Skip to content

Why now?

It’s been a remarkable 24 hours. It’s been about that long since this happened:

(Couldn’t resist putting it up again. I think it’s brilliant)

Since the recording was released, Republicans first went with the tried and true “I condemn what he said, but I’m still voting for him” shtick, but as the day went on, they started an almost lemming like desertion of the good ship Trump. (I’ll be abusing the ship metaphor throughout this post, so keep it in mind)

The question is: why? Is there really a qualitative difference between what we hear on the tape and what we’ve been hearing ever since he announced? Well, there is, and while the mainstream hasn’t either recognized the anomaly or sought to explain it, many on the internet have. One of the best discussions I’ve seen is here, by Josh Marshall:

We can’t say the emergence of this tape was predictable. But the behavior is not at all surprising based on what we already knew. Indeed, I would almost say this whole line of reasoning is offensive, in this sense: Sexual assault is terrible. But it’s hardly the only terrible thing that has been dredged up by this election. What about the campaigns of hate and occasional violence spurred by this campaign? Just yesterday I wrote about how Trump has done more to normalize anti-Semitism in American public life than anyone in decades. I wrote about this because it is something I know from personal experience. But Trump’s entire campaign has been explicitly about demonizing Hispanics and American Muslims – subjecting them to escalating campaigns of hate, harassment and in some cases actual violence. Meanwhile African-Americans have served as his stage props, sometimes being targeted with racist attacks and other times as powerless non-people who only Trump can save. Is all this stuff just a cost of doing business? Sexual assault and sexual violence of all sorts is one of the most pressing issues in our society today. But it is hard not to conclude that the revelation of this tape is considered a step too far because women are a critical demographic that is in play in the election and secondarily because the politicians have wives and daughters. Most of those wives and daughters aren’t black or Jews or Hispanic or Muslim or people from any of the other groups Trump has stepped on on his way to the nomination.

I think Josh is largely right. The reaction strikes me as a variant of an “effect” I’ve named after a former Republican legislator from our area. I won’t name her here, as there’s no reason to do so. She was a down the line typical Republican, with one exception. She vigourously supported increased spending for people with intellectual disabilities. Need I mention that she had a son who was intellectually disabled? So it is entirely possible that the Republicans are abandoning Trump in part because they can see their wives and daughters in his victims. In other words, this time it affects them personally.

But I think there’s another force at play here. The Beltway media has, to a greater or lesser extent, sent a message that, for reasons unknown, in this particular tape Trump has crossed a bridge too far. Again, there’s the message sent sub silentio that his attacks on minorities may be tacky, but not wholly disqualifying. I’ve complained before about the tendency of Democratic politicians to believe that the Washington punditry somehow has its fingers on the pulse of the American people, when it’s so clear it does not. This time, I think the Republicans have fallen into that trap. They’ve bought into the punditry’s take on the American people, forgetting that even if it accurately described the majority of Americans, it doesn’t describe any of Trump’s supporters. This revelation will not lose Trump the support of 1/1000th of his current supporters. It will probably not sway many undecideds in his direction, but for the Republicans, that’s almost irrelevant. Each and every Republican candidate needs for those Trumpists to keep checking the R box in the downticket. If they decide to stop with Trump, the rest of the Rs are doomed. We’re already seeing the Republican mobs booing the Republican candidates that are withdrawing their support from the orange man, and Trump has not yet addressed himself to these turncoats.

Here’s a prediction I’m making with about 60% confidence. If the lemmings keep jumping, Trump will want to make sure that they drown, and to do that, he’ll have no qualms about bringing the entire party down with him. He is sure as hell not going to bow out. Only losers do that. A few words from him, and his followers will boycott the down ticket in any race in which the candidate has been insufficiently supportive. When he does lose, the lemmings won’t be able to pick up the pieces, because the true believers, who are, after all, a majority of the Republican base, will believe them to be traitors to the cause. So look for Trump to start attacking his fellow Republicans. I understand he’s already removed Mike Pence’s schedule from his website. If he’s going to lose, he’s going to make sure the ship goes down with him. From a tactical perspective, baling on Trump now is a stupid move for any Republican candidate. Since we can take as a given that none of them are really doing it as a matter of principle, we must conclude that most of them are stupid, or have been taken in by the stupid.

Daily News having fun

Can’t help but agree that this is a funny front page.

The Daily News used to be fairly right wing, but I guess they saw an opening when Murdoch took over the Post. Anyway, this ranks up there with that Newt Gingrich front page from years ago.

Debate watching event

The Groton Democratic Town Committee will be hosting a debate watching event at its headquarters at 774 Long Hill Road in Groton on Sunday. It starts whenever the debate starts, I guess. We have one of those giant TVs. It’s a pot-luck affair, so anyone who brings food will be quite welcome. It is not a fundraiser, something I can say with confidence, as I’m the treasurer. No suggested donation, etc. We’re getting together just to have fun and see if Donald Trump can restrain himself from grabbing anyone’s crotch.

An interesting legal question

My wife and I own property in Chester, Vermont, so I have the Chester Telegraph‘s newsfeed on my RSS reader.

Chester is right down the road from Grafton, where they used to make Grafton cheeses. That’s right, the factory is gone, as is the outlet shop, leaving nary a thing behind. It did not, however, go to China, but down Route 91 to Brattleboro.

I digress.

Grafton is currently being torn by controversy about a proposed wind farm that a foreign corporation is proposing to build in the area. The voters will decide whether the project will go forward on election day in November.

The company recently sweetened the deal it was offering. It has offered yearly payments to every registered voter in the affected communities. One letter writer estimates he would realize $23,240 over the life of the deal.

The Attorney General’s office has ruled that the offer doesn’t violate applicable state law, which reads as follows:

A person who attempts by bribery, threats or any undue influence to dictate, control or alter the vote of a freeman about to be given at a general election shall be fined not more than $200.00.

Of course, I don’t practice in Vermont, and I’m not an expert in election law, but I respectfully disagree. I should add that as a property owner I don’t have a vote, nor do I actually have an opinion, as I can see both sides of the wind farm issue. Anyway, although Chester is close to the action, it’s not close enough, and it’s residents have no say in the matter.

But, back to the legal point, I think where they go wrong is offering the payments to each registered voter, rather than to each resident. If the point is to make the community a “partner”, as the company suggests, then every resident, regardless of whether he or she is a registered voter, should get a cut. By offering the cash to registered voters, they are clearly singling out the very people who will decide the fate of their project for bribes partnership payments, while leaving similarly affected people with nothing. Plus, there’s really no question but that the whole point of the bribes proposed payments is to sway people’s votes, particularly as the offer was made just a few weeks before what is clearly looking like a very close vote. There’s no question that the offer never would have been made if a favorable outcome were certain, so can there really be any question but that the payment is being offered to “alter the vote” of the voters?

Is there a way to resign?

As a white male, I find it rather disheartening that I am a member of the only demographic that supports Donald Trump, unless you count white people generally, but that’s a bit unfair to white women. You have to wonder, is there something in the DNA of white males that makes them particularly susceptible to small handed con-men? Why is my demographic the only one that can’t seem to see through the Donald, in particular, and in general, can’t seem to vote in its own interest? I mean, to paraphrase a song by the great Louis Armstrong, “What did we do, to be so white and dumb?”.

So, I ask, is there a way to resign from a demographic? Can I make myself an honorary something else?

I guess I’ll just have to content myself with the knowledge that the genetic flaw that runs in the genes of most white men, does not run in mine. Cold comfort, for my wife has pointed out a disturbing pattern among members of my demographic as they pass farther and farther into geezerdom, as I am currently doing. We remember so well the lifelong local Democrats who became weirdly conservative as they passed into senescence.

Still, it doesn’t happen to everyone, and I’m sure I’m proof against it. My genes may be compromised, but my will is strong.

Hey! Wait! Is that Fox News playing on that television? You know, sometimes they make a lot of sense, especially that Bill O’Reilly. I think I’ll watch for a while.

Great piece of writing

I read about this book review on another blog, unfortunately, I’ve forgotten which one, so I can’t give proper credit. Anyway, as that blogger pointed out, It’s an amazing piece of work by Michiko Kakutani of the New York Times. The book under review is a new biography of Hitler. But the review is really a well cloaked attack on, and warning about, Donald Trump. The review is well worth reading. I bought the book, and it’s pretty good as well.

A bit of sympathy for Dave Collins?

I’ve written a number of posts about the New London Day’s columnist, Dave Collins. Dave, despite the cynical tone of so many of his columns, is, it turns out, a fairly naive guy. He decided that any Republican who refused to renounce Donald Trump was beyond the pale. I think he actually thought that the local Republicans would pass the test. So far, not a one of them has passed, though some have failed to turn in their little blue books.

Poor Dave has already had to read Heather Somers and John Scott out of the ranks of the respectable. That must have hurt, but nowhere near as much as the latest. Last week Republican State Senator Paul Formica failed the test. Dave may be working on his column as I write this, and I’m sure it’s breaking his heart.

Dave in particular, and the New London Day in general, has been deep deep deep in the tank for Formica ever since he declared for the Waterford-New London senate seat in 2014. Dave couldn’t disparage Formica’s opponent or distort her record enough. When she (Betsy Ritter) was appointed Commissioner on Aging after her loss, Dave railed against the appointment, even while conceding that she was qualified for the post. The Day itself ignored the fact that Formica was totally unaware of the contents of a very important ballot question (which would have allowed the legislature to liberalize our antiquated voting laws) and was, in fact, generally pretty much of a dunderhead. But then, he’s a Republican.

If there’s a single Republican candidate in the area who could risk passing the Trump test, it has to be Formica. He’s pretty popular, because he runs a seafood restaurant. Yes, you read that right.

It’s entirely possible that Formica doesn’t even recognize the danger Trump poses to the Republic, but if that’s the case, he’s far too dumb to be in the state Senate. Most likely he does, but feels that danger is worth risking if the alternative is his own electoral defeat, even though there’s not much chance of that.

Anyway, I almost feel sorry for Dave. But I don’t.

What’s in store for debate two

Although I might still be needing a clothespin when I cast my vote next month, I have to admit that I’m super impressed by the Clinton campaign, and the trap it laid for the Donald in the first debate.

It’s dollars to donuts that they have something completely different to bait him in the second debate, and my bet is that he’ll fall for it all over again.

One thing they have going for them is that he’s got so much sleazy stuff in his past (this morning’s Times notes that he took a very suspect one billion dollar loss in 1995) that neither he or his staff can possibly predict what they’ll pick and how they’ll present it. If anything, the town hall forum setting will make it even more difficult for him to respond in a way approaching rationality.

Who knows, I may even bring myself to watching it in real time, rather than waiting to watch the best snippets.

A very disturbed man

Just bewildering. A guy whose living in a glass house shouldn’t be throwing stones. And if his wife is living there with him he ought to think twice again. First, the serial adulterer threatens to attack Hillary for Bill’s adultery, implying that it’s the woman’s fault if the man strays, which he probably truly believes. Now he’s attacking Alicia Machado over a non-existent sex tape. This from the guy whose wife’s nude pictures are all over the internet.

Also, what does it say about the guy that he gets up at 3 in the morning to spew this stuff. This is a man who is seriously mentally ill.

Some good news

A few years ago an occasional reader complained that I was a bit of a curmudgeon (who, me?) and that I rarely talked up good news. So, once a week for about five weeks I religiously posted some good news. I’m not sure if the well ran completely dry, or I just returned to my natural ways, but it’s been a while since I clicked the good news category.

All this is by way of saying that there is good news today, and it has nothing to do with Donald Trump:

The federal agency that controls more than $1 trillion in Medicare and Medicaid funding has moved to prevent nursing homes from forcing claims of elder abuse, sexual harassment and even wrongful death into the private system of justice known as arbitration.

An agency within the Health and Human Services Department on Wednesday issued a rule that bars any nursing home that receives federal funding from requiring that its residents resolve any disputes in arbitration, instead of court.

via The New York Times

This really is good news, one more positive action of the Obama administration, as it prepares to leave town. If we had a Congress that had any interest at all in serving the American people, these clauses would be banned outright in any consumer contract. The corporate world, with the enthusiastic assistance of the entire Supreme Court, has been slowly building an alternate and rigged “justice” system, just for itself. It’s a shame that Obama can’t see that the TPP does precisely the same thing, which is the real reason why most informed opponents are against it. In any event, this is a very good thing.

There is a legal doctrine under which clauses like this can be invalidated by a court. A “contract of adhesion” is a contract imposed by a stronger party upon a weaker. It’s one sided in the sense that the weaker party has no opportunity to really negotiate terms and has no bargaining power. It’s hard to imagine a contract that fits this bill more than one for a nursing home. (If you’ve ever been involved in the transfer of a person from a hospital to a nursing home, you know what I mean.) A court can step in and invalidate outrageous terms, such as the arbitration clauses at issue here. However, courts rarely take that step, and there’s no reason why the burden should be on the victim to go through the time and expense involved in litigating the issue.

Obama really has done a lot of good things, much of it under the radar, during his last year in office. All the more reason to make sure it doesn’t all get reversed by the Orange Man.

Anyway, good news.