Skip to content

Party tomorrow

The Groton Democratic Town Committee invites all and sundry to a political gathering tomorrow at the German Club, Frohsinn Hall, 54 Greenmanville Avenue, Mystic.

Along with the usual Groton suspects, this is your chance to meet one or more of the following:

Congressman Joe Courtney (who can’t stay long because of another commitment)
Dan Malloy (possibly)
Mary Glassman
Denise Merrill
Kevin Lembo
State Senator Andy Maynard
State Representative Elissa Wright
Jerry Garcia’s wife: Magdalena Adamczyk Garcia

There will also be some representatives of various other candidates.

Suggested donation:

$10.00 for victims of the Bush recession.

$25.00 for anyone who’s not

Cash Bar

Music by Kit Johnson

UPDATE: Dan Malloy has confirmed that he is coming.


So considerate

From a notice I just received from my insurance company:

Over the past several years, changes in coverage such as special deductibles that apply only to the perils of windstorm and/or hurricane have been implemented as part of our overall effort to provide you with the best protection at the lowest reasonable cost.

So good to know they’re looking out for me.


The power of prayer

Former (thank god the forces of nature that drive all things) Congressman Mark Souder, the deeply devout Christian can’t understand why he couldn’t stop [insert your favorite word for the act here] his abstinence touting mistress, even after praying to Jehovah:

“I prayed multiple times a day, sang hymns with emotion and tears, felt each time that it wouldn’t happen again, read the Bible every morning. . . . So how in the world did I have a ‘torrid’ (which is an accurate word) many-year affair? How could I compartmentalize it so much?

Basically, he could do it because he was a gold plated hypocrite. But not to worry, as the story at the link shows, he is forgiven by his peers, who have a way of forgiving their hypocritical political or religious friends while extending no mercy to their foes (not for them Jesus’ injunction to love your enemy). Souder is apparently hitting the confessional circuit, where no doubt he’ll be a big draw, see e.g., John Rowland.

Meanwhile, what of the over 200,000 college students who lost student loans, courtesy of Mark Souder, because they were convicted of minor drug offenses. No forgiveness for them, and no second act on the lecture circuit.


A delusional nation

A friend of mine forwarded an email he received from a right wing acquaintance about Obama. I won’t quote from the email, but I think it’s fair to say that any reality based person reading it would wonder what planet the person lived on. Among other things, the writer claimed that Obama has spent all his time blaming George Bush for the state we are in. Setting aside the fact that he would be perfectly justified in doing so, it’s a charge that seems peculiarly divorced from reality. From a purely political perspective it would have been great if Obama and the Democrats had spent the last year and a half invoking George Bush at every turn, but it’s asking too much to expect the Democrats to coordinate anything these days.

Part of the reason these things happen, I think, is that rightwingers are allowed to make these charges in environments where they know they will not be questioned. Consider Steve King, idiot Congressman from Iowa:

Rep. Steve King (R-IA) is standing by his comments that President Obama has a “default mechanism” that “favors the black person” in a dispute — and says that Americans need to talk about this.

The natural follow up question would be: What on earth are you talking about? But that question never gets asked, because comments like this are always made while the person in question is safely ensconced in a right wing radio host’s studio, or in the friendly confines of Fox and Friends. In this case, the comment was made to G. Gordon Liddy, convicted criminal.

The one example King gave was Obama’s defense of Louis Gates, Jr., a matter in which Obama took no official action (and to which his first reaction was absolutely correct), but King charged, without a single example, that there is an “inclination on the part of the White House and the justice department and perhaps others within the administration to break on the side of favoritism with regard to race”.

Can there be any doubt that if there was a scintilla of truth to this charge that the actual facts would have been bruited about by the right wing? But we live in a world in which the right, at least, really is allowed to have not only its own opinion, but its own facts, which go unchallenged when asserted, and which are then amplified by repetition by a “mainstream” press that sees its duty as merely to report what is said, and not to provide context or correction. Have you ever heard one of these folks moaning about socialism being asked to define the term, much less being asked to give concrete examples of any actual Obama initiatives the real socialists approve?

As a result of this fact free discourse, we are a nation of politically deluded people. Maybe that’s appropriate, since we are also the most religiously deluded people in the Western World. It makes for a toxic mix, and doesn’t leave much margin of error for the rest of us, since if the info at the link is true, rational people are a minority in this country that depend for their survival on their ability to induce a certain percentage of the crazy to cast rational votes.


Couldn’t have happened

There’s some really stunning news in this morning’s paper. It seems that BP took “shortcuts” and put finishing the well ahead of safety:

To save time and drilling costs, BP took “shortcuts” that may have led to the oil rig explosion and the spill in the Gulf of Mexico, according to a letter released Monday by two House Democrats leading an investigation of the disaster.

The letter, sent in advance of congressional hearings with senior oil executives this week, paints a damning picture of five decisions the lawmakers said the oil firm took “to speed finishing the well,” which was running “significantly behind schedule.” Marshaling e-mails, interviews and documents, the lawmakers said: “In effect, it appears that BP repeatedly chose risky procedures in order to reduce costs and save time, and made minimal efforts to contain the added risk.”

Who could ever imagine that a corporation doing business in America would disregard the few rules we actually have in place and take “shortcuts”? Certainly no corporate officer would weigh the environment of the entire Gulf Coast against corporate profits and, funny thing, big bonuses and find the scale tipped in favor of profit. Who could have predicted it? Certainly not the Congress that wrote the law limiting liability to $75 million dollars, the law that they are now falling all over themselves to say they want to repeal, but which, what with all the press of business, just might never get repealed. Surely not Obama, who ditched his opposition to off shore drilling to try to look “bi-partisan” and shill for votes anyone in his (or her) right mind knew he’d never get. Certainly not the American people, particularly the folks who live by the Gulf, whose leaders are still pressing for more drilling, without much blowback from the home folks. Aren’t unregulated corporations supposed to avoid this sort of thing because somehow it’s in their long term best interest to do so?

All I can say is that this story certainly deserved the front page coverage it got in the Day. Absolutely shocking and absolutely unexpected. The next thing you know we’ll find out the bankers don’t give a damn whether they bring down the world economy, so long as their bonuses are secure. Now that would be a shocker indeed.


Truly Astonishing

Lee Whitnum, the Senate candidate who made Merrick Alpert look like a powerhouse, and who didn’t even get to go on stage with Merrick at the convention (among other things she went to the wrong place) has filed suit against Dan Malloy for calling her an anti-Semite.

Now, I am actually quite sympathetic to her basic premise: AIPAC drives our discourse on Israel, often contrary to our interests and sometimes contrary to Israel’s. And it’s quite true that one can be against AIPAC without being anti-Semitic. Lots of Jews disagree with its positions, and I think we can agree that there are not all that many anti-Semitic Jews. She may even have a case against Dan if he really said what she alleges. My recollection is that calling someone a racist or an anti-Semite is libel or slander per se, but I could be wrong about that.

But I must say I’m astounded by one thing. According to Connecticut News Junkie, the woman is about to publish a book about AIPAC. A whole book, by someone who could write this, taken from her self authored complaint against Malloy:

“At no time did Ms. Whitnum speak, nor write, disparagingly about any religious group therefore, the plaintiff seeks to define what it means to be ‘anti-Semitic’ and to make it defamatory to use the term to stifle much needed discussion as it related to the well-being of the United States of America,” Whitnum writes in her lawsuit.

A whole book, written in that style? My god. Maybe she thinks that’s the way lawyers write. If her whole book is like that, she’ll have to pay people to read it.

By the way, Whitnum makes a common mistake. She refers to Malloy as the “plaintiff”, when he’s actually the defendant. At least I hope she’s referring to Malloy, or her merely ungrammatical and tedious sentence becomes completely incoherent.


Ted Kennedy

They say you can judge a person by the company he or she keeps. I submit that for politicians, at least, you can also judge them by the enemies they make. By that measure, Ted Kennedy was one of the greats:

For decades after his brothers John and Robert were assassinated, Sen. Edward Kennedy received many threats that he would meet the same fate, according to FBI documents released Monday.

More than 2,000 pages of partially redacted documents from 1961 to 1985 show that Kennedy, the veteran Massachusetts Democrat who died from brain cancer last year, received death threats from individuals and organizations including the Ku Klux Klan, the National Socialist White People’s Party and “Minutemen” groups.

It would certainly be an honor to be despised by those groups.


Saving journalism

I was asked to plug this upcoming forum, which I’m more than happy to do. The press release follows

Public Forum: “Democracy vs. the Propaganda State:
Why We Must Support Independent Media and Build
a Real Alternative to Corporate Power”

John Nichols, The Nation magazine Washington correspondent and co-author

of the new book, “The Death and Life of American Journalism:
The Media Revolution that will Begin the World Again”
will discuss the crisis in U.S. media at a June 19th public forum in New
Haven, CT

The Nation magazine’s Washington correspondent, John Nichols, is coming to
New Haven, CT’s Center Church on the Green’s Parish House on Saturday,
June 19th, where he’ll discuss his new book, “The Death and Life of
American Journalism: The Media Revolution that will Begin the World
Again,” co-authored with Robert McChesney, which examines the crisis in
U.S. journalism and proposes a rescue plan that looks back to our Founding
Fathers to save the nation’s endangered daily newspapers, investigative
reporting and democracy.

In this public forum titled, “Democracy vs. the Propaganda State: Why We
Must Support Independent Media and Build a Real Alternative to Corporate
Power,” Nichols will argue that journalism should be seen as a public
good, much like education and defense spending. He believes the federal
government should intervene to assist the ailing newspaper industry —
plagued by closings and layoffs — as a free press and an informed
electorate are among the most important elements in a well-functioning
democracy. Democratic nations economically equivalent to ours, such as
Canada, Britain, Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany,
Austria, Denmark, Switzerland, Sweden etc. spend between $8 billion to $45
billion on public media and other subsidies. The U.S. government spends
only $400 million.

The forum, sponsored by locally produced Between The Lines Radio
Newsmagazine, will be held from 2 -4 p.m. Saturday, June 19th at the
Center Church on the Green Parish House (Pratt Hall), 311 Temple St., New
Haven, CT. John Nichol’s talk will be preceded by a press conference
between 1 and 1:45 p.m. at the Parish House. A Q&A session with the
audience will follow Nichols’ talk along with a booksigning and reception
with light refreshments.

John Nichols comes to this Connecticut event after serving as the keynote
speaker at The International Federation of Journalists 2010 World
Congress, May 25-28, 2010, in Cadiz, Spain where they launched the IFJ
report on the future of journalism.

John Nichols and Robert McChesney are co-founders of the nation’s largest
media reform organization, Free Press www.freepress.net. Free Press works
to promote diverse and independent media ownership, strong public media,
quality journalism, and universal access to communications.

Net proceeds from this public forum will benefit Squeaky Wheel
Productions, nonprofit distributor of Between The Lines Radio
Newsmagazine, broadcast on 50 radio stations in the U.S. including WPKN
89.5 FM in Bridgeport and WESU 88.1 FM in Middletown. Suggested donation
is $15, $5 for students. Seating is limited, advance reservations
recommended. For tickets or more information call 1-(203) 268-8446 or
visit www.squeakywheel.net or www.btlonline.org. Media sponsors of this
event are WPKN Radio 89.5 FM, The New Haven Advocate and Fairfield
Weekly.

This is quite timely. This morning’s Times carried a story about the FTC, which is itself looking in to the issue, and trying to come up with ways to save American newspapers. Among other things, they are looking at whether it would be advisable to change the antitrust laws as a means toward this salutary end.

For what it’s worth, I’ll once again pass along my thoughts.

Start from the proposition that the future is on the internet. My son, who writes for a newspaper, does not get a paper newspaper, and that is true of most younger people these days. We get three, but I get most of my news on my Ipad.

Like most people, I’m happy to pay for content, so long as it is convenient and reasonably priced. When I am surfing the net and I click on a link, I don’t want to be met by a barrier and a toll if I want to read an article on a newspaper site to which I might otherwise rarely go. I propose treating content providers like TV channels in a cable system. For one monthly fee I can visit any channel I like. If I want premium channels, I pay a little more. You could do the same with newspapers, magazines and other periodicals on the internet. It wouldn’t take rocket science to figure out a reasonable way to divvy up the money. My suggestion would be that a disproportionate share of a subscriber’s payment should go to local media. In my case, the New London Day might get a fairly large cut of my subscription fee. The rest could be allocated by hits, or in some other fashion that makes sense from the industry perspective. It would be important to make sure the system allowed for new entrants. The fee would simply be added on to the regular monthly internet bill. If you didn’t want access to news on the internet, you wouldn’t have to pay it, but you’d be kissing the New York Times or any other participating paper good-bye.

At the moment, newspaper sites are either free, or subscription based, like the Wall Street Journal. The subscription covers a single publication. That’s a bit like providing cable television, then making you pay through the nose for each channel you might want to have the privilege to watch. The one fee for universal access, or tiered fees, makes a lot more sense.


Saturday trip

Yesterday my wife and I had a dinner date in Glastonbury, and we decided to leave extra early and wander around in the Chester area. We left while the weather was fairly good, but by the time we got half way there we encountered torrential rains, which sort of put a damper on the project.

However, the rain let up when we arrived at the Sundial Gardens in Higganum, a place we enjoy because it combines my wife’s love of gardens with my love of tea.

The garden is relatively small, but it in incredibly well designed. Very peaceful. Right now, because of the strange weather we’ve had so far, it’s not quite ready for optimal viewing, portions of it being roped off, but I would recommend it to anyone seeking a place for a short stop.

Here’s some pictures.

This last picture depicts trees that have been pleached, trained to grow, in this case, in the form of an arch.

The tea selection is quite good, but be warned. The owner, Ragna Tischler-Goddard, will give you an education, at some length, on the finer points of tea, if you express the slightest interest. She also carries a great selection of the best accompaniment to a fine tea: chocolate.


Blumental Fundraiser Next Week

I’ve attached a copy of a flier I received regarding a fundraiser being held here in Groton for Dick Blumenthal at 35 Beach Pond Road. The event is scheduled for Sunday, June 20th at 1:00 PM.

This is the first time I can recall that Blumenthal has come to Groton for an event centered around him. He’s been here on countless occasions to help the local Democrats raise money, or to help local candidates, so here’s our chance to show our appreciation for his past efforts.


blumenthal june 20