Skip to content

Jodi-out of the loop

Only Jodi Rell, rumored to be the most popular governor in the nation, could get away with criticizing herself. Two days ago, the Democrats complained that they’d been kept in the dark about the rising cost of a railroad maintenance facility in New Haven. This seems fair on their part. It was, after all, officials in Rell’s administration that hid the rising costs from the legislators.

Never to be outdone, or on the wrong side of an issue, the governor now claims that she too is outraged by the actions of her own administration. Apparently, no one in her administration bothered to tell her about the $250 million in extra costs. More than likely they figured there was no need to go any higher than Lisa Moody. What a luxury for Rell, she even gets to attack her own administration as if she’s a passive bystander to events.

Did I say “as if”? That’s unfair to Jodi. She in fact is a passive bystander so she has a perfect right to act the part.

New Moveon Video

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suNqiAgE1kw[/youtube]

Revising and expanding my remarks

Yesterday I mentioned that McCain might find it easier still to get away with the lies that he tells about Iraq if he could keep some basic stuff, like the difference between Shiite and Sunni straight. He put his ignorance on display when he confused Sunni and Shiite yet again in his questions to Bush’s puppet general.

But embedded it that exchange was a larger deception, one I am convinced is not the result of mere ignorance, but is part of a deliberate, if so far blessedly unsuccessful strategy, the object of which is to scare the American people into supporting this absurd war. McCain got the tame general to say that Al Qaeda in Iraq, be it Sunni or Shiite, was a major threat. He did not clarify what it threatened, but can we assume that it is allegedly a threat to our “goal” of a democratic Iraq.

McCain and his ilk have seized on this group for one reason and one reason only: the bogeyman effect. The group shares a name with Osama bin Laden’s group, so repeating that name is bound to ratchet up the twin emotions of fear and loathing. Never mind that it is a minor player in Iraq, never mind that it lacks support even among Sunnis. Ignore also the fact that its presence in Iraq has been vastly overstated or that it is probably the first group that will be crushed by whoever takes over after we leave.

It is sufficient for McCain that he can use the term “Al Qaeda”, implicitly reinforcing the discredited connection between Iraq and Osama bin Laden. Since this is McCain, his inability to separate Shiite from Sunni garners whatever negative media attention he might get. The fact that he, along with Petreaus, Bush and the usual cast of crazies (including St. Joe) are pumping up a fringe group, gets no media attention at all. The importance of Al Qaeda in Iraq is one of those articles of faith which cannot be questioned, like the oft repeated but untrue assertion that the world is better off without Saddam in Iraq. Constant repetition doesn’t make something true, but it can make it truthy, and that’s all that matters.

Michael Ware reacts to Petreaus testimony

Michael Ware tells the truth on television:

One must wonder why they can’t find guys with brains like that to put in front of the camera on a day to day basis, instead of brain dead people like Blitzer. Or does the comfortable life inside the Beltway cause brain death in formerly intelligent people?

Ware is right. Obama wasn’t bad, but the truth is that all of these people are engaged in an elaborate Kabuki show. Petreaus pretends to be telling the truth, knowing full well that all the Senators know he’s lying. They pretend to take him at his word. They make ritual obeisance to his uniform (How far we have travelled from the founder’s suspicion of a standing army). They ask questions they know he will not fully answer. He gives them answers that he knows they know are misleading, incomplete and disingenuous. After it’s done they all shake hands and smile.

Interesting note: the clip goes on to shows a teaser about John Hagee, the McCain loving bigot. I’d be interested to see the whole thing.

Another Lieberman Lie exposed

Joe Lieberman is a man of integrity. Just ask anyone, as long as the person you are asking is Joe Lieberman. He’ll tell you.

He would never, for instance, accuse anyone of something on the basis of exactly no evidence, would he? Well, as we all know, he would, as long as that person is a Democrat, and now we have proof positive from the Justice Department (you can rely on this evidence, they didn’t want to release it) that he did just that.

Congrats to the Stamford Advocate for not forgetting this story:

A federal investigation has concluded that U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman’s 2006 re-election campaign was to blame for the crash of its Web site the day before Connecticut’s heated Aug. 8 Democratic primary.

The FBI office in New Haven found no evidence supporting the Lieberman campaign’s allegations that supporters of primary challenger Ned Lamont of Greenwich were to blame for the Web site crash.

Lieberman, who was fighting for his political life against the anti-Iraq war candidate Lamont, implied that joe2006.com was hacked by Lamont supporters.

Actually, he didn’t “imply” anything. He out and out accused Ned or his supporters of hacking his site. They correctly replied that his site sucked and it was his own fault.

The Advocate had to wait a year for its FOIA request to be honored. Could it be that the Justice Department didn’t want to embarass “Democrat” Joe?

Speaking of Joe, it’s good to know that the voters of Connecticut have buyer’s remorse big time. If they could have a do over, Ned Lamont would be our senator.

Now, if only the Senate Democrats would get a little religion. I have a dinner riding on this, but I still hate to win my bet. Harry Reid has said that Joe will keep his seniority and chairmanships, no matter how much he betrays “his” caucus.

Keeping the players straight

According to an email I received today from Howard Dean (we go way back, he emails me almost every day) John McCain once again mixed up Shiites and Sunnis, proving once again that he is as much of an expert on the region as George Bush or Bill Kristol, who more than once told us, before the war, that there was little chance that these groups would have at one another.

On at least one of the occasions McCain messed up, he caught himself, sort of (see the first link above), but he needn’t have bothered. McCain has made a habit of confusing Sunnis and Shiites, along with spouting other blather about Iraq (such as his absurd claim that it was Sadr that backed down recently), but he gets a free pass for his “gaffes” from a press corps that would crucify either Clinton or Obama for saying the same things. This cuts two ways for McCain. He is fully aware that he is immune from the need to be either consistent or honest, so he doesn’t stay on his toes. So far he’s paid no price for his stupidity, but he really can’t afford to get lazy. You never know. The Democrats might get a clue and start coordinating their message.

So, if only for forms sake, McCain might want to bone up a little on the region. So far as the Sunni-Shiite thing goes, he might start with a little mnemonic my wife taught me. Saddam was a Sunni, so remember him as Sunny Saddam. Then, when you’re trying to remember who’s who, think of Sunny Saddam, and your there. It does get tougher from there, but it’s still pretty easy if you remember some very basic history.

Case in point: McCain can’t remember whether Al Qaeda is Shiite or Sunni. Well, first start with Sunny Saddam. Now you know who the Sunnis are, they’re the Saddamites. Step two: Recall that Al Qaeda are terrorists. Now, just remember that Saddam was not harboring terrorists, and boom, you’ve got it, Al Qaeda must be Sunnis. And they are. This works for me every time and it could work for McCain. If he kept those basic facts straight he’d have even an easier time getting away with the lies he’s telling about the progress of the war itself. As it is, even given the obsequious press that he gets, someone may notice that he doesn’t have the basic stuff down. And it’s not that hard, after all. Even lying Joe Lieberman can remember this stuff.

I note that at the link above, there is a quote from the McCain campaign to the effect that McCain stumbled during his questioning and then corrected himself. In fact, if you watch the video, also at the link, you’ll see that it is just as likely that he wasn’t sure who Al Qaeda was, so he figured he’d cover his bets. Here’s the exchange:

MCCAIN: Do you still view al Qaeda in Iraq as a major threat?

PETRAEUS: It is still a major threat, though it is certainly not as major a threat as it was say 15 months ago.

MCCAIN: Certainly not an obscure sect of the Shi’ites overall?

PETREAUS: No.

MCCAIN: Or Sunnis or anybody else.

He didn’t correct himself. He still wasn’t sure. The “or anybody else” gives that away. He was just barely smart enough to figure that his first statement might have been wrong, so if he added the second he could sufficiently confuse the issue.

More nonsense from the Senate

“There are two things you will never wish to watch: the making of sausage and the making of legislation.”

The above has apparently been variously attributed, but no matter who said it, it was a base canard against all the honorable sausage makers out there.

I commented before on the Senate’s foreclosure prevention bill, which contains an absurd tax break for homebuilders. Apparently, that is not the only bit of mischief our lawmakers have put into this bill. Dean Baker points with approval to this editorial in the Washington Post, which exposes yet another piece of idiocy in the bill:

We refer to a $7,000 tax credit (payable over two years) to anyone who purchases a foreclosed home within a year of the proposal’s enactment. Supposedly, this would help clear the nation’s swollen inventory of repossessed properties, thus propping up home prices more generally. Here’s the catch. For lenders as well as borrowers, foreclosure is an expensive hassle. If at all possible, most banks would rather avoid repossessing a house, which they must then try to resell. But, by making it cheaper to buy a foreclosed house than a comparable unforeclosed property, the tax credit makes it more feasible to sell one. The cost and hassle — for the lender — of foreclosure go down, and the benefits go up. Other things being equal, lenders would be that much more likely to foreclose — rather than to help homeowners stay in their houses on modified terms.

I haven’t read the bill, and my inherent laziness prevents me from doing so, but if it applies to persons buying at foreclosure sales, such as we have here in Connecticut, it would allow the banks, who often bid in their own foreclosure sales, to pocket the tax break.

By the way, the Post also has something to say about the tax break I mentioned on Thursday:

Perhaps the only provision that’s more objectionable is the bill’s $6 billion tax break for money-losing home builders — who threatened not to give any more campaign money when they got shut out of the economic stimulus bill in February.

Those homebuilders withholding their contributions are likely not the guys who build one or two spec houses a year. They are the giant developers, who made big bucks in an unholy alliance with the subprime people.

I would like to think that provisions like this are the price the Democrats must pay for getting sufficient votes to pass an otherwise needed bill, but even I am not that much of a true believer.

What we’re up against

Barack Obama will have two opponents in the fall. If he were only running against John McCain, his victory would be a sure thing. But his other opponent is the media, the only group of people in this country who think John McCain is an inspiring leader. In the end, as in 2000, they will stop at nothing to elect their favored candidate. He may be wrong about everything, but he’s been wrong about all the things they’ve been wrong about, so they love him. Besides, he gives them drinks and feeds them barbecued meat. Check out this video from Media Matters. This is CNN, not the Fox Network. Reporter Jim Acosta reports that McCain was heckled.

If that’s the kind of “incoming” that McCain has faced in the past, then those tales of heroism have, like everything else in McCain’s history, been wildly overhyped.

Obama can still win this election, but only if he realizes that his most powerful opponent is the press. A co-ordinated counteroffensive by the rest of the party is in order here. We can’t let them do to Obama what they did to Gore.

Goings on around town

Today the subject is art, food and New London, and local boosterism, not necessarily in that order. This post is mainly for any readers not from the area, and to those in the area who never set foot in New London. It’s a happening place.

New London is turning around, despite the general incompetence of its political establishment. That turnaround, at least from my perspective is being led by, or is manifested by, the vibrancy of the artistic community and the great restaurants that have sprung up on Bank Street and State Street. My wife and I are partial to Brie and Blue, card reproduced below, where you can get a great lunch, and enjoy your choice of wine or beer from the Thames Rivery Wine & Spirits. We did just that, and followed up with some great ice cream from Michael’s Dairy, just down the street.

brieblue.jpg

Right across the street from Brie and Blue is the Hygienic Art Gallery. Old time New Londoner’s know that it occupies space formerly occupied by a restaurant by that name (“Hygienic” not “Art Gallery”). Why anyone would name a restaurant “Hygienic”, unless they were very defensive, is beyond me. Anyway, the Art Gallery has been there for years, its side, facing an outdoor performance space, being a familiar landmark in New London.

hygenic.jpg

The art is sometimes a bit offbeat, but always worth the trip. We loved the current exhibit, which includes photographs of New London by Milton Moore. That’s his work on the announcement for the current show. New London never looked so good.

The Hygienic is at 79-83 Bank Street. If you get a chance stop in. This show is well worth seeing, in my humble opinion. It runs until April 20th, at which time we can go pick up the picture we bought.

hygenic-picture.jpg

Our fair City of Groton is also in the art game. Last year I wrote about Art on Groton Bank, one of whose organizers is Liberal Drinker Audrey Heard. Audrey sent along an announcement, which I’m reproducing below.

The Bill Memorial Library at 240 Monument Street in Groton City, Connecticut is again sponsoring Art on Groton Bank in its second season of a continuing festival of fine arts to be held on the library grounds on June 21, July 19, and August 16, from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Join us as we recapture the joy of Paris, of its stalls along the River Seine, where artists line their works along the banks. We have modeled our exhibit on that greatest of art cities.

Last summer, our first season, was successful as we brought artists and visitors together on beautiful Groton Heights. We made it an artist’s place, where visitors mingled with painters, sculptors, graphic artists, photographers and fine arts artisans. You can not only talk the talk, meet artists, make art on site if you choose, but you can buy art. The exhibits are non-juried but attract many of the finest artists in the region including alumni, graduates and students of Lyme Academy of Fine Art. Last summer, The Wall Street Journal recommended small art shows with ties to famous art schools as the last great place to buy good art at affordable price and possibly find future masterpieces.

Groton Heights is a singular spot, a beautiful site overlooking the Thames River. It is across the road from Fort Griswold, one of two extant revolutionary war battlefields. Stroll the earthworks, picnic on the grounds. Visit the neighboring museum and the Monument. Listen to the river sounds, and enjoy the breezes on our beautiful hill top.

The welcoming and friendly Friends of the Library make delicious goodies for sale. There are nearby restaurants where food can be ordered for pick-up or eat-in. Facilities are close, as is free parking. There is no charge to visit the exhibitions.

For information or to reserve an artist’s space, please go to our website or call 860 449 0825. The exhibits are non-juried but attract many of the finest artists in the area, including alumni, graduates and students of Lyme Academy of Fine Arts.

The Library is easily accessible from I95. Take exit 87 to the first set of stop lights at Meridian Avenue. Turn right, straight through to deadend at Monument Street. Turn left, then go two short blocks to the Library. Keep your eye on the Monument. Park wherever.

In one thing we in Groton have an advantage. From Groton Bank we have a view across the river of a New London which is still fairly picturesque. Those in New London returning the favor must endure a view dominated by the ugliness of EB and Pfizer. If you direct your view with precision, toward Groton Bank itself, and resolutely ignore the hideousness of the shore directly to the right of the Bank, then it’s not so bad.

Here’s a view of the site of the Art Show from the top of the Monument (quite a trek up, as I can testify).

grton-bank-1.jpg

And here’s Audrey, in front of her own creations.

grton-bank-2.jpg

We got a great painting last summer at an incredibly low price, so what Audrey has to say about small art shows is true, at least it was in our case.

Friday Night Music-The Stones

This was a last minute choice, on the front page at Youtube, but I couldn’t resist. This is from 2006. Not bad for a bunch of old geezers.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-TCP38r6Iw[/youtube]