to start attacking his fellow Republicans. I understand he’s already removed Mike Pence’s schedule from his website. If he’s going to lose, he’s going to make sure the ship goes down with him. From a tactical perspective, baling on Trump now is a stupid move for any Republican candidate. Since we can take as a given that none of them are really doing it as a matter of principle, we must conclude that most of them are stupid, or have been taken in by the stupid.

Daily News having fun

Can’t help but agree that this is a funny front page.

The Daily News used to be fairly right wing, but I guess they saw an opening when Murdoch took over the Post. Anyway, this ranks up there with that Newt Gingrich front page from years ago.

Debate watching event

The Groton Democratic Town Committee will be hosting a debate watching event at its headquarters at 774 Long Hill Road in Groton on Sunday. It starts whenever the debate starts, I guess. We have one of those giant TVs. It’s a pot-luck affair, so anyone who brings food will be quite welcome. It is not a fundraiser, something I can say with confidence, as I’m the treasurer. No suggested donation, etc. We’re getting together just to have fun and see if Donald Trump can restrain himself from grabbing anyone’s crotch.

An interesting legal question

My wife and I own property in Chester, Vermont, so I have the Chester Telegraph‘s newsfeed on my RSS reader.

Chester is right down the road from Grafton, where they used to make Grafton cheeses. That’s right, the factory is gone, as is the outlet shop, leaving nary a thing behind. It did not, however, go to China, but down Route 91 to Brattleboro.

I digress.

Grafton is currently being torn by controversy about a proposed wind farm that a foreign corporation is proposing to build in the area. The voters will decide whether the project will go forward on election day in November.

The company recently sweetened the deal it was offering. It has offered yearly payments to every registered voter in the affected communities. One letter writer estimates he would realize $23,240 over the life of the deal.

The Attorney General’s office has ruled that the offer doesn’t violate applicable state law, which reads as follows:

A person who attempts by bribery, threats or any undue influence to dictate, control or alter the vote of a freeman about to be given at a general election shall be fined not more than $200.00.

Of course, I don’t practice in Vermont, and I’m not an expert in election law, but I respectfully disagree. I should add that as a property owner I don’t have a vote, nor do I actually have an opinion, as I can see both sides of the wind farm issue. Anyway, although Chester is close to the action, it’s not close enough, and it’s residents have no say in the matter.

But, back to the legal point, I think where they go wrong is offering the payments to each registered voter, rather than to each resident. If the point is to make the community a “partner”, as the company suggests, then every resident, regardless of whether he or she is a registered voter, should get a cut. By offering the cash to registered voters, they are clearly singling out the very people who will decide the fate of their project for bribes partnership payments, while leaving similarly affected people with nothing. Plus, there’s really no question but that the whole point of the bribes proposed payments is to sway people’s votes, particularly as the offer was made just a few weeks before what is clearly looking like a very close vote. There’s no question that the offer never would have been made if a favorable outcome were certain, so can there really be any question but that the payment is being offered to “alter the vote” of the voters?

Is there a way to resign?

As a white male, I find it rather disheartening that I am a member of the only demographic that supports Donald Trump, unless you count white people generally, but that’s a bit unfair to white women. You have to wonder, is there something in the DNA of white males that makes them particularly susceptible to small handed con-men? Why is my demographic the only one that can’t seem to see through the Donald, in particular, and in general, can’t seem to vote in its own interest? I mean, to paraphrase a song by the great Louis Armstrong, “What did we do, to be so white and dumb?”.

So, I ask, is there a way to resign from a demographic? Can I make myself an honorary something else?

I guess I’ll just have to content myself with the knowledge that the genetic flaw that runs in the genes of most white men, does not run in mine. Cold comfort, for my wife has pointed out a disturbing pattern among members of my demographic as they pass farther and farther into geezerdom, as I am currently doing. We remember so well the lifelong local Democrats who became weirdly conservative as they passed into senescence.

Still, it doesn’t happen to everyone, and I’m sure I’m proof against it. My genes may be compromised, but my will is strong.

Hey! Wait! Is that Fox News playing on that television? You know, sometimes they make a lot of sense, especially that Bill O’Reilly. I think I’ll watch for a while.