Great Cartoon.

I was with a friend last week that I went to grammar school with. That’s right, both of us permanently damaged by Our Lady of Sorrows school. How could you not be, with a name like that?
Anyway, I don’t remember how the subject came up, but he mentioned the Wildweeds, a Connecticut group that had at least a local hit with this song, . Now, I was faced with a choice here. I could post a version with no actual video, or this obvious bootleg taken last year in Northampton. Yes, these guys are still playing together. I figured I’d go with the video, and, truly, they don’t sound so bad after all these years.
Every day as I drive to work I pass the old Norwich State Hospital, and the amateur photographer in me lusts for the opportunity, sadly not to be had for a mere blogger such as me, to roam the grounds and buildings to take pictures. There is something compelling about the decay.
So it was with some interest that I noticed an exhibit of photography by Jennifer O’Malia and Chris Kiely at the Groton Public Library. Apparently, they were afforded access (or have rather brazenly exhibited the fruits of their urban explorations) and the results are compelling. These pictures of their pictures were taken with my iPhone, so the quality is not the best. If you live in the area, I’d recommend checking it out.


This was sent to me by some sort of publicist, presumably for Boston Magazine, but that’s alright. I’m happy to pass it on.
In some (hopefully) alternate universe, Romney gets elected. Unless he gets a 9/11 bump similar to Bush’s, my guess is that he’s the most despised man in the country within a year. Only the fact that the man has an ungodly amount of money, and has supporters (probably no friends) with similar amounts of money, can explain the fact that he has been nominated for President by a major political party.
I turned it off about 15 minutes before it was over. It’s no news that Romney lied about his “program”. The really irritating, though not unexpected thing, is how the debate was solely concerned with the obsessions of the Very Serious People in the Beltway: cutting benefits and the deficit. Unemployment is still high, but no questions about that. Naturally no questions about climate change. The entire debate, almost, was about irrelevancies or peripheral issues.
It could be a while before I further pollute the Internet. Civic duty tonight, debate tomorrow, and Drinking Liberally on Thursday. Speaking of Drinking Liberally, we’ve been trying to get the word out to all that we’re moving back to the Bulkeley House, 111 Bank Street in New London at 6:30 PM. If you like to drink, even a bit, or even if you don’t, come join us (the liberal part is not optional, however). Rumor has it we may have a special guest, but that’s not confirmed yet.
According to Andrew Ross Sorkin at the New York Times, hedge funds are sitting on about a trillion dollars in cash that they need to invest:
Some private equity firms have put the word out to Wall Street banks that they want to go “elephant hunting” — seeking big deals worth as much as $10 billion — and are willing to pay a special bounty for bringing them acquisition targets.
So, look, it’s nice to see that the .01% have more money than they know what to do with it, so I come not to decry that, but to decry what they intend to do with it if they can ever get it together to do something at all.
There was a time, wasn’t there, when people with money got together and did constructive things with it. They built railroads, for example, or factories. They invested in other people who had ideas for building other things. Sure, they were heartless Robber Barons, but at least when they were done we had railroads. Now, apparently, the thing to do is to buy already existing companies to get as much value out of them as you can. Whether that value is achieved by raping the company or making it grow is completely irrelevant. The last think they are looking to do is build or make things. After all, we have Kickstarter for that.
There is a solution, brothers and sisters. Let them be taxed, and let us spend that $1 trillion dollars on things people need, and, as Bob Dylan said in an entirely different context, “country’ll grow”.
I have usually enjoyed reading articles by New London’s own Joshua Green, but his column in this morning’s Globe made me wonder if he’s drunk that old inside the beltway Kool-Aid. I’m not taking issue with his main thesis that neither presidential campaign is being terribly specific about their prescriptions to cure the nation’s ills. Rather, it’s with Green’s formulation of those ills.
They would also agree that the election is not a referendum on President Obama but a choice — a “very dramatic choice,” as Mitt Romney told a crowd in Westerville, Ohio, on Wednesday — between two very different governing visions. That choice is all the more important because so many formidable problems await the next president: how to reduce the deficit, reform the tax code, and curb the growth of entitlement programs like Medicare and Social Security, to name just a few. With so much on the line, you might naturally want to know more about these competing visions. Here again the candidates would agree. They’d say, “We’ll get back to you.”
For the most part, this is a list of non-problems. If you heard a bank was offering to loan money to a business at a negative interest rate, would you conclude that the business has a debt problem? Right now people are basically paying the U.S. to hold their money, as it is paying, long term, lower interest than the rate of inflation. Long term we may have a deficit problem, but it’s caused by exploding health care costs, which themselves are caused by massive inefficiencies in our private health care system. Green doesn’t mention that fact; a fact commonly ignored by Beltway insiders. And where, other than in the Beltway, have there been demands for cutting either Social Security or Medicare? As to the former, it has no funding problem that raising the payroll tax cap wouldn’t fix. As to the latter, get health care costs under control, and the problem goes away. There really is no need to make people work until they die or have no health care until they’re 70.
Elsewhere Green speaks approvingly of the Simpson-Bowles commission recommendations. The Beltway refuses to recognize that the commission made no recommendation. What he refers to are the recommendations of Alan Simpson (the federal pension receiving ex-Senator who said Social Security recipients we’re all sucking at the public teat) and Morgan Stanley Director Erskine Bowles; recommendations that never earned the votes to become a commission report. Those recommendations are just what you’d expect from Simpson and Bowles: comfort for the comfortable and more affliction for the afflicted, but with a slightly more human face than the Ryan plan.
And note what’s missing from Green’s list of problems bedeviling the nation: any mention of unemployment or the bleak long term job prospects for so many members of the generation to which Green himself belongs. The list of more fundamental problems is a long one: global warming, hollowing out of our educational system; deterioration of our infrastructure, collapse of the manufacturing sector, “to name just a few”. You know, the problems that affect real Americans, both short term and long term, not the obsessions of the privileged and the Washington insiders. Here’s a quote from Robert Caro’s recent book on LBJ, in which he relates the advice Johnson was given by Eisenhower’s treasury secretary the day after Kennedy was shot:
Anderson told him that the surest way to restore confidence was to cut the budget and reduce the deficit.
My lord, same as it ever was. Why, that could be torn from today’s headlines, and, lamentably, from Green’s column. The advice was not followed, and the nation thrived, at least economically. These issues are, for the most part, used to distract from the real issues-those that truly affect the mass of people, and are used, as they currently are being used with a vengeance in Europe, to make the masses pay for the depredations visited upon them by the elites. They are formulations of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%. Remember also, that deficits don’t matter, and haven’t mattered, when Republicans are in office.
Joshua. Come home. Live in New London for a couple of years and regain your perspective.
UPDATE: Josh, if you won’t listen to me, listen to Paul.
We’ve been hearing a lot about voter fraud from the Republicans, but it is little noted nor long remembered that what few examples we have of the practice have been committed by Republican operatives. In person voter fraud is almost unknown, except when committed by little Republican criminals trying to prove it could be done. Now we learn that the Florida Republican Party, which has been intent on suppressing the vote in the name of suppressing non-existent fraud, has been engaged in fraud of its own. Who would have thunk?
TALLAHASSEE — A vendor fired by the Republican Party of Florida for submitting questionable voter registrations forms in Palm Beach County is also responsible for filing potentially hundreds of flawed applications in at least eight other counties, including Miami-Dade, election officials confirmed Friday.
Virginia-based Strategic Allied Consulting fell out of favor with Florida Republicans after Palm Beach County flagged 106 registration forms that had signature irregularities or incorrect information for voters already on file, such as new dates of birth and faulty Social Security numbers. Some of the forms in question attempted to change a voter’s address but violated state law by using business locations, such as the Port Everglades administration office, a gas station and a Land Rover dealership.
After problems in Palm Beach County emerged, Florida counties from Miami to the Panhandle reported similar irregularities with voter registration forms that all tracked back to the Republican Party of Florida.
(via Miami Herald)
Don’t for a moment think this firm did anything it was not supposed to do, except for one thing. It was not supposed to get caught.