Skip to content

Joe Courtney endorses Obama

Joe Courtney endorsed Obama today. I suppose we can argue about timing, but better late than never, and better now than later. After yesterday, it seems likely that Hillary will die the death of a thousand cuts, as the remaining superdelegates announce overwhelmingly for Obama.

Here’s Joe’s Announcement in full. It’s especially good that he recognizes the young people at UConn who helped put him in Congress:

5/21/2008

Today, I am pleased to announce my endorsement of Senator Barack Obama for President of the United States.

Our country has experienced a remarkable contest for the Democratic nomination with a field of unprecedented talent, including Connecticut’s senior Senator Chris Dodd whom I originally endorsed. The race has boiled down to an historic choice between the nation’s first African American or woman president, and the party, and our nation, are richer for this contest.

The results last evening from Oregon have clarified that Barack Obama will be the nominee for our party. As John McCain continues to act with a free hand in the Republican contest, it is clear that we must unite and rally around a nominee to give the nation a strong alternative in the Fall. With our economy languishing and our foreign policy in tatters, the last thing our country can afford is a third Bush term, which I believe John McCain would deliver if elected President.

While I am making this endorsement, I want to take the time to recognize Senator Clinton for her contributions to this contest and to our nation. Hers was a gutsy effort, and one that spoke to the economic anxiety that so many in eastern Connecticut and across the nation are feeling after eight years of George Bush’s rule. As the father of a young daughter, I was also heartened that we took a step closer to the long overdue day when we elect a woman to serve as President. Senator Clinton has been an important leader of our party and will continue to play a key role in the years ahead.

I am enthusiastically endorsing Barack Obama because I believe that he can lead this nation and bridge the partisan divide that has hindered progress in our nation over the past eight years. Barack Obama has demonstrated leadership in pledging a new direction to drawdown our forces in Iraq and end our disastrous engagement that has stretched our military to the breaking point, damaged our economy, and diverted our attention from terrorist threats in Afghanistan and across the globe. Senator Obama’s economic vision would revive our sluggish economy and invest in our middle class which has been so neglected in the Bush era. The power of Barack’s words is matched by the force of his ideas.

In addition, by endorsing Senator Obama I am keeping faith with the new and young voters who helped propel me to a razor-thin victory in 2006. At UConn and on campuses across eastern Connecticut and the nation, Barack Obama has inspired new voters to engage in the political process and make their voices heard. A torch has been passed to a new generation to help solve the serious challenges facing our nation.

Our country is in desperate need of change in the White House. Today, I endorse Barack Obama to deliver that change in January after victory in November.

On another subject, and another Joe, if you click on the link you will see that the Courant is still referring to Lieberman as an “independent Democrat”. Since when is there such a thing? It’s a little like me calling myself an atheistic Catholic. I might find the moniker convenient, but the Pope would have a legitimate grievance if the newspapers played along and let me steal his brand. Lieberman is a lot of things, few of them good, but he is not a Democrat, no matter what limiting adjective you use.

Note: This post was changed a bit from one that was up for a short period. I inserted Joe’s announcement and made a few other minor changes.

Barack takes a shot at corporate media

More evidence that Obama gets it, and has not yet been ruined by Washington:

Democrat Barack Obama said on Sunday he would pursue a vigorous antitrust policy if he becomes U.S. president and singled out the media industry as one area where government regulators would need to be watchful as consolidation increases.

“I will assure that we will have an antitrust division that is serious about pursuing cases,” the Illinois senator told an audience of mostly senior citizens in Oregon.

“There are going to be areas, in the media for example where we’re seeing more and more consolidation, that I think (it) is legitimate to ask…is the consumer being served?”

Sad news

From TPM:

New York Rep. Vito Fossella said Tuesday he will not seek re-election as a result of “personal mistakes,” a decision that comes after a drunken driving arrest and disclosure that he fathered a child in an extramarital affair.

For a while it looked like he was going to tough it out. Too bad.

McCain campaigns on fear itself

According to the New York Times, all John McCain has to do to put Barack Obama “on the defensive” is to criticize him on a foreign policy issue:

Senator John McCain put Senator Barack Obama on the foreign policy defensive once again Monday, criticizing him here in his hometown for saying Iran did not pose the serious threat to the United States that the Soviet Union once did.

In order to make the charge, McCain had to mischaracterize what Obama said, but we’ll let that pass for the moment.

I guess this is a test: Are the American people as stupid as John McCain and the New York Times thinks they are? I can remember the days of fallout shelters and instructional films on what we should do when the bombs dropped. Many people believed that an all out nuclear war was nearly inevitable, and both sides had the ability to make that a reality. And, by the way, the Soviet Union was evil incarnate too, just like Iran. By any measure, the Soviet Union was the bigger threat, and most people with an ounce of sense and a shred of memory know that.

Have we really sunk so low in our public discourse that a politician can be said to be “on the defensive” for saying something that is demonstrably, indisputably, incontestably, incontrovertibly, indubitably, undeniably true?

I guess we’re about to find out. Personally, I think that the last 8 years have opened a lot of eyes and, to quote the old song, we won’t get fooled again. Fearmongering has run its course.

At least I hope it has.

Contributions for Andy, et. al.

MGB, a faithful reader, asked, in a comment to a recent post, how one goes about making a contribution to Andy Maynard to help him reach the 300 contributors that he needs to get public financing.

I’ve attached a certification form, which you can download below in either PDF or Word Format. If you want to contribute to someone other than Andy you should download the Word version and make changes as appropriate. You need to know whether the candidate is trying to qualify for public financing, of course.

You should send the form to the candidate’s treasurer, along with your check of $5.00 to 100.00. In Andy’s case they should be send to Dennis Popp, 41 Cottage Street, Groton, CT 06340.

I know, by the way, that Betsy Ritter, state rep from Waterford and liberal drinker is looking for her last few contributors, so if you live in Waterford (remember, you have to be in the person’s district to count), send Betsy a check. Her treasurer is Bridget Baird, 28 Old Mill Road, Quaker Hill, CT 06375. It’s not yet clear if Betsy has an opponent. Andy does, though it remains to be seen how vigourous a campaign she will wage.

By the way, we attended Andy’s convention last night. Very efficiently run. We were in and out in no time.

Contribution Form (PDF)
Contribution form (Word)

Stealing from the poor to give to the banks

Dean Baker, writing at Truthout, reports that Senator Dodd’s bill, which allegedly helps homeowners avoid foreclosure, may end up being financed by diverting money from rental assistance programs for the poor. According to Baker, Dodd’s bill does too much for the banks, and not enough for the homeowners, who may still end up losing their homes in time:

Congress has shown little interest in ensuring the new guarantee prices reflect fundamentals, making it likely many of the people “helped” under the program will end up facing foreclosure a second time. However, to make matters worse, they came up with the idea of financing the plan by taking away a stream of funding that had been dedicated to help low-income renters.

That’s right; Congress wants to take away money from low-income renters to help bankers that made bad loans in the housing bubble. As we all know, when the banks are in trouble, it is not the time to talk about the free market.

Once again the root cause is Republican intransigence. While they had no problem getting taxpayers to pony up to help Bear Stearns, or to provide money for homebuilders, it’s a different story when it comes to any bill that will help regular people, even if that help is being inefficiently delivered:

Reports are that Senator Shelby will only agree to the new FHA program if it is paid for by non-taxpayer funds. Senator Dodd’s bill also creates a housing trust fund with resources from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to build or preserve rental housing for extremely low and very low income people. Senator Shelby wants those funds to be used to pay for the new FHA program instead.

“After the $30 billion taxpayer guaranteed bail out of Bear Sterns and the $25 billion Senate-passed taxpayer funded bail out for homebuilders, for Committee Republicans to insist that the taxpayers should not pay $1.7 billion to prevent homeowners from losing their homes, has to be called what it is – hypocrisy,” said Sheila Crowley, President of the National Low Income Housing Coalition.

As Senator Dodd has learned to his sorrow, it takes 60 Democrats to pass a bill, and only one Republican to stop it, given the Harry Reid filibuster rules. It might behoove the Democrats to consider that every time the Republicans do this sort of thing they make yet another small contribution to the crushing defeat they seem poised to endure in the fall. They have been in power so long, and have gotten away with this sort of hypocrisy for so long that they are unable to see that times have changed. The Democrats should call their bluff. Let the country watch them filibuster a bill to help people avoid foreclosure. Make them really stand up and put their mouths where their money is. Will they really want to do that in an election year?

Andy Maynard needs 300 friends.

Today my wife and I hosted an event for Andy Maynard, our state Senator. In order to qualify for campaign financing funds, Andy needs to get donations from 300 individuals in his district, so the purpose of this event was to get as many donors as possible for Andy, with the amounts of the donations being somewhat secondary. My wife organized the party, with lots of help from other Groton Democrats.

The day started out great, weather-wise, but the cloudy, near cold weather arrived promptly along with our first guests. Nonetheless, judging by the amounts of food and drink consumed, people seemed to have a good time.

Anyway, we made some progress toward Andy’s goal of 300 contributors. That number, by the way, might need to be reconsidered. It doesn’t sound like that many, particularly given the fact that a donation of as low as $5.00 is acceptable, but in practice it is turning out to be fairly difficult.

Here’s Andy, with State Representatives Betsy Ritter and Elissa Wright, neither of whom yet have opponents. Andy does have an opponent, which made me feel better (I don’t know if I can say the same for Andy), because I would have felt a little funny asking people to help him get state money that he wouldn’t need.

If you’re in Andy’s district please consider donating to help get Andy to 300. If you’re in another district, and there’s a candidate you support, make a donation to him or her, even if in a nominal amount so they can qualify for public financing.

True religion from the center of the universe

This being Sunday, our thoughts naturally turn to true Religion. Happily, yesterday, the mailman delivered food for thought, addressed to a fellow named Resident who gets a lot of mail here, though I’ve never actually met him.

We all know that Religion and Science are now locked in a deadly battle. At the moment, the battle is over evolution. On one side we have science armed with mountains of evidence. On the other hand we have a book authored by some fools in the desert in which we have a fable about two people in a garden. Obviously that one’s too close to call, but we all thought that in at least some respects religion had conceded some scientific claims.

Not so. It turns out that opposing evolution is for wusses. If you’re going to deny masses of evidence, why not go whole hog? Real men, according to the Geocentric Bible Foundation, are into geocentrism. That’s right. Lo, though even the Catholic Church saw fit to admit it may have erred a teeny bit on the Galileo thing, true Christians soldier on.

If you’re truly interested, you can see larger views by clicking on the images.

Interestingly these folks seem to be geocentric-centric, in that among other things, they claim:

That the mobility of the earth is the only place where science and the Bible have come into real conflict, and is the starting point for all churches that have compromised the authority of Scripture.

Which might make for an interesting debate between the lunatics at the geocentric asylum and those at the Discovery Institute.

The pamphlet offers a free book for anyone who returns the postage paid postcard. A cynic might say that in the guise of a tax free religious organization, the geocentric folks have hit on a way to acquire one of the most valuable databases in the entire US. Can you imagine any list more precious than one of people who refuse to believe that the earth goes around the sun? If you can sell people on that one, you can sell them on anything.

Friday Night Music-Little Richard

One of the originals. Good Golly Miss Molly:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MhybWFjuN2g[/youtube]

Next, as a free bonus, something almost completely different. Who would think you could make this song rock?

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtgFVk70yMc[/youtube]

Obama responds

This guy is good.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sOlaso_7Z8[/youtube]