Skip to content

Common Ground

Yet another question has been raised about Sarah Palin. It seems that she was a member of an Alaska splinter party that advocated secession. The “don’t call [themselves] Americans, [the] are Alaskans”. More than likely they’re tired of living off the dole on funds sent North from the lower 48. It is not unprecedented for candidates for President or Vice-President to advocate disunion, though the last time it happened the candidates in question were seeking to run the Confederate States of America. The motto of the Alaskan Independence Party is “Alaska First”, and Palin’s campaign slogan during her gubernatorial run was, you guessed it, “Alaska First”. There’s reason to believe that she’s still of that mindset. And who knows, maybe when she joined the Republicans she was just following the dictates of the party, which advocates “infiltrating” the major parties in order to advance the secessionist cause.

McCain’s slogan was, until recently, “Country First”, but that has apparently been shitcanned, along with all that talk about experience.

We have been bombarded with fact free assertions that Obama is at worst a secret terrorist, at best a politician who puts his own interests above his country. At all events he hates his country, we have been asked to believe. Yet Palin is a politician who belonged to a party advocating secession. Will the patriot police get on the case of an avowed secessionist? We all know the answer.

But who am I to complain? Finally, something I can sort of agree with Palin about. No, I am not in favor of Alaskan secession. I’m an agnostic on the issue. However, for years I have, only half in jest, advocated New England secession, which I actually consider more a case of the real America kicking out the folks who’ve ruined the country we New Englanders brought into being. I have elaborated on my views in prior posts, at my old blog address. I’m pretty sure were I to run for President as a Democrat those old posts would disqualify me from office. I guess I’d have to run as a Republican.

That’s not vetting you can believe in!

Sarah Palin is a disaster for the country. It remains to be seen whether she is a disaster for John McCain. What does not remain to be seen is whether John McCain is competent to be president. We now have proof positive that he is not. He apparently chose someone to be vice-president, and possibly the next president, about whom he knew next to nothing. From Josh Marshall:

Earlier I noted Andrea Mitchell’s reference to reports that the McCain camp had just sent a team of GOP lawyers up to Alaska to do what I guess you’d call a post-vetting of Sarah Palin. Now George Stephanopoulos appears to have more. George says the McCainers are sending a “rapid response team of about ten operatives that includes lawyers” to do the aforementioned deeper vet. A lot of attention is being given to Gov. Palin’s daughter’s situation. The much bigger deal is the expanding trooper-gate investigation, the fact that Palin lied in her Friday speech about her purported opposition to the Bridge to Nowhere, her apparent former membership in the secessionist Alaska Independence Party, and more. Individually, you can come to your own judgment about how consequential these stories are. What they show pretty clearly now — in addition to the news that the McCain campaign is only now sending in a vetting team — is that John McCain didn’t do any serious vetting of Palin before he invited her to join his ticket and, he hopes, become Vice President of the United States.

Whether he fell for a pretty face (it wouldn’t be the first time he let his wiener do his thinking) or he just decided to “gamble” with the future of the Republic, this is proof positive that the man who trumpets his own experience has learned nothing in a long career in politics.

Here’s more on Palin by the way, who-also by the way- retained a lawyer today to fend off impeachment in Alaska. She appears to be an executive in the grand tradition of George Bush. The first thing she did when she became Mayor of her Alaska Mayberry was to fire everybody, for no reason at all:

If a small-town mayor ever ruled with an iron fist — it was Palin. Eleven days after taking office in 1996, she mailed letters to each of the city’s top managers requesting that they resign as a test of loyalty.

The Anchorage Daily News at the time reported the strange events: (via Nexis)

Mayor Sarah Palin sent the resignation requests Thursday to Police Chief Irl Stambaugh, public works director Jack Felton, finance director Duane Dvorak and Mary Ellen Emmons, the head of libraries. A fifth director — John Cooper, who oversaw the city museum — resigned earlier this month after Palin eliminated his position.

Cooper initially resisted resigning, but to no avail. Palin also later fired the police chief, saying she knew in her “heart” that he did not support her. She left the head of libraries a letter saying she was out — though Palin later decided to spare the librarian after being convinced that she would tow the line.

The whole saga is unusual — considering Palin prides herself on being independent and seems to enjoy butting heads with her own party. But, this sounds like she requires fierce loyalty of those who work for her.

A despot, true to the Republican traditions. No doubt she replaced them with cronies who were sure to do a heckuva job.

There’s already speculation that she will share the same fate as Eagleton (e.g., here and here), a fate she more richly deserves than that decent man. There is a brief window for that to happen, in my opinion. McCain has mortgaged his candidacy to this lady. He can’t be perceived as having forced her out, because he would outrage the women who support her for that reason (a microscopically small number of people, most likely, but probably existing in statistically relevant numbers) and, more importantly, his evangelical base which doesn’t care what an incompetent nut-case she is. In addition, it would be an admission of incompetence on his own part. McGovern could not have been expected to know about Eagleton’s past. All McCain had to do was get someone to Google her, and he could have found almost everything that has come out so far. In fact, all he had to do was go to Josh’s website. He’s been writing about Palin’s problems long before she was chosen to run for vice-president.

If she’s to leave, it must be before Thursday, and it must be in a way that is perceived to be of her own choosing. I would suggest that she decide that really, maybe “I should spend time with the Down Syndrome Child that I chose to bring into the world, given the fact that such a child needs intensive care, and given the fact that I made a commitment to care for it when I decided to have it. For that reason”, she might go on, “I have decided that though I am flattered by being chosen, and I would love to go on with the campaign, I must put my family first, etc., gag, etc.” None of it would be true, of course, but it would be truthy enough to do the trick.

Finally, since we’re on all things Palin, watch this McCain spokesman weasel out of backing up the McCain claim that she has military and foreign policy experience by dint of being “commander in chief” of the Alaskan National Guard. The claim, by the way, is factually untrue as it relates to the National Guard’s activities on foreign soil.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYYiw_y2qDI[/youtube]

I may have to start a new category for this lady. I wouldn’t have thought a vice-presidential candidate would warrant it. I only regret that after eight years of Bush it is really hard to summon up the proper degree of outrage about this candidacy. It reaches heights of incompetence, arrogance, cynicism and recklessness without precedent prior to November, 2000. Unfortunately, it doesn’t come close to tying Bush/Cheney/Rove at their best.

Can’t resist

Again, thanks to a reader that tipped me off to the latest rumors about Sarah Palin. This is the best account I’ve seen, though it’s also covered at Buzzflash.

There are a number of things about the story that lend credence to the speculation, the picture at the linked article being one. Another is the fact that she allegedly broke her water in Texas and flew to Alaska to have the baby, rather than have it in Texas, like any normal person would do. She would have to be in Alaska during the time of the birth, of course, and it is possible she was notified while at the conference that her daughter was about to have the baby.

All of this is totally wild speculation at this point, but so much fun.

Update: I figured it was too good to be true.

McCain examines Sarah’s qualifications

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RN5xbWtNSU[/youtube]

Sunday Morning Sermon

Via Pharyngula:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnjfxCp92pc[/youtube]

Market forces

Recently I was having a conversation with a friend. Actually, it wasn’t a conversation, it was more like we were taking turns ranting. It will come as no surprise that we were talking politics.

During the course of the conversation one of us mentioned the Republican mantra that the market will take care of all our problems, from health care to food safety to global warming. I ranted something to the effect that if the market could truly take care of all of these problems, then they wouldn’t exist and we wouldn’t be talking about them.

As soon as I said it, I realized that I had made a point that is at once both trivial and somewhat profound. It’s trivial, because a second’s thought is all you need to realize it’s a self evident statement. It’s somewhat profound merely because it’s a point that no one ever seems to make, at least not framed like that.

Why, after all these years, has the magic market not yet fixed our health care system? Why do we still get tainted foods whenever the FDA is in the hands of Republicans? How did global warming ever get to be a problem if the market cures all? Doesn’t the very existence of these chronic problems prove the inefficacy of markets alone to cure them?

The Republican belief in markets is of a piece with religious faith, but it has the dubious distinction of being even less justifiable. By its nature, religious faith is irrefutable, because it is untestable. The Republican faith in markets is being tested every day, and every day it is proven to be wrong. Food safety is a great example, since the FDA was created as a result of a free market system that was poisoning us, and the last eight years have proven that any regulatory easing quickly results in more poisoning.

So, whereas the religious continue to believe despite the lack of evidence, Republicans continue to believe despite the overwhelming evidence. The religious win that battle-their faith is more intellectually defensible.

Now, I suppose one might argue that the market would assure food safety in time, or that it could solve the health care crisis in time, or that it could put an end to global warming in time, but we must then ask that the operative time scale be defined. If history is any guide, the time scale is of geological dimensions and the success will be achieved only after the markets have destroyed the earth’s ability to sustain life, in which case, I suppose, the market will in fact have solved the problem, in its own way.

Alas, like any people of faith, Republicans have a way of disregarding dogma when it suits their purposes, or the purposes of their corporate masters. Predictably, they do it in situations where markets actually might help to solve a problem. Given such a state of affairs, they immediately game the market to prevent such a shocking disturbance in the force. Consider this from this morning’s New York Times, again relating to food safety:

A federal appeals court has ruled that the government can prohibit meat packers from testing their animals for mad cow disease. Because the Agriculture Department tests only a small percentage of cows for the deadly disease, a Kansas meatpacker, Creekstone Farms Premium Beef, wanted to test all of its cows, but the government says it cannot. Larger meat companies worry that if Creekstone is allowed to perform the test and advertise its meat as safe, they could be forced to do the expensive test, too. The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said restricting the test was allowable.

Here we see how market forces might actually contribute a mite to promoting food safety, so obviously it was necessary to put an end to Creekstone’s marketing gimmick. I should add that the likelihood is that it would not have helped all that much. Creekstone’s meat was to be aimed at the premium market, and was unlikely to have had much of a real impact on the behavior of the large meatpacking corporations. However, better be safe than sorry and Creekstone’s attempt to compete by promoting food safety was crushed.

Daily Show on Palin

Jon Stewart and Samantha Bee:

Abuse of power in Alaska

There is a report, of uncertain reliability, that the McCain camp is only now sending people to Alaska to look into the Sarah Palin Troopergate scandal. If true, it would be unsurprising, as it appears that less thought went into this decision than I made today choosing an ice cream flavor at Salem Valley Farms (great ice cream, by the way). Every move McCain makes reveals his own incompetence and unsuitability to be the president of the United States. It really is beginning to appear that being a prisoner of war really doesn’t automatically qualify one to be president. What a surprise.

I’m indebted to one of my readers for pointing me to this site, where a little more of the Palin story is told. The writer is a former political rival of Palin’s, so a grain of salt might be in order, but the article appears well sourced, and he even includes a PDF of the most damning evidence.

In a nutshell, the scandal involves pressure put on the commissioner of public safety to fire the governor’s brother-in-law, who was in the midst of a bitter divorce with Palin’s sister. The commissioner refused, and he was then himself fired.

Apparently, family matters a lot to Palin. Not only did she fire a man who was doing his job, in order to help her sister, but as is demonstrated at the link above, she has let her husband, Todd, become an unofficial state official. He attends meetings with the governor. And, when one of her formerly most trusted advisors started seeing the estranged wife of one of Todd’s friends, he arranged to have him fired.

Another, and more disturbing example:

The most alarming indication of Todd Palin’s reach into state government came just yesterday.

Last month, a group of Alaskans filed a freedom of information act for emails sent from the computers of both Frank Bailey and Ivey Frye. Along with several boxes of documents, they received a cover letter along with 78 pages detailing the emails that were not released due to “Deliberative Process and Executive Privilege”…

Page 1 of the list showed seven emails from both Governor Sarah Palin and Lt. Governor Sean Parnell within a three hour time frame on Feburary 1, 2008 that were described as “Email re Andrew Halcro”.

The serious concern about these emails is that they were prohibited from being released to the public due to executive privilege, even though Todd Palin was copied on these same emails.

Todd Palin is not a member of the executive branch, nor is he even a government employee. Todd Palin is a member of the general public.

So why in the world is Todd Palin getting copied on emails that his wife’s administration is classifying as confidential?

These emails should be released to the public…after all Todd Palin has no standing to claim executive privilege. By including him in the email loop, the Palin administration has arguably breached any claim of executive privilege.

After all, government can’t pick and choose what private citizens get to see confidential material, that is exactly why freedom of information laws exist.

I have omitted portions of the post that relate to what, at least at the moment, is inside baseball, Alaska style.

Besides being manifestly unfit to be president, it appears that Sarah Palin has little or no appreciation for the distinction between public and private. She and her husband use the power of her office as an instrument to wreak vengeance on those with whom they have private grievances. In short, she abuses her office. In that respect, she fits in well with the ethos of the Republicans presently in Washington.

Friday Night Music-Bob Dylan

Okay, I’ve always wanted to post these two songs. Bob Dylan again, but let’s face it, he deserves it.

Both of these songs are optimistic in their own way and, I hope, timely right now. The best my addled brain could come up with tonight to celebrate what may be the dawning of a new era.

The Times They Are A Changing:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ_XwLSN45I[/youtube]

This one’s a bit more obscure, but it’s one of my personal favorites. I was hoping to find the Chieftain’s version from the Dylan Tribute Concert, because I think their version is better than Dylan’s, but couldn’t find it. The Hour That The Ship Comes In

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vhNCRlXm1s[/youtube]

I’ve always thought the Democrats could make use of music like this at their conventions, instead of the dreck and pablum (Stevie Wonder excepted) to which they subject the country every four years. There’s tons of music that could reinforce the Democratic message, and maybe keep the network talking heads quiet between speeches, assuming you could get big enough names to perform.

Obama’s speech

For the record, I thought it was excellent. You can quibble about points he failed to make, or that he might have emphasized more, but he made his case and he put McCain in his place nicely.

I don’t have the video skills, and didn’t tape the speech in any event, but I have a feeling that one could make an effective pro-Obama video by doing a split screen contrast between Obama’s speech and whatever piece of crap McCain delivers in the Twin Cities.