Skip to content

I’m not writing about Hillary

I am not a good enough writer to express the outrage I feel as Hillary Clinton attempts to insure a McCain victory in the fall. The Democrats are notoriously undisciplined, but no one has undermined a competitor in this fashion since Humphrey did a similar sort of number on McGovern in 1972. McGovern probably would have lost anyway, but it didn’t help that Humphrey painted him as a wild eyed radical who couldn’t be trusted to be president. What Hillary is doing is ever worse, because if Obama loses it will be in much greater part because of the groundwork laid by Hillary. Should she get the nomination, she is also guaranteeing her own defeat, because she is throwing away the support of committed Democrats, liberals, young people and blacks. All she’ll have left is embittered gun toting Bible readers, who will vote for McCain anyway.

So, since I’m not going to write about Hillary, I’ll content myself with explaining my absence yesterday. My wife and I went to Brooklyn to see my son, who is living there while he’s attending graduate school at NYU. We were happily surprised that our older son came up from Washington to join us. We went to the Brooklyn Botanic Gardens and the Brooklyn Museum of Art, both in sort of whirlwind fashion because of the time constraints we were under. A picture from the Gardens below. Anyone interested can see a lot more at the “Brooklyn” page, link on the upper right or you can click here.

brooklyn-2008-04-1213-22-42-2008-04-12-at-13-22-42.jpg

Sullivan trashes Simmons (implicitly in any event)

wtfdnucsailor (who I assume is from Waterford) reports at Connecticut Local Politics that my friend Sean Sullivan has attacked Joe Courtney, who has been in Congress a little over a year, because we are not currently building two subs a year in Groton. As the sailor from Waterford points out:

I am not sure what Candidate Sullivan is referring to. Unfortunately, you cannot start building two submarines a year immediately, even if you wanted to. Congressman Courtney successfully got $588 million in the current budget that included lead time funds for a second submarine starting in 2011, vice the 2012 proposed by the Navy

The blame, if any there is, for the fact that we are not presently building two submarines a year rests with Rob Simmons, who was in Congress during the years the planning for those subs should have taken place.

I express no opinions about whether we should be building any subs, primarily because my identity is known, and speaking ill of the sub-building business is a capital offense here in Groton.

Friday Night Music-REM

I’m too impressionable. These guys were on Colbert last week, so I figured next chance I got, I’d put them up.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_XFMCgeI7c&feature=related[/youtube]

What we’re up against, part 2 of …

This is the most absurd anti-Democrat spin I’ve heard of to date:

Now they’re making up weird new rules as they go along. Here’s the money quote from the video:

And it’s just one of those sort of weird things. You know, when the owner of the diner says, “Here, have some coffee,” you say, “Yes, thank you,” and, “Oh, can I also please have some orange juice, in addition to this?” You don’t just say, “No, I’ll take orange juice,” and then turn away and start shaking hands.

Who knew? Most likely, Chris Matthews didn’t know about that rule until it came out of his mouth.

This is all part of one media narrative. Obama is an elitist who can’t bowl and doesn’t know how to eat at a diner. He’s not like “us” media folks who understand Joe Lunchpail. (Pay no attention to our million dollar paychecks and summer homes in Nantucket.) It’s not just Chris Matthews, though he’s the leader of the pack on this meme. Gail Collins, at the New York Times, finds Obama “disturbingly Ivy League“. This “posh Ivy League elitist not man of the people” narrative, by the way, coexists comfortably with the Obama as radical America hater narrative. Do they contradict themselves? Very well, they contradict themselves.

Good eating at my alma mater

The New York Times published two articles recently about the quality of the cuisine at my Alma Mater, Bowdoin College in Bruswick, ME. We alums have always known that Bowdoin was the best school in the country, but it has not always had the best food. Now it is at the top of both heaps.

You can read about the culinary delights to be had at the school here and here.

Justin Foster, a freshman from Memphis, was surprised at the variety and the quality he found at Bowdoin. “White spinach lasagna, eggplant parm, ratatouille, Honolulu tofu with rice and peppers, sweet potato fries,” he reeled off his favorite dishes, “and they make a really good rum cake, too. Vegans, vegetarians — the cooks make it easy for those students with that lifestyle, and I appreciate the food more, knowing they’re making a real effort to be green, to use organic food, to be environmentally friendly.”

[Dining Director Mary Lou] Kennedy said: “First, our cooks know how to cook. All of our soups are from scratch. We have Fair Trade coffee locally roasted. We have our own butcher who grinds the meat for our hamburgers, and 20 percent of our food budget is locally sourced.”

Bowdoin has two organic gardens, begun five years ago as a student project and now in the hands of a farm manager. Last year they supplied more than $20,000 of herbs and vegetables, with the surplus sold at an on-campus farmers’ market.

Both articles point out that the yearly bill to parents for this food is a number approximately equal to the entire cost of a Bowdoin education (tuition, room and board) in the prehistoric period when I attended the school. In any event, I am not jealous, nor do I begrudge my academic descendants their gourmet meals. In my day, the food built character, particularly at my financially strapped fraternity (it folded while I was there), where the cook developed a tuna fish sandwich featuring pourable tuna, made possible by the proportion of mayo to tuna in the recipe. The menu also featured such delicacies as Shepherd’s Pie (a great way to recycle) and an oft served meat identified as lamb, something no one was ever able to verify. Yes, the food built character. These kids have it far too easy:

The Web site www.collegeprowler.com, which has more than 180,000 visitors a month and publishes college guides, just named Bowdoin “School of the Year.”

“After the warm atmosphere and amazing faculty, students cited the food as their favorite thing about the college,” the site’s co-founder, Luke Skurman, said in an interview. “After I visited, I understood why.

“The dining halls post the students’ comment cards. One read, ‘Would it be possible for you to make pumpkin chocolate muffins?’ Underneath, the reply was, ‘Please expect to see them every Monday morning.’ ”

Is that any way to prepare these kids for the cold, hard world they are about to enter? They’ll expect a life full of pumpkin chocolate muffins, when they’re more likely to get pourable tuna.

Garry Wills on Lincoln and Obama

Garry Wills is one of my favorite writers. In the most recent New York Review of Books he makes the case that the best comparison to Obama’s recent speech on race is to Lincoln’s Cooper Union Speech, not to JFK’s speech on religion or FDR’s First Inaugural. Wills points out that both men faced similar challenges:

The most damaging charge against each was an alleged connection with unpatriotic and potentially violent radicals. Lincoln’s Republican Party was accused of supporting abolitionists like William Lloyd Garrison, who burned the Constitution, or John Brown, who took arms against United States troops, or those who rejected the Supreme Court because of its Dred Scott decision. Obama was suspected of Muslim associations and of following the teachings of an inflammatory preacher who damned the United States. How to face such charges? Each decided to address them openly in a prominent national venue, well before their parties’ nominating conventions—Lincoln at the Cooper Union in New York, Obama at the Constitution Center in Philadelphia.

The article must be read in full. Wills makes the point that both men successfully distanced themselves, in principled fashion, from the excesses of those with whom they were, in many ways, in fundamental agreement. Wills is too good a writer, and the points he makes are too nuanced to lend themselves to easy synopsis, but his concluding paragraphs make his overall point well:

Lincoln faced a greater challenge— the threat of national disintegration— and he had to make commensurately greater concessions, like granting the South its claim to constitutional protection of slavery. The extremist in his attic, John Brown, had not only spoken wild words but taken up weapons and killed men. Lincoln was under strong pressures to trash Brown, but he knew this would serve no useful purpose.

In his prose, Obama of necessity lagged far behind the resplendent Lincoln. But what is of lasting interest is their similar strategy for meeting the charge of extremism. Both argued against the politics of fear. Neither denied the darker aspects of our history, yet they held out hope for what Lincoln called here the better “lights of current experience”—what he would later call the “better angels of our nature.” Each looked for larger patterns under the surface bitternesses of their day. Each forged a moral position that rose above the occasions for their speaking.

Wouldn’t it be nice to once again have a president who can cope with complexity, both internally and in the way s/he communicates with the American people. Obama took the chance of treating the American people like intelligent people who could transcend sloganeering. It actually appears to have worked, at least partly. Maybe there really is hope.

Jodi-out of the loop

Only Jodi Rell, rumored to be the most popular governor in the nation, could get away with criticizing herself. Two days ago, the Democrats complained that they’d been kept in the dark about the rising cost of a railroad maintenance facility in New Haven. This seems fair on their part. It was, after all, officials in Rell’s administration that hid the rising costs from the legislators.

Never to be outdone, or on the wrong side of an issue, the governor now claims that she too is outraged by the actions of her own administration. Apparently, no one in her administration bothered to tell her about the $250 million in extra costs. More than likely they figured there was no need to go any higher than Lisa Moody. What a luxury for Rell, she even gets to attack her own administration as if she’s a passive bystander to events.

Did I say “as if”? That’s unfair to Jodi. She in fact is a passive bystander so she has a perfect right to act the part.

New Moveon Video

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suNqiAgE1kw[/youtube]

Revising and expanding my remarks

Yesterday I mentioned that McCain might find it easier still to get away with the lies that he tells about Iraq if he could keep some basic stuff, like the difference between Shiite and Sunni straight. He put his ignorance on display when he confused Sunni and Shiite yet again in his questions to Bush’s puppet general.

But embedded it that exchange was a larger deception, one I am convinced is not the result of mere ignorance, but is part of a deliberate, if so far blessedly unsuccessful strategy, the object of which is to scare the American people into supporting this absurd war. McCain got the tame general to say that Al Qaeda in Iraq, be it Sunni or Shiite, was a major threat. He did not clarify what it threatened, but can we assume that it is allegedly a threat to our “goal” of a democratic Iraq.

McCain and his ilk have seized on this group for one reason and one reason only: the bogeyman effect. The group shares a name with Osama bin Laden’s group, so repeating that name is bound to ratchet up the twin emotions of fear and loathing. Never mind that it is a minor player in Iraq, never mind that it lacks support even among Sunnis. Ignore also the fact that its presence in Iraq has been vastly overstated or that it is probably the first group that will be crushed by whoever takes over after we leave.

It is sufficient for McCain that he can use the term “Al Qaeda”, implicitly reinforcing the discredited connection between Iraq and Osama bin Laden. Since this is McCain, his inability to separate Shiite from Sunni garners whatever negative media attention he might get. The fact that he, along with Petreaus, Bush and the usual cast of crazies (including St. Joe) are pumping up a fringe group, gets no media attention at all. The importance of Al Qaeda in Iraq is one of those articles of faith which cannot be questioned, like the oft repeated but untrue assertion that the world is better off without Saddam in Iraq. Constant repetition doesn’t make something true, but it can make it truthy, and that’s all that matters.

Michael Ware reacts to Petreaus testimony

Michael Ware tells the truth on television:

One must wonder why they can’t find guys with brains like that to put in front of the camera on a day to day basis, instead of brain dead people like Blitzer. Or does the comfortable life inside the Beltway cause brain death in formerly intelligent people?

Ware is right. Obama wasn’t bad, but the truth is that all of these people are engaged in an elaborate Kabuki show. Petreaus pretends to be telling the truth, knowing full well that all the Senators know he’s lying. They pretend to take him at his word. They make ritual obeisance to his uniform (How far we have travelled from the founder’s suspicion of a standing army). They ask questions they know he will not fully answer. He gives them answers that he knows they know are misleading, incomplete and disingenuous. After it’s done they all shake hands and smile.

Interesting note: the clip goes on to shows a teaser about John Hagee, the McCain loving bigot. I’d be interested to see the whole thing.