Skip to content

Ramblings from Vermont

We have had only intermittent opportunity to connect to the Internet this week, and have not bothered to watch the idiot box, so we have some blessed relief from the dismal news, though we have some intimations of stock market crashes, still crazy Republicans, and revolution in Britain. Since my knowledge of the latest events does not rise to the low level I normally require before I commit punditry, I decline to comment on any of this, except to say that there have been no surprises. Well, one sort of surprise. I understand the Sox are still ahead in the East.

So, just in order to keep my hand in, some pictures taken here in the fair state of Vermont, and in the not so fair state of New Hampshire.

Recently, we went to the American Precision Museum in Windsor, Vermont. The area around Springfield was once host to a large number of machine shops. This was back in the day when Americans actually made things.

It’s a small museum, but well worth seeing, if for nothing else than the incredible miniatures created by a guy named John Aschauer. Below is a picture of a portion of a model he made of the machine shop in Germany in which he worked as a boy of 14. He also made the model when he was 14, so you figure he was probably working 10 hour days and had the energy and initiative to make this incredibly detailed model. Sort of awe inspiring.


Between the wars he emigrated to the U.S., where he continued in his profession and continued to make incredibly detailed working models of the machines with which he worked. This is a portion of one; you can see the silhouettes that give an idea of the scale.


Later in the day we went to the Augustus Saint-Gaudens house in Cornish, New Hampshire, which we have visited before, but the folks who were staying with us had not yet seen. The National Park Service runs the place, so make it a point to see it before the budget cutting ax puts it in mothballs. When I was a kid I collected coins, so I was very early aware of Saint-Gaudens, who designed the most beautiful coins ever minted. Not that I had any, as they were all gold pieces, but I coveted them. Below is a courtyard off of one of the studios. The grounds are jam packed with his sculptures. I don’t know if you can call them copies or originals, as I’m guessing they were cast from the same molds as the originals.


This is a sculpture he did for Henry Adams, the original of which casts a spell over the grave of Adams’ wife, who committed suicide in a rather ghastly way. An incredible evocation of grief and the mystery of death.

General Sherman:


He also did a great standing Lincoln, but I didn’t happen to run into it. This next sculpture would be familiar to anyone who has been to the Boston Common, the relief of Colonel Shaw (I think he was a colonel) leading his black troops to death and glory in the Civil War.


Here’s the view from the house. That’s Mount Ascutney in the background. Not too shabby, and you can see why he and his wife fell in love with the location.


So, back to Vermont. Here we have Moonlight in Vermont from the deck of the house we’re renting.


I think in my last post, I mentioned that I bicycled up here. I am somewhat pleased to report that I did make it to Vermont, though not all the way here to Ludlow. My wife picked me up in Bellows Falls. I attribute my failure to the low tax religion of New Hampshire and the consequent poor state of the roads. If you do any bicycling you know that the road surface makes a huge difference. My route took me up Route 63 in New Hampshire, where their idea of road repairs apparently consists of throwing some sort of cheap patching material on the roads and letting cars run over it to pack it down. The road was covered with the stuff. The result is an unbelievably rough surface, which makes level ground into a hill; hills into torture, and downhills into bouncy adventures. Suffice to say, the 60 miles I did do was the moral equivalent of the 90 I intended to do, so I decided to declare victory once I entered Vermont.

Given the infrequency with which I have had access to wireless, this may very well be my last post until I return. Enjoy the respite.

Friday Night Music

Before I get to the music, I have to explain why this is going up so early. I got up at 5 in the morning and began my bike trek to Vermont, phase one to end in Amherst, where I am now. I booked a room at the Amherst Motel, where I had been told by the nice lady that took my reservation that they had wireless. And, indeed, they do, and you can get it if you happen to be in one of the rooms adjoining the office, which I was, until they moved me after I pointed out that the room they sent me too had an unmade bed, dirty towels on the floor and other signs that it had not been cleaned. I don’t know, to be honest, if I’d have kept the room if I knew about the wi-fi limitations. It turns out, however, that the Town of Amherst has free wi-fi in the center of town, which is where I am now, but I won’t be for long, since I’m tired and sore.

So, to the music. I noticed Lon Seidman put this on his Facebook page yesterday, but I saw it here at Why Evolution is True.

This is unlike anything I’ve posted on Friday Night before. I just got s kick out of it. For all I know it’s already swept the planet. There is a local connection, because the musicians call themselves Connecticut Mariachi:

Want to place bets on how this will come out?

Chuck Shumer says the Republicans aren’t playing fair on the FAA:

“The FAA is in limbo. Airports are the economic engine of the small communities around the country, and that economic engine is now stuck in neutral,” Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) told reporters Wednesday. “Under the cover of the debt ceiling crisis, they are holding these aviation workers hostage until they get everything they want…they have taken brinksmanship again one step too far.”

“It’s as if someone is holding a gun to your head and saying give me your money….,” he said. “You can hurt innocent people by not getting your own way.”

Whatever, or whoever, could have given the Republicans the idea that this sort of thing would work?

UPDATE: Good God, Obama is apportioning blame equally. The man never learns.

Say it ain’t so, Joe

I began to suspect that my Congressman, Joe Courtney, voted for the Reward Republican Extortion Act of 2001 when I searched my email inbox and found nothing from his office, an unusual occurrence to say the least. Chris Murphy’s email explaining (trumpeting, really) his no vote was there, but no missives were there from Joe. It was a vote I,m sure he didn’t care to publicize. I did confirm the bad news on his website.

I briefly flirted with making a declaration that I’d never give him money again (not that he’d care, at this point), but, truth be told, he’s too nice a guy, so I’ll stick with him, after properly venting the next time I see him. Obama, on the other hand will never see dime one of my money again, not that he cares, given the loot he’ll be getting from the bankers.

The End is Near

Introduction. I’ve been working on this post off and on for a while now. It’s not really ready for prime time, but I decided to put it up in its immature state because the debt ceiling charade we’ve just witnessed demonstrates very conclusively that I’m right, and I want to appear somewhat prescient. Also, I’m out of here on vacation in a few days, and I won’t have time to polish it. So, here goes:

I have of late, but wherefore I know not, lost all my mirth. This has resulted in rather desultory writing on this blog, so I decided to step back and figure out what happened to my mirth. Having done so, I take this opportunity to report back to my readers, if any there be, the true and accurate cause of my mirthless condition. This being a political blog, it should come as no surprise that the source of my ennui is political. In a word, or a few words, I am sort of bummed out because I have come to the reluctant conclusion that the good old USA is going down for the count, and we will probably drag the rest of the world down with us. Now, taking the long run perspective, this is only to be expected. Empires come and, thankfully, empires go, and anyway, as Keynes said, in the long run we’ll all be dead. Still, there is much to be regretted in our coming demise. Some may call me an alarmist, and in any event, a decent respect for the opinion of mankind, etc., so I shall explain myself.

As the all wise Bard said:

There is a tide in the affairs of men
Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;
Omitted, all the voyage of their life
Is bound in shallows and in miseries.

We’ve missed a lot of flood tides in the past 40 years or so. Unfortunately, human affairs do not have the same regularity as the sea and the moon; we may never, in fact I would argue that we will never, get another flood tide like we got in 2008. It may not have been the highest tide, but it may have been our last chance to escape the shallows and miseries that now most surely await us. Unfortunately, the captain of our barque felt that a due respect for the opinions of the mutineers below decks required that he steer toward the shallows, so here we are.

To go from Shakespeare to Dylan, it doesn’t take a weatherman to know which way the wind blows or to see that a hard rain’s about to fall. (Two for the price of one on that one).

First, a few propositions on which I think we can agree.

People don’t change much and they usually pursue their own interests. Bankers will be bankers, Republicans will be Republicans, and Democrats, alas, will be Democrats. Knowing the actors, we can predict pretty much how they’ll strut and fret their hours on the stage. Or, as the immortal Willie S put it:

There is a history in all men’s lives,
Figuring the nature of the times deceased;
The which observed, a man may prophesy,
With a near aim, of the main chance of things
As yet not come to life, which in their seeds
And weak beginnings lie intreasured.
Such things become the hatch and brood of time

Basically he’s saying if you know the past, you can make a pretty good guess about the immediate future. I see doom, and I herewith present my case. To make my case the stronger, I will stack the deck against me. Let us assume that things go as well as we can reasonably expect in 2012, but we must further assume that the same actors, still being around, aren’t going to change the way they strut and fret.

So, best case: Obama wins. The House flips to a slight Democratic majority. The Senate, against all odds, retains a nominal Democratic majority, but then, we all know that the Republicans run the Senate unless there are only 36 of them, and there will be many more than that. This is best case reasonable scenario after all, not fantasyland, and lets not even talk about the Supreme Court, to which no non-right wing Obama appointee will ever be confirmed. In other words, the best we can hope for is that Obama serves a second term in a far weaker position than that in which he started his first, with the Republicans still controlling the Congress, since the Democrats would rather let the world explode than even think of damaging the non-existent collegiality of the Senate by barring the filibuster. Moreover, the Republicans have Obama’s number, and we can assume that he will be more than willing to “compromise” in the future as he has in the past. I.e., the Republicans will be imposing policy after 2012, with the added benefit that they will get to blame Obama and the Democrats when their policies fail.

So, given effective, and ever more detached from reality Republican dominance, what can we expect in the coming years.

Lets start with the most important issue of our time. Which issue is that, you may ask? Here’s a hint: the most important issue of any time is the one that the politicians talk about the least. This particlar issue is so important that politicians don’t talk about it at all. Now, think hard. Texas is baking, and they deserve it, with the situation apparently worse since Perry invoked the aid of his god, who apparently is pissed at even Texas for gay marriage.

Australia has finished baking and is now being deluged. Australia, being in many ways our twin, apparently thinks the solution is to kill climate scientists.
The Midwest was savaged by tornadoes, and we here in Connecticut can look forward to a day when we can get fresh squeezed OJ every morning by just stepping outside and picking a few big ones off our very own trees.
This goodly frame bids fair to soon become a sterile promontory, while this most excellent canopy, the air, does not just appear to be a foul and pestilent congregation of vapours, it most definitely is. In response, the paragon of animals, at least the examples of that breed that inhabit our Congress, have deified the incandescent bulb and, rather than even thinking about doing something about our impending doom, they are busying themselves trying to re-pollute the waters of America.

Obama, having done next to nothing about it in his first term, will do nothing about it in his second, and his fellow Democrats will follow his example, with the exception of an unhappy few. Frogs, apparently, do not actually allow themselves to be boiled alive if you turn the temperature up slowly, but it appears that humans do. This video from the Onion (only our humourists pay attention to these things) pretty much sums it up:


Nation’s Climatologists Exhibiting Strange Behavior (Season 1: Ep 5 on IFC)

But lets put the climate aside. After all, everyone else does. Even if we could add a refrigeration unit to the planet we’d still be doomed, if not to the everlasting fires of a superheated planet, at least to being a third world nation. Perhaps nothing better illustrates this than the deal presently being negotiated in Washington to solve the Republican manufactured “debt crisis”. If it’s a crisis at all, it’s a hostage crisis, since the Republicans have held the economy hostage, demanding ransom in order to take what has historically been a completely routine housekeeping measure. How have Obama and the Democrats responded to this hostage taking? By proposing to give the Republicans an even better hostage. The deal apparently is that if the Republicans and the Democrats can’t agree on a way to destroy the economy by November, the Republicans’ preferred plan will automatically become law. Literally no one in Washington is pointing out that the obsession with the deficit is an insane reaction to our current financial woes, except, of course, for lonely voices like Krugman, to whom nobody listens. Nor is anyone pointing out that the war on the poor and elderly further targets the victims of the bankers and rentiers that destroyed our way of life, while leaving those criminals in possession of their booty, along with an additional infusion picked from the pockets of those from whom both the Republicans and Democrats are demanding more “shared sacrifice”.

Thus, we march on, with one party more or less openly advocating for the destruction of the middle class and the creation of an oligarchy, while the other makes mildly protesting bleating noises. The corporate media, right wing radio, and their fellow travelers have brainwashed more than enough people in this country to vote against their own interests. Just to make sure, they’re also busy making it harder for people who might see through the bullshit to actually vote. Distraction and disinformation, spiced with racism (the ingredient that always seems to add a bit of kick) will assure that the distracted multitudes remain “pawns in their game”. Elections will simply be spectacles that give the fixed game a veneer of legitimacy. Real representative democracy cannot emerge from a delusional population.

If we can’t be number one, we can still believe we are, and our overlords will encourage that belief for as long as they’re able. That requires faith, and all evidence points to the further decline of reason in this nation. As always, religion will play a role, but the media may play a much bigger one. I was taken by Al Gore’s analogy in a recent edition of the Rolling Stone. His main concern was global warming, but the observation applies pretty much across the board. He relates how, when he was very young, he was mystified by professional wrestling. He wasn’t sure if it was real or not.

But the most unusual and in some ways most interesting character in these dramas was the referee: Whenever the bad guy committed a gross and obvious violation of the “rules” — such as they were — like using a metal folding chair to smack the good guy in the head, the referee always seemed to be preoccupied with one of the cornermen, or looking the other way. Yet whenever the good guy — after absorbing more abuse and unfairness than any reasonable person could tolerate — committed the slightest infraction, the referee was all over him. The answer to the question “Is it real?” seemed connected to the question of whether the referee was somehow confused about his role: Was he too an entertainer?

That is pretty much the role now being played by most of the news media in refereeing the current wrestling match over whether global warming is “real,” and whether it has any connection to the constant dumping of 90 million tons of heat-trapping emissions into the Earth’s thin shell of atmosphere every 24 hours.

Of course, the press follows the same pattern on most issues, and, quite predictably, the ref is always looking away when the corporate shills are smacking us on the head. Inconvenient truths are ignored as a matter of course. Truthiness rules.

Time is running out. The young people of this nation who have recently entered the job market are finding that there are no jobs waiting for them, in no small part because their anxious elders must work until they die or enter nursing homes. Meanwhile, the American educational system is being destroyed by a right wing that insists that the government can’t do anything right, and proves its proposition by making sure that the system lacks the resources to succeed at anything, including educating our youth, who continue to slip behind the rising generations in Europe and Asia. We no longer make things, and in a few short years, we will no longer be able to design things. Once we are completely useless the money pushers will abandon us for richer pastures, leaving behind the nation they have hollowed out.

We’re doomed.

Still, we can’t let all of this get us down, can we? Empires come and empires go. Ours, which seemed to bid fair to be the Rome to England’s Greece, has turned out to be a flash in the pan, with our Republic, such as it was, surviving for a far briefer time than the Roman variety and our empire collapsing while it is being built. Who knows, our Chinese overlords may not be any worse than those of the Galtian variety. Or, to quote a more modern English bard:

Some things in life are bad
They can really make you mad
Other things just make you swear and curse.
When you’re chewing on life’s gristle
Don’t grumble, give a whistle
And this’ll help things turn out for the best…

And…always look on the bright side of life…
Always look on the light side of life…

The cult of balance tips right

Paul Krugman continues his righteous jihad against centrism in today’s column, but I have a bone to pick. He says:

The cult of balance has played an important role in bringing us to the edge of disaster. For when reporting on political disputes always implies that both sides are to blame, there is no penalty for extremism. Voters won’t punish you for outrageous behavior if all they ever hear is that both sides are at fault.

I think Krugman would agree that there is a penalty for extremism, only it’s not applied in a balanced fashion, particularly by the cultists to whom he refers. Were this sort of obstruction to come from the left, the cult of balance would melt away. The left would certainly pay a price for extremism, for it pays a price today for demanding adherence to the status quo (which, when you think about it, should be the definition of centrism). For after all, on any issue with a discernible right-left dichotomy (and today, even acknowledgment of scientific truth is subject to a left-right dispute), the cult of balance requires that the left slide toward the middle. When the right makes demands, the cult requires that the middle slide toward the right, thereby establishing a new middle, to which the cultists immediately adjust and anoint the new normal, until the next round of demands.

We now have an unprecedented situation, unless, perhaps, the South made similar demands prior to the Civil War. The Republican party has put a gun to the nation’s head and demanded that we change the constitution or it will pull the trigger. It is well nigh impossible to overstate the outrageousness of this demand. Next week, it will have been digested by the cultists, who will start demanding that Democrats show some flexibility and meet the Republicans half way. So, Krugman is right that right wing extremism goes unpenalized, but don’t for a minute think the left gets a similar free pass.

Santorum: Ignorant or Liar? We report, you decide.

The article at this link is mainly devoted to documenting Newt Gingrich’s hypocrisy in the matter of supporting American workers while buying foreign made stuff. ABC is asking the Republican candidates to explain the foreign made t-shirts and other doodads that their campaigns are distributed. Newt just hemmed and hawed, but Rick Santorum ran with it:

“Made in the Dominican Republic,” he answered: “It’s tragic that so many products in this country are made outside of this country. And what we have to do is create a different dynamic. I think my policies are very clear that we have to go out and make setting up a business in this country productive.
Unfortunately under this administration and frankly previous administrations we have had had a unfriendly environment, particularly to the textile business.

You probably can find a T-shirt occasionally made in the United States but it’s harder and harder to do. That’s the tragedy. It’s a case in point of the tragedy of those kinds of jobs that should be in the United States but are not.”

Matter of fact, it takes about 3 seconds to find a t-shirt made in this country, as the Google demonstrates. These Republicans really should learn that it’s far easier these days to uncover a lie than it used to be. But then, since the media rarely calls them on their lies, maybe they just don’t care.

Working geezers = unemployed youth

Further proof at the link, if any were needed, that Lieberman’s proposal to raise the age of Medicare eligibility makes no sense in financial terms.

One thing that is rarely mentioned when these issues are discussed is the effect that raising eligibility ages has on the young. This is an issue, however, about which the young themselves, and their parents ( I can testify to this) are acutely aware. Many people who have reached the age of 65 are ready and willing to retire and make way for the younger generations. The problem is, they are often not able, and will be even less able under this proposal. Not able to survive on the early retirement benefits that social security pays to early retirees, and not able to pay the cost of private medical coverage. Being rational actors, they do what Joe wants them to do, slave away at their jobs so they can have insurance in case disaster strikes.

Meanwhile, young people entering the labor force are facing the worst job market in years, which will only be made worse by the Liebermandate that we must now work until we are 67 or dead. Rational people, such as Jamie Galbreath, have suggested that it makes more sense to reduce the age of eligibility for these programs. It would be, in effect, a massive stimulus program, getting money into the pockets of both those retiring and into the pockets of the underemployed or unemployed young, all of which, rather than being socked away into some hedge fund manager’s bank account, would be spent, thereby creating economic activity. See here for more on this issue.

On a related issue, David Kurtz at TPM makes the valid and what should be obvious point that all of the debt ceiling plans are being scored for how much money they would save, but none are being scored for how many jobs they would destroy.

Congress has consumed itself arguing and posturing about how to further destroy the economy, but hasn’t spent a minute talking about trying to do anything about the single most important economic problem we face. Since both sides have entered into the austerity debate with gusto, both bear responsibility (in varying degrees it’s true ) for the sorry place in which we find ourselves.

What’s good for Obama is not necessarily good for the Democrats

David Atkins, at Hullabaloo tries to make sense of Obama’s debt ceiling maneuvering, particularly his seeming eagerness, all of his own volition, unasked by the Republicans, to throw Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security under the bus. He notes speculation that Obama is intentionally ticking off his base so he can run as the reasonable centrist while counting on the fact that we have nowhere else to go, and concludes:

But I wouldn’t take that bet. As an activist on the ground, I can see firsthand how dispirited many of our core volunteers are at this stage. How long can the Democratic Party run headlong from its base even as Republicans eagerly rush to embrace theirs, before the liberal base gives up and goes home even if it means Michele Bachmann in the White House? It seems the President and his advisers are willing to test those limits. Time will tell if it blows up in their faces in 2012, or if they are vindicated.

It is always possible, of course, that the “centrists” Obama is reaching for might not be happy about the fact that he would like to doom them to an impoverished old age. It is also possible that a lot of them will, faced with two unpleasant alternatives, decide to sit the election out. The latter seems the most likely scenario to me, but I still think from Obama’s totally selfish point of view (which really appears to be his point of view) the strategy works, because, consistent with the fact he’s the luckiest guy on earth, his opponent bids fair to be someone so crazy that those who do show up will feel they have to vote against her or him. The real destruction occurs down ticket, because the mass in the middle cannot and, particularly given the nature of our media, never will understand that the Republican party is a monolithic structure, and a vote for the Republican candidate from their district is a vote for right wing extremism, no matter what he or she may say in order to get elected. In addition, the districts will be awash in third party money, so you will have a toxic mix of stupidity and propaganda that bodes no good for the hapless members of Congress that did not create this mess and did not propose, for example, cutting social security, but will be nonetheless attacked for being of the party whose president proposed doing just that. It is ironic, but irrelevant, that the attacks will come from people who will proceed to destroy social security should they win.

One conclusion we must be forced to draw: Obama considers being president more important than accomplishing anything, because he is rather deliberately setting the stage for another four years of paralyzed government. In fact, it will be worse than the last four, because the Republicans will have every reason to believe they’ll be able to walk into the White House in 2016, and they will resist handing Obama anything he wants, unless it would work to treat them like the children they are and he asks for the opposite of what he really wants. Regretfully, whoever wins the presidency in 2012, we can probably kiss any chance of getting the corporatist majority on the Supreme Court watered down a bit. There will be no openings until Obama’s next term (or Michelle’s), and when there is, the Republicans will either filibuster his every nomination, or he will nominate someone they have pre-approved. I speculate the latter. No more Sotomayors. Look for someone slightly to the left of Clarence Thomas, with Obama basking in the glow of bi-partisanship when his only slightly right wing nominee gets confirmed.

Still playing the share the blame game

The Times speaks with two tongues. On the editorial pages, where they are actually supposed to editorialize, they puts the blame for the “deadlock” just where it belongs-on the Republicans. But on the front page where they are supposed to stick to the facts, they editorialize. The headlines says “Both Sides Refuse to Budge” (print edition only), this despite the fact that the Democrats, or should I say Obama, have spent the last couple of months constantly budging.

Is it any wonder that the people of this country don’t have the slightest idea who to blame for their current ills, when the press insists on reporting that all of our problems are caused by intransigence on both sides, despite massive evidence to the contrary?

The Republicans know to expect this, because they have spent decades bashing the press for its alleged bias, and have now trained them to report any inanity the Republicans put out as one half of a he said/she said, with each sides argument, regardless of merit, being accorded equal respect. The process has now been extended to actions. In this case, each side is refusing to compromise, because one side is refusing to compromise. In a sense, I guess it’s true. The Republicans refuse to compromise and, after a series of compromise offers, the Democrats finally say enough. That makes them equal, in the eyes of the press if not in the eyes of a rational thinker.

Update: Paul Krugman agrees.