Skip to content

Lies and lying liars

Sunday, March 5, 2023

Over at Hullabaloo we read that Fox’s right wing competitors have utterly failed to cover the Dominion lawsuit and the unsurprising revelations that Fox’s on air personalities were knowingly lying to their viewers about the 2020 election, among a host of other things. Digby concludes:

This just shows how homogenous the right wing media sphere is. Even Fox’s competitors won’t show their audience what Fox did. And the reason Fox did what they did was because the audience was leaving them and going to those very competitors! I guess the right is just now all about the grift and actual competition and capitalism are no longer relevant. Amazing.

I’m sure Digby is also aware of the underlying reason why Fox’s competitors have remained silent. If they were to cover the story, they would have to turn somersaults to avoid letting on that the lies the Fox people were telling are the same lies they themselves are endorsing. After all, they are knowingly lying to their viewers as well, and the last thing they want to do is acknowledge in any way, shape or form that the election was not stolen since it follows as the night the day that they too have been lying to their viewers. Not that their viewers would conclude that they had been lied to in the past; they would instead conclude that they were being lied to in the present, and they would go elsewhere as they did to Fox when it made the mistake of calling Arizona for Biden.

Filed in Lies and Lying Liars, Media | | Comments (0)

An announcement

Saturday, March 4, 2023

I don’t think I’ve written much about Ron DeSantis, the fascist who is governor of Florida, but I intend to do so a lot hereafter, should the state of Florida actually pass the proposed bill that would require any paid blogger to register with the state of Florida if he or she writes about DeSantis.

Now, the reader may ask: since when do you get paid to write this two-bit blog? Well, the fact is that years ago I was contacted by an organization called Newstex that actually does pay bloggers as it passes on their content in some form or manner, and I signed on, because why not? Payments are based on readership, and this two bit blog has often earned four bits, or even more in the course of a year. I get emails from them periodically telling me what I’ve earned, and that someday, when it amounts to enough, they’ll actually pay me. And they have, once or twice. So I am paid, somewhat, and I feel it’s my duty to write about the Florida Fascist, without, of course, registering with the Reich of Florida.

In another time period, not so long ago, the proposed law would have been laughed out of court as blatantly unconstitutional, but that was then and this is now, so you never know.

Filed in Announcements | | Comments (0)

Both Siderism to the 10th power

Monday, February 27, 2023

Any regular readers of this blog, should they exist, know that I’m a big fan of Driftglass, who has spent years document bothsiderism and the attendant atrocities. It’s a shame that he isn’t aware of today’s New London Day, which has once again bent over backward to so far to be “fair and balanced” it has put its head up its ass, and not for the first time, though even Driftglass might have trouble doing justice to the latest Day atrocity.

If you have today’s rag, take a look at the editorial page (on which there are, by the way, no editorials). There are two political cartoons.

The first consists of three panels, the first two of which show Mark Twain saying “There are lies.. Damned Lies, and…” followed by a panel with a Greek column on which rests a stone with the words “Fox News” on it.

So far, so good. Recent revelations have proven what everyone with a brain has known for years: Fox trades in lies and half truths.

But the Day cannot stop there. After all, Both Sides (!) must be represented on its pages, even if by so doing the Day itself implicitly endorses lies and damned lies.

The second cartoon, the product of a right wing cartoonist that the Day uses for “balance” consists of an image of a television newscaster with the words “Conservative News” behind him. He is muzzled, his desk is swathed with ribbons reading “Speech Police Line, Do not cross”, and a document with the word “Blacklist” is stuck on the wall behind him.

Yes, the Day felt it necessary to counter truth with a lie in order to present both sides. The right wing cartoon is a classic Republican lie, accusing the other side of what they themselves are doing, for we can presume that the cartoon newsman from “Conservative News” would be fine with the book banning going on in red states, where only sanitized versions of American history may be propagandized and where teachers are being placed in criminal jeopardy should they dare to teach real history. One would be hard pressed to find an example of a politician on the left attempting to use the power of the state to prevent the free expression of ideas or historical truth.

Since this is an exercise in bothsiderism, could it be that we are to infer that the cartoonist responsible for this abomination believes Fox is being unfairly muzzled because it is being sued for consistently lying about Dominion voting machines? The Free speech clause has never, to date, been understood to exempt one who libels or slanders another from suffering the consequences in a civil action, but that’s something the right fails to understand, unless they’re bewailing their own alleged inability to sue someone on the left for slander. See, e.g., Trump mewling about changing libel laws so he can sue people for what they say about him, while he uses every trick in the book to duck responsibility for his own repeated libels and slanders. It is true that liberals have largely escaped being sued for libel, but that’s mostly because facts tend to have a liberal bias, so they don’t have to lie.

I have no hope that the Day will ever change. It used to be a good paper, but it lost its way when it caved to a bunch of right wing letter writers that accused it of liberal bias so it proceeded to make sure that the right had more exposure on its editorial page than anyone approaching the left, going so far as to give column space to a local right wing radio bloviator. No left wing local bloviator has ever been given similar space. After all, part of the both sides religion requires that one tilt to the right in order to prove that one treats both sides fairly. Do they contradict themselves? As Walt Whitman would say, “very well, the contradict themselves”. But that’s only to be expected.

Filed in Media, Rants | | Comments (0)

Book report

Friday, February 17, 2023

I’m currently reading Myth America, a collection of essays edited by Kevin Kruse and Julian Zelizer. I am informed by the cover image on my e-reader that it is or was a New York Times bestseller, a fact of which I was unaware, in part because we can no longer get home delivery of the Times here in the wilds of Eastern Connecticut. I ran across the book by chance and decided to get it, as both my wife and I follow Kruse, she on Twitter and I on Mastodon, and we usually agree with what he has to say.

As the name implies, the book seeks to deflate a number of myths about this country, primarily by eschewing the both siderism so prevalent in our media today, except for the right wing media, of course, which exempts itself from what it demands of others. The book has a clear leftward slant, but that’s because facts have a liberal bias.

Needless to say, if one is relatively well informed, a reader is likely to already know that the myths in question are just that. It is, for example, self evident to almost anyone that the right wing trope that not only should the “Free Market” be left to develop on its own without governmental interference, but that doing so will solve all our problems, is an absurd notion. One need only imagine what the state of our rivers would be today had the government not stepped in to stop the free enterprisers from dumping anything they like into them. Why, the Cuyahoga River, in the immortal words of Randy Newman, would still “burn on”. The list could go on into infinity.

Still, it’s good to have the rebuttals to these myths presented in well documented form. Some of the essays delve into matters that are not so familiar, and are well worth knowing about, such as that by Kathleen Belew that documents the history and tactics of the right wing militia movement in this country. While I’ve been aware of these groups, I was unaware of the manner in which they organize and the extent to which what appear to be “lone wolf” actions are often actions taken consistent with goals spread through the network the militias use to coordinate their actions while making it quite hard to legally prove that coordination.

The book is well worth a read.

Filed in Book reports | | Comments (0)

An interesting case

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

I’m just sort of passing this along. It’s a fascinating case covered at this post on Above the Law.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court is about to decide whether a convicted defendant who is black is entitled to a new trial because his public defender was a rabid racist.

The issue under debate is whether a public defender’s bigotry, evidenced by 20 racist social media posts that he made while representing his client, constitutes a conflict of interest. That would grant the defendant an automatic new trial, without having to pinpoint specific ways in which his attorney’s representation impacted his case.

Based on the questions from the judges that the post quotes, I’m guessing the court is going to do the right thing, though it may open a colossal can of worms. The lawyer in question was a public defender who represented more than 6,000 defendants in his career. Given certain realities, which of course by no means demonstrate systemic racism in our society (we are not Woke!) it is a sure thing that a hefty percentage of those defendants were black. If the court rules in favor of the individual in question, it would seem to follow as the night the day that all those other defendants deserve new trials as well.

Personally, I can see no way for the court to logically rule against the guy, and given that we’re talking about Massachusetts, I’d bet he will win. I’m sure, however, that courts in other states (and the feds, of course) will find a way to rule the other way should the issue come their way.

Filed in Lawyer stuff | | Comments (0)

A brief Super Bowl day rant having nothing to do with the Super Bowl

Sunday, February 12, 2023

There are a lot of things to rant about these days, and this rant is likely on one of the least important topics, but it’s still indicative of something that is seriously wrong with our media ecosystem.

There are certain politicians who should be nonentities, yet they tend to attract about 90% of the media attention. I refer to people like Matt Gaetz, Marjorie Taylor Greene, et. al. All they have to do to get attention is say something absolutely absurd. Meanwhile, serious legislators, like our own Joe Courtney, go about doing their jobs and go unnoticed.

If the media reported on the nonentities, but treated them as they deserved, that would be one thing. But they get to bloviate endlessly while those who seriously want to get things done are largely ignored. What, for example, has Majorie Taylor Greene ever actually accomplished, other than reducing Kevin McCarthy to a bowl of quivering jelly? Has she ever done anything of use to her consitituents, never mind the country? She’s in it for the attention, and she gets all she wants.

The more the system rewards such people, the more such people we will get. We have a tenuous hold on our democracy at the moment, and the more such politicians we get the more tenuous that hold will become.

End of rant.

Filed in Rants | | Comments (0)

Friday Night Music, Giddens and Woody

Friday, February 10, 2023

My wife and I don’t disagree on much, but for reasons I can’t fathom she isn’t a folk music fan, so I listen to Folk Alley when she’s not around.

So a few days ago, my wife being elsewhere, I was listening to a song and thought I recognized the voice of the truly great Rhiannon Giddens, and was a bit intrigued by the line “All You Fascists Bound to Lose”. I did a search and it was, indeed, Giddens with the Resistance Revival Chorus singing a song Woody Guthrie penned when the prospects for the Fascists, at least in this country, were indeed a bit dimmer than today.

Here’s the Giddens version:

And, for your listening pleasure, here’s Woody, from back in the day.

We can only hope that Woody was right.

As a side note, it’s been many a moon since I put up music, something that used to be a regular Friday night feature on this blog. Maybe I’ll start again.

Filed in Music | | Comments (0)

Today’s rant

Tuesday, February 7, 2023

As this is my blog I have every right to gripe endlessly about certain subjects. Today I’m combining one old gripe with one I don’t think I’ve ever bloviated about before.

First up, yet another gripe about the inability of Democrats to get their message across. What led to this was this article at the Boston Globe which tells us:

Two years into a presidency that the White House casts as the most effective in modern history, President Biden is set to deliver a State of the Union address Tuesday to a skeptical country with a majority of Americans saying they do not believe he has achieved much since taking office, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll.

The poll finds that 62 percent of Americans think Biden has accomplished “not very much’’ or “little or nothing’’ during his presidency, while 36 percent say he has accomplished “a great deal’’ or “a good amount.’’ On many of Biden’s signature initiatives — from improving the country’s infrastructure to making electric vehicles more affordable to creating jobs — majorities of Americans say they do not believe he has made progress, the poll finds.

While the Democrats had a thin majority (thanks Manchin and Sinema), against strong odds they still accomplished a lot, but it’s not surprising that the American people are largely unaware of that fact, inasmuch as Democrats suck at messaging. The Republicans have been more successful demonizing a group (transgender folks) who are totally harmless and are a microscopic percentage of our population, at the same time that they’ve glorified guns. If they can sell that sort of stuff Democrats can sell improved Medicare benefits, infrastructure improvements, etc.

It’s not just the Democrats fault, of course. The media, and not just Fox, would rather cover the latest tweet by idiots like Gaetz and Greene than enlighten the public about mundane stuff like solid Democratic achievements. After all, everyone already knows that only Democrats ever do anything that actually improves the life of normal people. It’s old news. Why bother to cover such things when Donald Trump just issued another deranged tweet.

Still, if the Democrats kept pounding, and attacked the media for not covering this stuff, the media would come around. They did when Republicans attacked them for “liberal bias”, thenceforward bending over backwards to both sides everything. (I mean, some people say the earth is flat, so who are we to be dogmatic?)

Now, on to my other gripe. I only learned today that back in November France required every parking lot to install solar panels over all their parking spaces. How can we let France beat us at this sort of thing! As the linked article demonstrates, t’s a no-brainer, as is a requirement that all new construction incorporate solar systems whenever feasible. This may happen in the USA sometime before the year 2100, assuming we haven’t gone full fascist by then, but don’t count on it.

Filed in Rants | | Comments (0)

Judicial Intellectual Dishonesty (Who would think!)

Saturday, February 4, 2023

Just before he died at the hands of someone who should never have had a gun, John Lennon gave an interview to Playboy, in which he asserted that “everything is the opposite of what it is, isn’t it”.

I won’t go into details on Lennon’s thinking or reasoning, but it looks like right wing judges are following his lead. Here’s an interesting analysis of a recent concurring opinion by a federal circuit court judge holding that a man could not be held criminally liable for possessing guns after he had voluntarily agreed to a court order forbidding him to own guns.

The judge, Judge James Ho, cited numerous cases in support of his concurrence. The only problem is that the cases don’t support his position that the right to bear arms is an unqualified one, they point out the absurdity of the position.

It’s always difficult for conservative judges to find support for their “deeply historical” analysis of the Second Amendment since it doesn’t exist. Even the majority opinion explicitly notes that, “In Emerson, we held that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to keep and bear arms—the first circuit expressly to do so.” Since Emerson was decided in 2001, this is just letting pride get in the way of Originalist gaslighting. Come on, Fifth Circuit! You can’t go around admitting that the individual right to gun possession is barely old enough to drink.

So kudos to Judge Ho for trying to build a historical case! Unfortunately, neither of these cited opinions have much to do with the Second Amendment.

And they both… prove the opposite of what he’s arguing.

The discussion at the link is an extended one, so I won’t quote more. Suffice to say that the thrust of the cases Ho cites is that the rights enumerated in the constitution are not unlimited, even freedom of speech and religion. In each, the judge from the saner period of our history uses the second amendment as an example of the absurdity of treating any of the rights as unqualified because obviously the right to bear arms is not unlimited.

But to too many of our current judges, everything is the opposite of what it is, whenever it’s convenient. And remember, Ho wasn’t the only judge basically deciding that the right to bear arms is unqualified. He was merely agreeing with the majority of judges on the Fifth Circuit case that a man who agreed to a court order not to bear arms could still bear arms.

Just to expand a bit on what the sane judges in the cases Ho cited were saying, it is self evident that none of the rights enumerated in the Bill or Rights are unqualified. If I say that my religion requires me to sacrifice the lives of random strangers (or even willing victims) I will end up in jail. Or I should, but with the present Supreme Court, you never know. After all, they are quite willing to allow gun owners the right to the weaponry needed to take the lives of random strangers. As another example, which is still valid assuming it’s a Democrat doing the speaking, I have every right to libel someone, but I am going to end up paying damages if I do.

Filed in Creeping Totalitarianism, Lawyer stuff | | Comments (0)

A step too far?

Sunday, January 29, 2023

It is a political fact of life in this country that Republicans get themselves elected by distracting their base, inasmuch as their actual priorities consist mainly in screwing that base. It always reminds me of the Bob Dylan song, Only a Pawn in Their Game, that taught me as a young teen about the political methodology employed by the right. In those days, that included Southern Democrats, but those days are long gone. Republicans now have a monopoly on the tactic. It’s against the rules to explicitly demonize black people nowadays, though the implied demonizations are becoming closer and closer to explicit. Gays don’t work very well any more, so they’ve gone on to transgender people, who have to be the most vulnerable and least threatening people in the country. But for people who need a bogeyman, they apparently work.

Still, it seems to me that you have to be a bit careful in terms of how you screw the base while you distract them. At some point, you risk them getting wise to the fact that they’re getting screwed and, more importantly, precisely who is screwing them.

Which brings me to the latest Republican proposal: abolition of the income and payroll taxes, replaced by a 30% national sales tax, which would presumably be on top of the various state sales taxes. It’s not going anywhere, but it’s indicative of where these people are coming from, and as the linked article notes, the Democrats have actually opened fire.

The objective, of course, would be to screw the base by shifting the tax burden even more onto them, while relieving the rich from what little remains of their own tax burdens. The thing is, even the yahoos, or lots of them can understand that they’d be screwed by such a system, though they might not realize that besides hitting them hard in their pockets, it would likely destroy social security, something upon which they all rely, though they’d never admit they only get it because of us libtards.

I remember sometime in 2013 predicting on this blog that the next Republican presidential candidate would be nutjob, and that they could no longer get by appealing to the crazies but nominating “centrists” like Romney or McCain. Sure enough, we got Trump, and we’re not likely to see a reasonable Republican candidate (are there any reasonable Republicans?) in 2024 that gets any measure of primary support.

The inmates have taken control of the asylum, and it’s only a matter of time before they insist on pushing proposals like the national sales tax, because though they have risen to power by utilizing distraction etc., rightwingers who think like their nutjob base (but who still want to screw them) are now actually members of Congress, and they don’t have the brains to realize that you have to make sure you disguise the stuff you’re doing to your voters. You don’t say the quiet part out loud.

The Republicans have, in the past few years, lost quite a few former Republicans, the type of person who inherited their party affiliation from their parents, and who only now, with Trump, have come to realize that the party of their parents is no more. The party, now more than ever, can’t afford to lose the nutjobs, but proposals like the national sales tax might even make those folks take notice. It might help if the Democrats made it a point to keep asking those type of people precisely what the Republicans have actually done for them lately.

Meanwhile, folks like DeSantis are trying to insure that the base stays as ignorant as possible. The attack on public education is all about keeping the majority of the country as ignorant and as open to propaganda as possible.

We have to hope that the Democrats will get their act together and highlight this sort of thing. It doesn’t matter that it went nowhere. It’s indicative of what they want, and if they play it right it we can use it against them like they used “defund the police” against us.

Filed in Republicans | | Comments (0)