Skip to content

Friday Night Music-Bob Dylan

Okay, I’ve always wanted to post these two songs. Bob Dylan again, but let’s face it, he deserves it.

Both of these songs are optimistic in their own way and, I hope, timely right now. The best my addled brain could come up with tonight to celebrate what may be the dawning of a new era.

The Times They Are A Changing:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lZ_XwLSN45I[/youtube]

This one’s a bit more obscure, but it’s one of my personal favorites. I was hoping to find the Chieftain’s version from the Dylan Tribute Concert, because I think their version is better than Dylan’s, but couldn’t find it. The Hour That The Ship Comes In

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vhNCRlXm1s[/youtube]

I’ve always thought the Democrats could make use of music like this at their conventions, instead of the dreck and pablum (Stevie Wonder excepted) to which they subject the country every four years. There’s tons of music that could reinforce the Democratic message, and maybe keep the network talking heads quiet between speeches, assuming you could get big enough names to perform.

Obama’s speech

For the record, I thought it was excellent. You can quibble about points he failed to make, or that he might have emphasized more, but he made his case and he put McCain in his place nicely.

I don’t have the video skills, and didn’t tape the speech in any event, but I have a feeling that one could make an effective pro-Obama video by doing a split screen contrast between Obama’s speech and whatever piece of crap McCain delivers in the Twin Cities.

Utter contempt for the American people

At least it wasn’t Joe Lieberman.

20 years ago (is it really that long) the first George Bush chose Dan Quayle as his running mate, primarily, it seemed and still seems, to avoid nominating anyone who could possibly be perceived as being better presidential material than himself. He had to look long and far, but he found someone. Secondarily, the condescending thinking was that Dan Quayle’s Robert Redford good looks (I’m not making this up) would cause women to flock to the ticket. Bush did a gross disservice to the country, but at least it was a result of his own personal insecurities, so it was understandable and almost forgivable, in a weird sort of way.

John McCain’s choice was not made out of insecurity. It is a product of a mix of personal ambition, desperation, cynicism, and contempt for the American people. It is not a stretch to say that, were she elected, she would be a very weak heartbeat away from the presidency, not to mention the real possibility that McCain’s Alzheimer’s may advance to the point that it can no longer be hidden.

We have heard nothing from McCain about Obama for the past several months that was not centered, in one way or another, on Obama’s lack of preparation to be “commander in chief”. McCain now all but announces that the talking point, which he will of course continue to use, lacks all validity by asking the country to install someone as president in waiting who has served as the mayor of a town of 8,000 and one year as the corrupt governor of the most corrupt state in the country.

If that’s all we knew about her, then one could still argue that she might make a good president. After all, the argument about experience is one made primarily by folks like McCain who have a long history of failure, which they trumpet as experience. But if this woman has any redeeming qualities, they are few and far between. Elected on a pledge to clean out the cesspool that is the Alaskan Republican party, she immediately settled in to the culture of corruption. She wants to teach creationism in the schools and she’s a darling of the fundamentalists.

No doubt the McCain campaign will dredge up a few “former Hillary supporters” who will say this confirms their decision to vote for McCain. No doubt, too, that the press will pivot from Obama to this story for a few days, and will hail McCain’s choice as a political masterstroke. One must wonder, though, whether McCain’s decision will stand even the short term test of time. But, according to our press corps, gimmick that it might be, it won’t matter after three days, so it could be a brilliant move:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DD_Ds_mWjQ[/youtube]

They sure do love them some McCain, don’t they. Had Obama done this we’d be hearing about the utter irresponsibility of such a daffy choice. But since it’s Maverick John, his contempt for the American people is irrelevant. It may work politically as long as needed, and after that- Who Cares?

Economic Progress, McCain style

Hilariously funny. Don’t give up, the good part’s toward the end.

Party Time

Live blogging at Groton Headquarters. It’s still early, and we’re hoping for a bigger crowd, but it’s already getting a bit crowded. I’m sitting here by computer, which will serve as back up television, if we have an overflow. Some pictures:

Mary and Liz (above) manning the table at the entrance.

The assembled multitudes watch the pre-lims.

Barack greets his fans.

Divided?

The press has been playing up “divisions” in a Democratic Party that has, perhaps, never been more united. The idea that there is a vast reservoir of former Clinton supporters that will support McCain has always been somewhat ludicrous. The number of Clintonites who vote for McCain will likely be swamped by the number of Republicans who don’t bother to vote. Back in December polls were showing that rank and file Democrats were happy with their candidates, while Republicans were not. But still, the “divided” story continues, though, as in the article to which I’ve linked, there’s often not much substance to it beyond the headlines.

We don’t hear about the fact that McCain was unable to break 70% in his own primaries after he had locked up the nomination and been endorsed by all “major” candidates. Nor have we been hearing about the fact that the biggest crowd in the Twin Cities next week will be at a rally for Ron Paul.

Democrats are energized. Republicans are divided and dispirited. You won’t hear about that on the news, but it doesn’t make it any less true.

The Times notices Suskind

It is only fair that I note after two posts on the subject (here and here) that the New York Times has finally covered Ron Suskind’s book, The Way of the World. Not on the news page, but in the form of a book review.

If the Times news department had doubts about the book’s accuracy (as one commenter here suggested) they didn’t tell the reviewer, who gives the book high marks.

Speaking of the alleged inaccuracies, it appears to me, from a brief scan on the internet, that most of the claims of inaccuracies relate to one item in the book. The CIA claims that Suskind got two men with the same name mixed up. The review details a number of other allegations that, so far as I know, have not been successfully refuted. One critically important allegation is Suskind’s claim “that more than three months before initiating the Iraq war President Bush and his highest officials received information, via the British, from Iraq’s intelligence chief, Tahir Habbush, that Saddam Hussein had destroyed all his weapons of mass destruction years before — information that the officials ‘buried’ but that turned out to be true.”

I’ve mentioned in the past that one way the Republicans manipulate the press, and through it the public discourse, is to concentrate attention on peripheral issues in order to divert attention from those that are more important. My favorite example is the brilliant way in which they diverted attention from the undisputed fact that Ronald Reagan sold arms to Iran to the murkier question of whether he was aware that the proceeds of the sale were diverted to Nicaragua. The indisputable impeachable offense receded into the background. Books like Suskind’s get the same treatment.

Kucinich rocks the house

He always made more sense than any of them.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLRYAzBJdb0[/youtube]

Video Press Releases

More from your liberal media.

I don’t watch much television, and of course we’re not in a swing state, so I haven’t seen this in action, but this post at The Washington Monthly is entirely and depressingly believable.

John McCain doesn’t actually have to pay to run his ads on television. The networks take care of that for him, giving him free time. It’s a neat trick. He releases a new ad to the media that he says he intends to run in the swing states. The networks play the ad incessantly. The more outrageous the better. The recent “Hillary was right” ad is an example.

In fact, McCain almost never pays anyone to actually run the ads. He doesn’t have to, because the media obligingly plays them for him, for free. This is not a “fool me once” situation. For our national broadcast media, and when it comes to Republicans, “won’t get fooled again” never enters the equation. They fall for it every time. In a rational world the networks would be before the bar of justice for illegal donations to the McCain campaign.

Hillary Done Good

From my vantage point, bleary as I was late last night, I thought Hillary did a good job. Whether she meant it or not (and I’m not buying into the body language crap, yet another new low in journalism), is almost beside the point. As a man I presume was wise once said, “The secret of success is sincerity. Once you can fake that you’ve got it made”.

If Hillary wasn’t sincere, she did a great job of faking it. If she can keep that up, and Bill can follow suit, we’ve got it made.