Skip to content

Staples out-Bysiewicz up in the air

Cam Staples has dropped out of the AG race, leaving only George Jepsen and Susan Bysiewicz standing. Unfortunately, for Susan, we also learned today that the Republicans have appealed the trial court’s decision finding her eligible to run for the office, so you might say she is only half standing.

The appeal shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone. It’s the logical thing for them to have done. The Connecticut Supreme Court (which I assume will take the case, which might on the first instance have to be filed with the Appellate Court) can expedite the process, but I don’t think they can speed it up fast enough for a decision prior to the convention. That leaves the delegates with a practical problem.

Putting aside ones views on who would make the best Attorney General, you have to consider the fact that there is some legitimate uncertainty about whether Susan is even eligible for the job. Court’s are reluctant to step in on questions of this sort, at least they have been historically, for reasons that are somewhat understandable. On the other hand it is the job of the courts, like it or not, to enforce the law, and it just may be that the court may find Susan’s active practice to have been a tad too inactive.

My bet is that she’ll win, and that it will be decided prior to the primary. The Republicans are apparently banking on the tapes or transcripts of her depositions to do her in, assuming she wins the primary. I don’t buy into that, for the simple reason that very few people will be paying attention to the AG race, and the heavy spending on the Senatorial race (I’ve been saying for months that McMahon will get it, and that now looks like a sure thing) and on the gubernatorial race, will suck the air right out of the other constitutional races. Let’s not forget those races don’t have much air even in those years when billionaires and millionaires aren’t spending money like water. Susan would have to say something a lot more damaging than an admission that she has only been to small claims court to get much attention one way or the other. That’s the way she should want it, of course. The less attention paid to the race, the more name recognition counts, and she has that in spades.

By the way, I’ve spent a lot more time in court than Susan, but I would be the last to say you need courtroom experience to be an attorney general. It’s more important that you understand the legal issues that come before you and are able to get the people working for you to advocate effectively.

All that being said, I’m leaning Jepsen.

Smart move

Well, apparently Dan Malloy has chosen Nancy Wyman as his lieutenant governor, which may certainly help to solidify his support this side of the river. Everyone likes Nancy. This could set up an interesting situation, as when the primary comes, unless I’ve been misinformed, we vote for the two offices separately. So, we Lamont supporters, if we so desire, can stick with Ned and cast a vote for Nancy in August.


A bit closer to home

Well, it’s not like New York City has made it official, nor, hopefully, has Apple, but it seems like there may be a bit of racial profiling going on at the SoHo Apple Store, complete with demands for “your papers”, all in the obviously worthy cause of keeping Ipads out of China until Apple wants them there. Odd, since that’s where they are all made.

Apple’s retail store in New York City’s SoHo neighborhood is being accused of discrimination against Chinese customers resulting from an effort to reduce the number of iPads being purchased for export. Grace Meng, a representative of Queens in the New York State Assembly, has emailed Apple after receiving a number of complaints from customers claiming that Apple employees denied them iPads, demanded to see passports, or otherwise acted inappropriately. “One person was asked why they wanted one since their English was not so good,” Meng told the Daily News. “I want to get an explanation.” In one example, a Queens man was initially told that the store was out of iPads, and was only able to secure one after seeking out an Asian employee.

I love Apple’s products, but their obsession with secrecy and control is getting a bit creepy. This may have been overzealous lower-downs, but they are just taking their cue from the corporate culture.


Peckinpaugh

It looks like the Second District Republicans may give their nomination for the Second District Congressional seat to Janet Peckinpaugh, who was, until recently, an Independent:

Peckinpaugh’s recent switch to the Republican Party shows that “she’s clearly an independent-minded person,” [NRCC spokesman Greg] Blair said. “It sounds like that makes her an interesting fit for the district.”

Well, that’s putting the best face on the Republican situation in the Second CD. There are already three actual Republicans in the race, but none of them reaches the level of mediocre. It bespeaks the bankruptcy of the party in these parts that it jumps at the chance to name a person of unknown but flexible principles in place of anyone it can find in its own ranks. If she is nominated, Peckinpaugh would be the second woman running as a Republican for federal office in this state who would be using the Republican Party as a vehicle to satisfy her personal vanity.


For Blumenthal’s consideration

Carly Fiorina’s demon sheep ad has become infamous. This ad, produced by a group called Crazy Wolf Films, is a brilliant follow up.

We can only hope that Blumenthal can find some folks capable of doing the same to Linda McMahon, because you can be sure that, once she has the Republican nomination in hand, she will roll out the attack machine against him. It’s going to be his job to introduce the real McMahon to Connecticut voters, because it’s unlikely the press will do that job.


A surprising fact

Tomorrow is Mother’s Day, and as all the world knows, motherhood, along with baseball and apple pie, is a peculiarly American value. For reasons that are unclear, the rest of the world is apparently hostile to motherhood, particularly, as it turns out, the Italians, who are producing fewer mothers than any other country on earth, despite the urgings of the Pope. (Perhaps it’s not a very good idea to talk about the Pope’s urges, so I’ll let that go). But I digress, as it is not my objective to attempt to understand why we in America have this unique regard for motherhood. Rather I write to take notice of the fact that this regard for motherhood appears to be universal in our culture, bridging the gap that divides us on so many fronts-the gap that divides us on the left and, for that matter, in the middle, from those on the right that we are constantly assured have a monopoly on “values”.

Now, given the fact that we left-wingers clearly do not have “values”, it should be safe to assume that we would reject motherhood, that unique American value, along with all the other American values that we scorn, such as torture, corporate rapacity, scientific illiteracy, Biblical fundamentalism, racism, and conviction without trial, to mention just a few. Surprisingly, this is not so.

The fact is, that many of us on the left have an astonishingly relaxed, even supportive, attitude toward motherhood. Take me for example. Like many of my other lefty friends, I have a mother, toward whom I harbor generally good feelings, particularly in her role qua mother. My wife, although not a mother when I met her, became a mother during the course of our marriage, and I not only tolerated, but approved of her change of status, which she, a confirmed lefty herself, assumed with few qualms. These are facts. My children, godless secular humanists both, share my own attitude toward mothers.

But it’s not just relatively obscure lefties that approve of motherhood. Some extremely well known leftists have joined in what many might assume would be left wing heresy. Teddy Kennedy loved his mother. It is rumored that Barack Obama (an honorary leftist, for purposes of this post) had a mother, though it is not known precisely where she achieved that status, as it appears that Obama was born in Kenya while his mother was in Hawaii. This makes her an extraordinary mother indeed. The fact is, it is hard to find a person of the leftwing persuasion that is hostile toward motherhood.

It is difficult to account for this singular fact, but it is nonetheless a fact. Despite our embrace of anti-American values such as equality, universal health care, religious tolerance, the rule of reason, and due process, we still, incomprehensibly, love our own mothers specifically, and have warm and fuzzy feelings toward the idea of motherhood generally. It is a profound and truly unfathomable situation, which would surely be the subject of much debate, were the fact more widely known.

Now, as to apple pie and baseball-well, that’s another story.

Postscript: I actually wrote this post before I assured myself that, indeed, we liberals are presumed to hate motherhood. A little googling was enough to establish that I had not underestimated our right wing friends. Consider, e.g., Another Motherhood-Hating, Traditional Gender Role-Attacking, San Fran Liberal or Phyllis Shlafley’s Feminists Consider Motherhood Oppressive. It’s actually sort of nice to know that you can always count on the right. It’s almost reassuring.


Friday Night Music-Something Completely Different

When I got my first CD player, sometime around 1986, I started to branch out a bit, musically speaking. Partly that was because, at first, there was more classical music on CD, and partly because I wanted to learn about classical music. I also started listening to a lot of pre-rock stuff. I quickly got hooked on all things George Gershwin-in my opinion the greatest American songwriter/composer of the 20th century, who was lucky enough to have a brother who was among the greatest lyricists.

Rhapsody in Blue was one of the first Gershwin compositions I picked up. Is it classical, or jazz? Whatever it is, it’s great, and far and away more of a joy to listen to than any other classical piece (if that’s what it is) composed in the last 100 years. This video is a movie by one Adrian Marthaler, made in 1981. Seems to me he catches the mood pretty well. The piece is about 16 minutes long, longer than youtube allows, so it’s in two segments. A big investment of your time, but give it a shot if you’ve never heard it. It’s truly wonderful music.

That being the meal, assuming you’ve got this far, here’s some Gershwin dessert. Ella Fitzgerald singing Summertime

and the man himself performing I’ve Got Rhythm

Tomorrow, back to blogging. Depending on your point of view, that’s either a promise or a threat.


No Ice Cream this time

Gerry Garcia dropped by at last night’s Drinking Liberally, no doubt the last politician of note (not counting founding and faithful member Betsy Ritter) we will see until the next election cycle.

Gerry is an impressive guy. We Democrats have the bad or good fortune, depending on how you look at it, of having an embarrassment of riches as far as the people running for secretary of state (or is is secretary of the state) are concerned. Come to think of it, that’s the case for all the offices. Why are the Republican candidates all such mediocrities, I wonder?

When Gerry came to our town committee meeting a few weeks ago he passed out ice cream, Ben and Jerry’s of course, but, alas, could not do so last night.

I should say here that there was a bit of confusion about last night, as word was circulated that Dan Malloy was going to come as well. In fact, Dan never committed to come, or even, so far as I know, said he would come, so that was an error, though of course he would have been welcome.

This has been a truly busy week for me. I do hope to actually get to serious posting at some point, but this is the best I can do for now.


Ned comes to Groton

As advertised yesterday, Ned Lamont and Mary Glassman came to visit the local convention delegates here in Groton tonight.

For what it’s worth, I think Ned is leading among us Grotonites.


Corporations can speak freely, and quash speech too

This sort of thing is all too familiar:

VoteVets, a progressive organization founded by veterans of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, unveiled a strong television ad last week, connecting a climate bill to the nation’s national security interests. The spot notes that “a clean energy climate plan would cut our dependence on foreign oil in half and cut oil profits for hostile nations.” Sounds right to me.

The ad has already aired on CNN and MSNBC, but not on Fox News. It’s not because the group didn’t try; it’s because the network refused the commercial. A spokesperson for VoteVets said Fox News rejected the ad as “too confusing.”

The sad truth is that it is progressive messages that are most likely to be banned, for reasons that should be mystifying, but are actually quite clear. When they don’t run counter to the narrative of overtly political networks like Fox, the run counter to the narrative of the corporations that control the supposedly non-political networks. And then, sometimes, their just too controversial, like the spot referenced in the linked article in which the United Church of Christ propounded the un-Christian message that it welcomed all comers.

They are our airwaves or, in the case of cable systems, regulated monopolies or quasi-monopolies. They are analogous to public accommodations, and Congress should step in and forbid these corporations from refusing to air political messages based on content, unless that content is obscene. To ease feigned concerns, Congress could at the same time relieve the networks from any liability for libel or slander arising from the content of the ads. This will never happen of course; Republicans like the current system too much; and Democrats are too spineless and too addicted to the crumbs they get from the corporate table to do something so clearly in their theoretical interest.

Still, one can dream. After all, we on the left are already bombarded with messages with which we disagree. It could only get better for us.