Skip to content

Another fraud from Merrill and more hate from Hagee

File this one as miscellaneous fulminations. A couple of things caught my eye this morning as I used up some of my employer’s valuable time cruising the blogs.

First, if you thought that the subprime meltdown taught the big banks anything, disabuse yourself. Atrios relates that Merrill Lynch is using an accounting trick to artificially inflate its earnings. The fraud involved is so transparent that it’s almost breathtaking. They are booking their debt at its market value rather than the amount they owe:

Basically, the regulators said that these institutions should actually report what their assets are worth – market value – rather than some fantasy made up “model” number. So they said fine, but we want to do the same for our liabilities! So if Merill owes $100 million, but that debt is currently trading at $80 million because of fears that Merill will default on the debt, Merill gets to say “yay! We only owe $80 million.” Of course that isn’t true. They owe $100 million, and they have to either pay or default, but the fact that people are worried they’ll default means they get to pretend they owe less than they do.

Does this make any sense? Of course not.

More than that, they get to pick and choose which liabilities they get to account for this way.

Absolutely breathtaking. I’m no economist and I’m no accountant, but I know that this is a recipe for disaster.

On another subject altogether, my wife tells me that CNN is back to playing the Reverend Wright clip, but per usual we hear almost nothing about the “Reverend” Hagee. During our last Hagee episode we noted that Joe Lieberman is going to make nice with the good reverend, who he prefers not to judge by a single incredibly anti-Semitic outburst. Well, it appears that the holy man believes not only that Hitler was doing God’s work, but that the anti-Christ is, or will be…, you guessed it- a Jew. (via Digby) But not just any Jew. He will be a blaspheming Jew. But not just any blaspheming Jew. He will be a gay blaspheming Jew:

On March 16, 2003, on the eve of the United States’ invasion of Iraq, Pastor John Hagee took to the pulpit to warn of the coming Antichrist. In his sermon, “The Final Dictator,” Hagee described the Antichrist as a seductive figure with “fierce features.” He will be “a blasphemer and a homosexual,” the pastor announced. Then, Hagee boomed, “There’s a phrase in Scripture used solely to identify the Jewish people. It suggests that this man [the Antichrist] is at least going to be partially Jewish, as was Adolph Hitler, as was Karl Marx.”

This “fierce” gay Jew, according to Hagee, would “slaughter one-third of the Earth’s population” and “make Adolph Hitler look like a choirboy.”

I hereby predict that Joe will continue to make nice with this hatemonger. He will do it because he can’t bring himself to change his behavior at the behest of the hated “left wing bloggers”. I will always be proud of the small part I played in humiliating that loathsome little man and driving him away from the party he was soiling by his presence. The vote I cast for Ned Lamont at the State Convention was one of the high points of my political life.

Puzzled

Apparently, in the wake of her low turnout victory in Puerto Rico and the decision on Michigan and Florida, Hillary Clinton’s folks have adopted yet another spin point about how we should count to determine who is ahead in the popular vote count.

I have been puzzled about this line of attack for some time, because it presumes ignorance on the part of those to whom it is addressed. Let’s assume for the moment that being the popular vote winner means something in the overall context of this race. The argument, for instance, that the Michigan votes cast for Hillary should count, and that Obama should get none from that state, might make a fine spin point, but only if it is addressed to people who have not been paying attention. But at the moment there is only one audience that counts: the uncommitted delegates. Almost by definition, they are people who have been paying attention and know that Clinton’s argument is total bullshit. Not an insignificant number of them must be ticked that she is trying to change the rules, that she and her people supported, now that things are not going her way. It is hard to believe that the “popular vote” lead (which Obama still holds, using any rational measure) means much to these people, who have a more sophisticated understanding of the political scene than the average Clinton voter who worries about flag pins or bowling scores. Even if it ordinarily would, they are acutely aware that Clinton is spinning the numbers in an unconscionable way.

Maybe I’m missing something, but I don’t see the point. You can’t spin people who know the truth.

On a related note, don’t be fooled by the media’s attempt to make you believe that the Democratic party is totally fractured by the Michigan/Florida outcome yesterday. The folks who were demanding that the DNC break the rules for Hillary’s benefit were promising 10,000 demonstrators, they produced a few dozen, including one whack job who spewed some racist invective. Hillary is over. One must wonder whether some of her delegates from the early primary states have been turned off by her tactics in the late going. In any event, she doesn’t have the votes and it seems pretty clear that the party leaders are, at this point, ready to step in and tell her to step aside.

Pictures from the Garden

My wife tentatively agreed to do weekly gardening posts, but she chickened out, so we agreed that we would put up pictures on weekends to show the gardens progress. The thumbnails below are part of a new WordPress feature called “gallery”. If you click on any image you get an enlargement to about 640 pixels wide. If you click on that enlargement, you should get one that is full size.

I’m still working out the kinks. The last three pictures depict some birds to which I was able to get relatively close. The first two are pictures of a brown thrasher. My wife preferred the first picture, while I liked the second, so I decided to put them both up. If there are any bird fanciers who can identify the last picture I’d be interested in hearing from them. It was sitting on a thin branch that is extending out from a rose bush, though I think it’s some sort of vine. When I first saw it I wasn’t even sure it was a bird. It couldn’t have been more than an inch and a half long. I took the picture with a telephoto lens, fully extended, and cropped the resulting picture real close. I think it may be some sort of hummingbird.

UPDATE: I am reliably informed that the mystery bird is a ruby throated hummingbird.

Unlawful free speech

You have the right to free
Speech as long as you’re not
Dumb enough to actually try it.

The Clash

This ( Jailed for Protesting Gitmo: 34 Convicted for Demonstrations Outside Supreme Court) was passed on to me by a friend this morning. According to the article the 34 were convicted of “unlawful free speech”. I was unable to independently verify that there is a crime in the DC or Federal code called “unlawful free speech”. I still find it hard to believe, if only because you would think any legislator or prosecutor would steer away from such an Orwellian statute name. Whatever the charge, this is yet another example of the not so slow erosion of our basic rights in this country. It has a local angle since at least one of the protestors is from New London, and another, Arthur Laffin, has a history of civil disobedience in this area. I don’t know if he still lives around here. Here’s the gist:

Thirty-four Americans arrested at the Supreme Court on January 11, 2008 were found guilty after a three-day trial which began on Tuesday, May 27th in D.C. Superior Court. The defendants represented themselves, mounting a spirited defense of their First Amendment rights to protest the gross injustice of abuse and indefinite detention of men at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay.

Charged with “unlawful free speech,” the defendants were part of a larger group that appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court on January 11—the day marking six years of indefinite detention and torture at Guantanamo. “I knelt and prayed on the steps of the Supreme Court wearing an orange jumpsuit and black hood to be present for Fnu Fazaldad,” said Tim Nolan, a nurse practitioner from Asheville, NC who provides health care for people with HIV.

Defendants and witnesses argued that they did not expect to be arrested at the Supreme Court, “an internationally known temple to free speech.” Ashley Casale, a student at Wellesley College in Massachusetts, told the court, “I am 19– the youngest person in this courtroom—and I come on behalf of all the prisoners at Guantanamo who were younger than I am now when they were detained. According to the U.S. Constitution we have a right to petition the government for a redress of grievances and Guantanamo Bay prison is beyond grievous.”

Historian Michael S. Foley, a professor at the City University of New York, teaches the U.S. Constitution to undergraduates. He testified that if “you told me that the defendants would be arrested for ‘unlawful free speech’ just twenty feet from where the Justices decide First Amendment cases, I’d say you were ‘crazy.’”

In the defendants’ first closing statement, Father Emmett Jarrett, an Episcopalian priest from New London, CT, told Judge Wendell Gardner, “we came to the Supreme Court on January 11th with one intention– to put dramatically before the court—both the Supreme Court and the higher court of public opinion and conscience—the plight of the men and boys detained at Guantanamo. We came to the Supreme Court on January 11th not to protest but to present a letter to the justices, asking them to act on behalf of detainees imprisoned at Guantanamo, to restore their human and legal rights—to give a voice to the voiceless.”

Arthur Laffin followed with a closing statement that touched on both legal and moral arguments for the defendants’ innocence, and pleaded with the court and the prosecution to join the defendants in “ending the horrors.” “The Nuremberg Accords,” he asserted, “state that individuals have a duty to prevent crimes against humanity and that if people don’t act to prevent such crimes, they are actually complicit in them.” He then concluded, “We, who are on trial today, along with many friends, refuse to be complicit in these crimes.”

Even 10 years ago my money would have been on this verdict being overturned some day, but I don’t see it happening now. Perhaps the protestors should have tried an equal protection claim, since anti-abortion protestors routinely demonstrate at the Supreme Court. Sorry, I forgot, nowadays the Equal Protection Clause only protects people whose last name is Bush. The future of the Bill of Rights (other than the 2nd Amendment, which will now be distorted to make us all unsafe) is one of those important issues that will be decided by the next election, about which we will hear almost nothing.

Friday Night Music-Everly Brothers

If I have any obsessive compulsive readers, they may have noticed that there was no Friday night music two weeks ago (or was it three?). I had prepared this post, but apparently never hit the publish button, so it remained, unbeknownst to me, in among the drafts, those orphaned pieces of writing that didn’t make the cut even considering the low standards on this blog.

I meant to post these Everly Brothers videos, in line with a series of videos from the Fifties. So without further ado, what follows is the text of the original post which started out by asking:

Who’s the dork who introduces them on this one? What an …hole. Bye Bye Love:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUoN50lkRi4[/youtube]

And a twofer, All I Have to Do is Dream and Cathy’s Clown:

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKn6h2x5IcY[/youtube]

Missing plug

Yesterday I posted a video of David Sirota’s talk at the R.J. Julia Bookstore, and today like magic I have a comment from the store’s marketing manager. While I’m sure his comment was posted for strictly disinterested reasons, it did remind me that I should have put in a plug for R.J. Julia’s, which is a great little independent bookstore. If you’re a book fan like me, you probably agree that, whatever their convenience, the Borders and Waldenbooks can’t compare to a good independent bookstore. There are some bookstores where you can just tell that the owner is sympatico with you on some level, and that the person running the store feels that books are more than mere commodities. (It also helps if the left wing books are prominently displayed and the latest Ann Coulter is either nowhere to be found, or tucked away in obscurity) Here in Groton we have a pretty good bookstore in Mystic (Bank Square Books), but I have to give R.J. Julia’s the prize, at least between the two. Besides that, downtown Madison is a pretty neat place, a bit reminiscent of downtown Mystic before it went completely tourist, which reminds me, speaking of bookstores, of the late, lamented Other Bookstore, which graced downtown Mystic in the Seventies.

In any event, and before I get completely off track, if you get a chance check out R.J. Julia’s. It’s worth a trip, and besides books there’s good eating and ice cream in Madison.

GOSA does it again

The Groton Open Spaces Association has succeeded in beating yet another developer. It recently completed the purchase of the Merritt Property at the top of Fort Hill, between Fishtown Road and Route 1. Thanks to the efforts of GOSA, huge chunks of Fort Hill have been saved from being McMansionized. In addition to saving so much of Fort Hill, it was GOSA, or its predecessors, who saved the Haley Farm for all of us.

No other group in Groton has had such a profound influence on the quality of life in this Town. As with all such endeavors there’s a core group of folks who have done most of the heavy lifting. Some of them have been at it since the 60s, when Haley Farm was saved. Their achievements are truly remarkable. It’s doubtful that any similar group in the state has accomplished so much.

Sirota and Lamont in Madison

My wife and I were in Madison last night, at R.J. Julia’s Bookstore, to see and David Sirota talk about this new book, The Uprising. Ned Lamont introduced him, after which he spoke for about 15 minutes. Following that, there was a Q&A session. I had my little video camera with me, and managed to get decent video of Ned’s introduction, and Sirota’s talk, which I had to split in two to comply with youtube’s rules. Spazeboy was there, filming the whole thing for CCAG, which sponsored the event, and he expects to have a full video up on their site. Until then, maybe I have a monopoly.

Here’s Ned’s introduction:

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=kiAPKJ-xLkw[/youtube]

Followed by David, in two parts:

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=T42xvNjQpSE[/youtube]

[youtube]http://youtube.com/watch?v=bAa4975B4K4[/youtube]

Speaking of the tube, I am going to be taping with Sheila Horvitz again for her program on the Norwich cable system. I am a late fill in for another, probably more interesting guest, who couldn’t make it. I’m not sure when it will actually be televised, but thankfully it’s only shown on the Norwich system.

Hold that act of contrition

That’s more like it. John McCain says that, after all, the telecoms don’t need to say a sincere act of contrition, or even parrot the more common corporate insincere statement of contrition, before getting absolution for their sins:

McCain’s campaign is now backtracking from the apology requirement. In a response to the Wired interview, the McCain campaign said McCain has “shown a commitment to winning the battle against Islamic fundamentalists,” arguing that the lawyer “incorrectly represented” McCain’s position:

John McCain believes that as part of this battle, companies who assist the government in good faith should not be punished, but he also believes that Congress must put forth clear guidelines for requesting the participation of private companies, provide proper Congressional oversight of any such participation and protect all Americans privacy. After careful and deliberate consideration, fact-finding, and exploration of options, John McCain has continued to support renewal of the Foreign Intelligence and Surveillance Act. The granting of retroactive immunity supports the continuing efforts of participating companies yet should be done with explicit statements that this is not a blessing for future activities.

Consequences for intentional lawbreaking, like taxes, are for the little people.

Hagee: Hitler was doing God’s work; Joe: Hagee is doing God’s work

Last week John McCain saw fit to denounce John Hagee, the anti-everyone preacher whose endorsement he so eagerly courted a few months ago. You probably read the series of front page articles in the Times about Hagee’s hate filled message and the fact that McCain’s campaign was foundering due to the all Hagee all the time talk on the cable news. Oh, wait, sorry, those articles were about Obama and Wright. But you probably did see the very short article on Hagee stuck somewhere in the bowels of your favorite newspaper, or you may have heard fleeting mention of the controversy on the self same cable news. McCain had only a moderate amount of problems with Hagee for being anti-Catholic, anti-gay, and anti-black (views from which he disassociated himself, while accepting yet another free media pass) but even McCain had to give way when it turned out that Hagee gave a sermon in which he said Hitler was doing God’s work when he ordered the holocaust. You see, some of those pesky Jews were just too slow about going back to Israel, where they were needed to start a Jewish state and set the stage for the rapture (in which all of the self same Jews will be killed for the heathens they are.) Hitler, according to Hagee, was giving them a little nudge by making it clear to them that they weren’t welcome in Europe. Make’s you wonder, doesn’t it, whether he thinks we should get a Hitler of our own to clear out our Jews and shove them toward Palestine.

Hagee isn’t losing any sleep over McCain’s rejection, because he still has Joe Lieberman at his side. Yes, that’s the Joe Lieberman who condemns people like us for being intolerant of people like Joe. (Okay, it’s true, we are).

Senator Joseph Lieberman is scheduled to headline Pastor John Hagee’s 2008 Christians United For Israel Washington-Israel Summit this July 22. In accepting Hagee’s invitation, Lieberman became the most senior elected representative confirmed to appear at the annual gala. Last year, when Lieberman spoke at Hagee’s summit, he compared the Texas televangelist to the biblical prophet Moses, dubbing him “an Ish Elochim,” or “a man of God.” Unless he rescinds his pledge to appear at this year’s summit, Lieberman can be expected to deliver another soul-stirring tribute.

Over at Sadly, No , (via Kos ), they ask:

We’ve heard a lot of nonsense in recent years that any left-wing Jew who doesn’t unconditionally back the Israeli government’s actions is “self-loathing.” This lazy smear has been applied to many people over the past few years, including Steven Spielberg, Avraham Burg, George Soros, Noam Chomsky, Paul Krugman, and countless, countless others who have refused to wave the Likud pom-poms.

But ask yourselves: What behavior could possibly be more self-loathing than when someone deems that political convenience is worth tolerating the mad notion that one of history’s greatest crimes against humanity was all part of ‘God’s plan?’ Isn’t it time that we take a long look at what it actually means to be a ’self-loathing Jew?’

In defense of Lieberman, he has every right to be self loathing. Why should he feel any differently about himself than everyone else?

We can only hope that the press of the state into which Lieberman never steps (that would be Connecticut) might pick up on this and, you know, tell people about it. When it comes to Lieberman we too often find that what goes on outside of Connecticut, stays outside of Connecticut, leaving Joe’s putative constituents ignorant of the fact that he is bringing disgrace on our once proud state.