Skip to content

Only in America

This country is going certifiably insane:

Under direction from Gov. Scott Walker (R), Wisconsin’s GOP-led legislature is drawing up rules to allow the public to carry guns into the state Capitol. As the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reports, the Assembly plans to allow guns onto the Assembly floor and into the viewing galleries and are meeting today to set the rules. Those toting guns into the galleries would still have to follow existing rules, “including one that bars the use of still cameras and video cameras.”

U.S. government to legalize lying

It’s always okay if done in the name of the security state:

The Justice Department is proposing new Freedom of Information Act rules allowing the government to inform the public that records do not exist even if they do.

The judiciary has rolled over and played dead while the government has kept its crimes secret in the name of security. This just makes it official. The rule of law is for the little people.

Just plain weird

In case you haven’t seen it. One of the most bizarre political ads ever made.

Where do these people come from? Do you ever meet them in real life? How is it that they rule the world? Block is a creature of the Kochs, by the way.

UPDATE: Colbert’s take:

Documenting the atrocities, an exercise in futility

There’s a blog out there, whose name escapes me, which had a regular feature asking that readers document the atrocities committed weekly on the Sunday talk Shows. I’ve noted before that Steve Benen spends a lot of time doing exactly that on his blog at the Washington Monthly. He does it very well, as here, where he makes the point that Mitch McConnell becomes intellectually incoherent when presented with evidence that the GOP talking points of the day are not supported by the facts.

For my own part, I have come to the sad realization that documenting the atrocities is more or less an exercise in futility. Does it get through to anyone who doesn’t already realize that we are governed by liars and thieves? Does the media, on whom these lies and distortions are regularly vomited, even care?

Contrary to Benen’s charitable view, it’s quite clear that McConnell clearly understood the question he was asked, and replied with a GOP talking point because that’s what they do, and because it always works. Here’s the exchange Benen quotes:

CROWLEY: Let me show you, because I know that Republicans have always said and continue to say that regulation is stifling business, stifling jobs growth. But there are a couple of figures out there that we found from the Bureau of Labor and Statistics, one of them is on the reasons for initial unemployment claims, this is for the first and the second quarter.

Government regulation a little over 2,000 claims for unemployment were blamed on government regulation. Insufficient demand, 55,000. The National Federation of Independent Businesses did a survey. They asked small business owners, the very people you’re talking to, what is the single most important problem, they said poor sales. Government regulation was at 18 percent, taxes was at 18 percent, poor sales, 28 percent of people said that’s what the problem is.

So are you focusing on the wrong problem?

MCCONNELL: Well, you know why people aren’t buying. They’re unemployed. I mean, the private sector is not going to get going here until the government gets its foot off the throat and lets people who know how to create jobs and grow businesses do that.

Look, Candy, all of these people are not making this up. I don’t think people who are running companies are making it up. They realize what is making it difficult for them to grow and expand.

New health care mandates, the financial, the lenders, the new Dodd-Frank bill, crawling all over everybody, not big banks but small banks, all over my state, making it more and more difficult for them to lend.

Spouting talking points didn’t in this instance, as it usually does, because Candy Crowley, being the bulldog that she is, followed up and refused to let go until she got a straight answer and exposed the many and sundry lies in McConnell’s answer.

No, I kid, this is what she really did:

CROWLEY: Let me pick up where we left off right after a quick break. We’ll be right back with you.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

CROWLEY: Senator, I want to move us on to some politics here. I had a discussion with Senator Joe Biden earlier in the week, and he had something to say about Republicans I want you to listen to.

So Candy picked up where she left off, by changing the subject entirely Had she actually exposed his lies, he might not have come back on the show, and she can’t have that. Not that she’s interested in real journalism anyway. She’s with the 1%, like all the other talking heads, and she’s quite comfortable letting the GOP have its way.

NPR channels Joe McCarthy

This is why I don’t get all excited when I get fundraising emails telling me that the Republicans are threatening to destroy NPR. They already have.

Friday night music

Continuing with the topical stuff, and in further tribute to the occupiers throughout the land, one song that I should have thought of earlier and one that’s not quite on point, but is close enough. Both suggested, in one way or another from things I read wandering the web. The first in an opinion piece (can’t remember where it was, so no link), which contained an allusion, the second from Hullabaloo, here, from which I’m basically stealing the video.

So far as I can see there is no Dylan version of this song on YouTube, so I chose this Springsteen version.

I don’t recall the Beatles being on the Smothers Brothers show, but apparently they were, and this appears to be live, as John adds the phrase “and in”, which I don’t believe was on the 45 version.

A Plug

Friend, reader and oft times Liberal Drinker Audrey Heard art will be exhibiting at the Tsetse Gallery in New London starting next week. My wife and I have several of Audrey’s pieces. From the looks of the poster below, it looks like Audrey has moved in a slightly different direction. We have several still lifes, but the piece below looks more abstract than anything I’ve seen before, but then, what do I know about art?

If you’re in the area, stop by.

Raising (the subject of) Cain

Okay, I’ve largely or completely (I think) avoided even mentioning Herman Cain, but I can’t help myself now. It’s been a temptation, but I’ve resisted it, largely as penance for too frequent posting about Sarah and Michelle. It’s not that I put Herman in their league, by the way. If anything, on the continuum of crazy, he’s actually sort of toward the sane side of things. That’s relative to them, of course, which still puts him well within the borders of the Land of the Insane.

I feel I can break my self imposed silence, being as Herman is enjoying his day in the Sun as the leading not-Romney in the race. He’s the frontrunner, so he’s fair game, easy mark though he is.

I direct your attention to the latest: an actual analysis of Cain’s tax “plan”. The article to which I’ve linked above has a bar graph showing the amounts by which taxes would increase for various income brackets below $200,000.00. After that, of course, taxes decrease, as is only right and just. Matter of fact, they literally plunge.

I would submit that the graph is not telling the entire story, so I have rejiggered it. I’ve used the same figures, but instead of showing the amount of tax increase, I’ve shown the increase as a percentage of total income. This comes a bit closer to showing the true impact of the plan on the people in the various brackets. It doesn’t actually do that, of course, because a 10% hit on a total income of $10,000.00 is far more devastating than a like percentage hit on an income of $100,000.00, but it comes closer to showing the impact than merely showing absolute dollar amounts.

As you can see, Cain’s program is almost absolutely perfect given today’s prevailing memes. It doesn’t quite get there, because, the desperately poor are not hit quite as hard as the poor and nearly poor. But, if we adjust for the consideration I mentioned above, then I think that this graph proves to the discerning mind that the desperately poor are, in fact, taking the biggest hit of all. What more could you ask?

So Cain has a winner here. And make no mistake about it, if not-Romney happens to win, the not-Romney may be Cain by default, and the 9-9-9 plan may make it into law. There’s nothing the Republicans would like better than following a token black who wants them to screw the poor and middle class, with the added frisson of their actions having a disparate, negative impact on minorities.

But not everything is looking up for Cain, at least to all appearances. A new Super Pac has come into being called Americans For Herman Cain. Talking Points says the name may be illegal, as a Super Pac is not supposed to mention the candidate in the name. But there’s more to this than meets the eye, and it shows that there’s a downside to Citizens United even for the Republicans. Americans For Herman Cain is the brainchild of one Jordan Gehrke, who has made something of a living out of draining funds from the wallets of conservatives. He specialized, previously, in running direct mail campaigns for Republican long shots, preying on gullible right wingers throughout the land. The Republicans in question got a small sliver of the money, with Gehrke and affiliated scamsters pocketing the rest. His current scam seems clear. Start a Super Pac supporting some candidate, with a name as misleading as you can manage, implying that you are working on behalf of said candidate. Use a tiny percentage of the money to propagandize for the candidate, and pocket the rest. Though the article at Talking Points argues that the name of the Pac is illegal, my money’s on the courts holding that regulating the name would deny the organization’s free speech rights. In any event, probably no one will actually try to stop Gehrke, who will promptly soak up millions that might otherwise have actually gone to Cain. This, of course, will drain money away from the Cain campaign, but, given the distinct possibility that Cain isn’t really interested in winning, he may be in on the scam. In any event, it’s an interesting twist on Sarah’s scam of enriching herself through a self-promoting Pac.

Harry Belafonte on Colbert

Nice segment with Harry Belafonte on Colbert:

Reading Sarah’s tea leaves

Sarah Palin has changed her facebook designation from Republican to Conservative, and her fans are all a-twitter.

One long-time blogger and Palin supporter wrote: ‘I suppose one could draw a multitude of conclusions regarding this status change.

‘I know that I certainly have. You can be certain that any move Sarah Palin makes has been well thought out and is with purpose.

I was going to make a snarky comment about that last sentence, given that so much of what Palin says is, if thought out at all, most poorly thought out. But what she does? I must concede that she appears to put a lot of thought into her moves. Not all have succeeded, but by and large she’s cashed in handsomely on her notoriety, and if we want to glean the meaning of this act, we must look and see where the money might be in this change of political hats.

I would like to think, to echo Jesse Jackson, that this helps us “keep hope alive”. My hopes, though I think they’re likely to be dashed, is that this is Sarah subtly signaling a third party run. There would be lots of cash in that. But I’m dubious. My guess is that she’s positioning herself to become the spokesmodel for all those folks out there who are fed up with today’s liberal Republican party, and are looking for pure fascism conservatism. You just can’t please some people, but maybe Sarah’s going to try. Unfortunately for Sarah I think she’s past her sell-by date, though she’s still great fun for those of us on this side of the divide.