Skip to content

Another in an endless series of modest proposals

Wednesday, June 5, 2019

It appears that William Barr is about to be held in contempt of Congress, but, this being an era in which our judiciary is now overflowing with rightwing ideologues, it is highly likely that it will take years for court battles to enforce the citation to play out, by which time he will either be out of office, or we will have comfortably settled into a dictatorship with the trappings of a Republic, much like Rome in the days of Caesar. (See my most recent post).

It occurs to me that there is a way to get some form of immediate sanction imposed on Barr. Though it is unlikely to have much legal efficacy, i.e., it will not result in his being fined or jailed, it nonetheless would have some propaganda value.

I don’t know what state issued Barr’s law license, but assuming it’s one in which the legal profession still believes in the rule of law, his license to practice law could be revoked. It seems to this now retired lawyer that a refusal to honor a lawfully issued subpoena would be sufficient grounds for disbarment. The federal courts would, or should, have no say in the matter, though I wouldn’t put it past the current federal judiciary to come up with a “just this time and this will never apply to Democrats” ruling to try to block the disbarment.

Still, something to think about. Of course if he’s licensed in someplace like Alabama the bar would probably rather give him an award.

Filed in Corruption, Modest Proposals | | Comments (0)

Hail Donald!

Tuesday, June 4, 2019

This is something that has occurred to me on numerous occasions. It occurred to me again as I read about the toddler in chief making an idiot of himself in England.

It now appears more likely than not that future historians (history is written by the winners, after all) will give the genius credit for delivering the final blows that brought down the American republic and replaced it with a dictatorship or autocracy. He may well be our Julius Caesar. Certainly there were Romans (Sulla comes to mind) that helped pave the way, just as there were Republicans here, but it was Julius who delivered the final blow.

Ah, but what a falling off is there. We should truly be ashamed that a man as mediocre as the genius will take us down. Before he became a dictator, Julius was a successful general. Contrast that with the genius, who was a failed businessman. Julius was an accomplished writer, who wrote, all by himself, what is considered at least a minor classic. The genius has never even reada book. Julius was at least a man of substance. Our guy is a snake oil selling buffoon, and we are still letting him destroy our Republic.

One other thing. When Julius met his well deserved end, it was at the hands of the Senators of Rome, who were making a last ditch attempt to stave off the inevitable. The majority of our Senators have enabled our child emperor at every turn.

No doubt historians of the future, like Fox “journalists” of today, will find a way to make him out to be a great man, but they’ve got their work cut out for him. Shame on us for choosing such an idiot to bring about our downfall.

Filed in The Very Stable Genius | | Comments (0)

Mueller Time

Wednesday, May 29, 2019

This morning I got an email from my wife, who was at work, telling me about the upcoming Mueller appearance, and suggesting I watch it. My first reaction was negative, as I told her I was afraid he was going to cop out, by which I meant that he would simply repeat what we already knew and that he would be circumspect, etc. 

In the end, I did watch, and my basic reaction was that he didn’t say anything we didn’t already know. I wrote to my wife and told her it was a “dud”.

An hour or two later I pulled up my RSS reader, and lo and behold, I found that my point of view was not widely shared. Josh Marshal gave it a rather tepid reception, but apparently the mainstream media felt differently. Even the folks at Fox, according to the folks at Crooks & Liars, interpreted his comments as a implicit call for Trump’s impeachment. Somehow, the mere repetition of what we could already read in the report was a game changer. For instance, it is now news that he would have absolved Trump of any criminal liability if the evidence supported such a move, but it didn’t. That is more or less a direct quote from the report.

The Prince of Denmark once said, “there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so”. Mueller’s statement could have been dismissed in much the way Josh and I dismissed it, but apparently there are folks that thinkit makes a difference if you say something in front of a camera that you’ve already set down in black and white. They happen to be the people that matter, the talking heads that appear on our television screens and the people who write newspaper headlines. Maybe Mueller was smart enough to see that was the case. In any event, it appears that his little speech will push the country further toward supporting the idea of impeachment, thereby putting more pressure on Pelosi to commence impeachment proceedings. I believe that Pelosi is perfectly happy to be pressured. I personally don’t care if they ever actually impeach, but I do think they should be investigating relentlessly. Using the impeachment process makes it all the harder for the genius’s judicial enablers to prevent that investigation. Even Kavanaugh would have a hard time (not saying he won’t anyway) coming up with a reason why the constitutional power to impeach does not carry with it the constitutional right to gather evidence.

We’ll have to see what the future brings, but maybe Mueller’s humdrum little speech might have started something.

Filed in The Very Stable Genius | | Comments (1)

Who could have guessed that Biden would be uninspiring?

Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Let me start by saying that I would vote for anyone with a D after his or her name in the 2020 presidential race. I desperately want us to win. In future posts, I may not so preface, but it should always be assumed.

That being said, I tremble in fear at the thought of a Joe Biden presidency. Here, Atrios points out that Biden’s inability to attract crowds is a problem, either with the candidate himself or with his campaign staff.

His staff may be partly to blame, but I think it’s Biden. Perhaps there are people in this country who are actually enthusiastic about the prospects of a Biden presidency, but they are few and far between. He is up in the polls partly due to name recognition, and partly because people who don’t really think too deeply think he’s the guy to beat Trump. And the latter is partly because he’s been anointed by the same people who anointed Hillary, and they figure that when all is said and done, he’s what they’ll be getting. Can anyone even articulate what Biden would do as president, or what he would like to do, other than not be Trump? All the other candidates are not Trump too, but they also have (except for the Seth Moulton and Tim Ryan DINOs) policy objectives that they articulate. We need for people to come out and vote, and they will not be inspired to do so by Joe Biden.

As a candidate, he will be his own worst enemy At least Hillary grasped most of the realities of the political landscape in which she was operating. That is, she understood that Republicans would take no prisoners and give no quarter. Biden is delusional. It is inevitable that, if nominated, he will make a fool of himself time and again, and the press will do to him what it does to all Democratic candidates: concentrate fire on him while giving Trump a “Trump being Trump” pass (Remember Al Gore, the alleged liar, and John Kerry, the alleged flip-flopper, and Hillary’s emails?). They’ll do it to whoever gets the Democratic nomination, but they’ll have so much more to fire at with Biden. Or maybe I should say “fire with”, since he’ll be giving them the ammunition. If anyone with a reasonable shot at the nomination can depress Democratic leaning turnout, it’s Joe Biden.

I still believe, or want to believe, that he’ll fade, but the truth is that given the gigantic field out there, if he keeps his numbers in the high teens, and the good candidates split the informed vote, we could end up sleep walking toward a replay of that awful night in November, 2016. 

Filed in Presidential Politics | | Comments (2)

We could use this here

Saturday, May 25, 2019

The British Labour Party suffers from some of the same defects as its American cousin, the Democrats. There is a cadre of right wing alleged Labourites holding it back, and it is easily intimidated by right wing bullshit. But they’re not all like that. I saw this video on Crooks & Liars and I felt I had to pass it on. We could use some of this on this side of the puddle.

My only criticism is that he doesn’t know how to pronounce “shit”.

Filed in Uncategorized | | Comments (0)

Meanwhile, as always, under the radar…

Monday, May 20, 2019

One of the many unfortunate side effects of the blatant criminality emanating from the White House and Attorney General is the fact that the regular run of the mill corruption that is the hallmark of this administration goes largely unremarked. One of the most corrupt of our regulators is Ajit Pai, the FCC Chair. Today he okayedthe proposed T-Mobile acquisition of Sprint, which everyone with a living brain realizes will result in an increase in the already outrageous cost of mobile phone service.

Now Pai says, despite all the evidence, that this will be good for consumers because the merged company has promised to deploy a 5G network and has also agreed not to raise rates for three years. But…, as you might expect:

Industry watchers doubt whether Pai’s FCC would enforce conditions given the agency’s unwillingness to stand up to major carriers on a litany of subjects, ranging from the foot-dragging on implementing robocall tech, casual treatment of consumer location data, and repair delays in the wake of hurricanes in both Florida and Puerto Rico.

This may not rise to Scott Pruitt levels of corruption, at least not obviously, but rest assured that if and when we get our country back Pai will be handsomely rewarded for his fealty to his former employers. All of the carriers benefit from this decision, because it will green light rate increases across the board, as the linked article discusses. Every carrier knows and Pai knows that he won’t enforce the conditions on the merged company so none of the other companies will be under competitive pressure to provide US consumers with a phone network on a par with that in other countries.

Indeed, that’s the way it works in this country and everyone knows it. Corporations say what they need to say to get the governmental action they want and then simply don’t do what they promised, especially now when they know that each and every regulatory body will look the other way.

Consider what Amazon is now trying to do to the town of Braintree, Massachusetts, where Amazon recently sued the Town over a requirement that “ delivery vehicles going to and from a warehouse that Amazon plans to build must carry signs identifying them as such.” It was a condition the Town Planning Board imposed on approving the facility in the first place in order to assure compliance with a traffic management plan to which Amazon agreed in order to get the zoning approval. At that time Amazon’s attorney said the requirement “makes sense”. The town relied upon that to grant the zoning approval in the first place. Had the attorney opposed the requirement, Amazon would likely not have gotten the approval. Now Amazon is suing to overturn that requirement, given that it has the approval safely in hand. If it were a federal regulatory issue, at this point in time, Amazon would not even bother to sue; it would simply ignore the requirement secure in the well founded belief that nothing would come of it. 

Filed in Corruption | | Comments (0)

Joe Biden was in a coma for eight years

Wednesday, May 15, 2019

If there were a god I would be imploring him/her to save us from this man:

In New Hampshire, Joe Biden predicts that once President Trump is out of office, Republicans will have “an epiphany” and work with Democrats toward consensus.

— Sahil Kapur (@sahilkapur) May 14, 2019

The Republicans thrive in the minority, but only if they oppose everything. Look at the poor NRA, which is losing money because they can’t claim their guns are threatened. But I am adding evidence to a case already made. Where was Biden when McConnell said his only objective at the start of Obama’s presidency was to assure that he was a one term president. Where was he when the Republicans refused the offered chance to destroy social security solely because they didn’t want to work on anything with Obama, even on an objective they’ve cherished for over 60 years. Where was he during the Merrick Garland debacle? The coma theory is the only one that gives the man the benefit of the doubt.

I’ll vote for him if I have to, but he’s a sure ticket, should he win (and I don’t think he will), to a Republican sweep in 2024.

Oh well, maybe I’ll be dead by then.

Filed in Presidential Politics | | Comments (0)

No one could have predicted this!

Monday, May 13, 2019

Boy, this is a shocker. No one could have predicted it:

A source close to the Florida man who raised over $22 million on GoFundMe in the “We The People Will Build the Wall” campaign just revealed today that the money has been diverted to pay for a ‘million dollar’ yacht and high-flying lifestyle.

Well, maybe some people could have predicted it. I wonder if the genius of the very stable variety is getting a cut.

Filed in Grifters | | Comments (0)

Yet another Open Letter to the New London Day

Monday, May 13, 2019

I’m glad to see that the Day is maintaining its policy of balancing each liberal column it runs with one (or more) by a conservative. After all, it’s been a few weeks since you hired right wing nutcase Lee Elci. Failed and embittered ex-legislator John Scott’s column in this morning’s paper (can’t seem to bring myself to provide a link) venting his spleen against tolls is yet another example of this stellar policy in action.

It’s a great example of right wing punditry, since not a word of it makes sense. But that’s not really the point, which is to try to take political advantage of what is a common sense solution to a real world problem.

As the Day noted in its printed (I believe the on-line version has been heavily edited) editorial endorsing tolls, it would be unrealistic to expect Republicans to endorse this common sense way of funding road maintenance, because doing the right thing is not their thing. Their thing is playing politics. With tolls, as with so much else, the game is played like this: Democrats are obligated to come up with solutions to problems. Republicans are in charge of creating more problems. (See, e.g., a certain very stable genius) Congratulations to the Day for enabling the very behavior it predicted in its editorial.

Scott swings for the fences and gets it over every time. The column is chock full of the “s” word, the go to insult from the right now that the “c” word is out of fashion. Like the “c” word, the “s” word has been drained of all content by the right, but it appears to be suffering a different fate than the “c” word. A substantial number of people appear to be concluding that if Republicans don’t like socialism, it must be a good thing.

He also hits the ball over the fence when he writes that everyone with a GPS will hit the back roads to avoid paying a couple of dollars in tolls. Only a right winger with a less than logical mind (all right winger minds are like that) could take that argument seriously. I guess it never occurred to John that such a dodge only works if you’re the only one dodging. As I pointed out in my own letter to the Day (gee, maybe I should get a column), I go to Maine every year (and other places with tolls). I never dodge them. Maybe it’s just me, but I’ll gladly pay a few bucks to cut the time it takes me to get to my ultimate destination. Just a suspicion, but I suspect it’s not just me. Oh, and that’s why you commission studies that Republicans vent about: to anticipate and minimize exactly those kinds of effects.

Anyway, back to my main point. Congratulations to the Day for enabling yet another Republican taking political advantage of Democratic willingness to do the right thing. Far be it from me to accuse you of knuckling under to the right wing nutcases that flood your letters page and troll your comment sections.

By the way, I’ve been having trouble finding the liberal columnists to whom I referred in my opening paragraph. I’ve looked and looked. You have a sports columnist who seems to have a sense of fair play and decency. Is that where I should be looking?

Filed in Local issues | | Comments (1)

An open letter to the New London Day

Friday, May 10, 2019

The Day has, for reasons the rational among us cannot fathom, repeatedly endorsed Heather Somers for any political office for which she happens to hanker. Curiously, however, the Day never bothers to cover what Ms. Somers happens to do in the course of her official duties.

Wait, let me correct myself. The Day slavishly passes on her self promoting press releases, but that’s not quite the same as actually committing journalism in the classic sense that some of us believe the Founders had in mind when they passed the First Amendment.

Here’s a recent case in point, about which the Day’s readers have heard nothing. The Connecticut constitution contains some absurd restrictions that prevent the legislature from allowing early voting except in limited cases. Recently a majority of the Connecticut Senate passed a bill that would begin the process of amending the constitution to correct this flaw. As it requires a super majority to get on the ballot it failed, because every Republican, including Heather Somers, voted against it.

Why is Heather against making it easier for people to exercise their right to vote? Well, according to Heather, you shouldn’t hand people their voting rights on a silver platter. To which a person who believes in democracy might say: why shouldn’t the state hand people their rights on a silver platter. Some might say that the state should make it its business to encourage everyone to vote, and that making voting easy and convenient is a fundamental obligation of any state that calls itself a democracy. Heather doesn’t see it that way. She appears to believe voters must prove themselves worthy to exercise their right to vote by overcoming every obstacle that good Republicans like Heather can place in their way. The Day reprinted a Connecticut Mirror article about the issue, but did not mention Heather or any other local opponent of the bill, nor did it do any independent journalism on this vital issue.

Perhaps the Day should ask Heather why it is a good thing to make people struggle to cast their vote. Perhaps the Day should let Heather’s constituents know that it is her opinion that it is a good thing to make it hard for people to cast a vote. Perhaps the Day should consider reporting on what Heather actually does, rather than reporting on the drivel that comes out of both sides of her mouth.

Just a thought, of course. I realize it’s contrary to the Day’s editorial philosophy to hold Republicans to the same standards as Democrats.

Filed in Local issues, Media | | Comments (0)