Skip to content

Finally

IOS 4.2 is finally here. I know this means nothing to you non-Ipad owners, but for those who do own the fabled tablet, this update is supposed to bring eternal happiness, along with 100 new features, though when they’re listed, they always seem to peter out at about 10.

I’ll be fooling around with it for the rest of the evening. Verdict so far: Folders are handy. Airplay is great, but seems to skip out spontaneously for no particular reason. Nice to have multi-tasking. The printing capabilities are far less than originally advertised. I’m not about to go out and buy a special printer just for my Ipad, at least I hope I won’t.


Forgotten again

I don’t know whether the NAACP’s complaints about Malloy’s transition team are valid, but as a Southeastern Connecticut transplant, I feel I must point out that, as near as I can see, Nancy Wyman hails from about as far to the east as anyone on the team, and Malloy really couldn’t not put her on the team.

It’s not surprising that we to the east have been forgotten once again. We might, were we so minded, take some measure of pride in the fact that we evoke a certain measure of bi-partisanship: Democrats and Republicans, liberals and conservatives, all ignore us.

The sad fact is that there are substantial differences between our part of the state, and that part that shades over into Yankee territory. There’s a whole different culture here, and we do deserve some measure of representation. After all, we vote and pay taxes.


Spreading Memes

Paul Krugman comments on the fact that Obama has bought in to a right wing meme intended to discredit FDR. The argument they make is that FDR delayed taking action to deal with the Depression for six months, in order to build political support for the actions he eventually did take.

There’s no truth to the argument. The six months (actually 4 months, but right wingers aren’t very good at math either) in question is the period between his election and his inauguration, which was in March, not in January as it is now. During that time FDR refused to endorse and agree to stand by Hoover’s policies, which were not working, and which would not ever have worked. This meme ignores the hectic pace of the first 100 days (made possible, in part, by the fact that it only took 50 days to pass something in the Senate in those days of yore.) that I thought we all learned about in history class, but which Obama has somehow forgotten under the spell of some right wing revisionists.

It’s truly distressing that Obama has bought into this particular meme, as he has also bought in to the Reagan as great president meme. It’s particularly disheartening because in this particular case it’s rather gratuitous, as he apparently didn’t bother to check his facts. More disheartening, however, is that Obama is relying for advice on precisely the folks, the bankers and the financiers, to whom Hoover was listening and to whose orders FDR refused to march.

Obama has been pretty good about trying to reconcile the Federal government to scientific facts, but he’s not been terribly good about reconciling it with historical fact. If he’s not trying, in vain of course, to assuage the right by ignoring the roots of our current problems, he’s buying in to their skewed version of the past.

It’s dangerous to deny scientifically proven facts. It’s also dangerous to deny historical fact. Sometimes fake history becomes accepted as fact, becomes myth, and perhaps, does no terrible harm, depending on the myth. It probably does no harm if people believe George Washington couldn’t tell a lie, though even that is debatable. It does do real harm, however, if we fail to learn the lessons of the past, since, as the saying goes, we are then doomed to repeat them. The Depression is the time in the recent past most obviously comparable to today. If we misinterpret that time, then we risk the same failures. Unfortunately, we’re doing worse than FDR, since we have not repeated his successes, but we seem intent on repeating his mistakes (see, e.g., attempts to balance the budget in 1936). Besides the obvious fact that we have not repeated the job creation programs he created, we have not strengthened the working person’s rights, as FDR did, we have not passed legislation truly designed to avoid a repetition of the abuses that got us here, as FDR did, and Obama has not, as FDR did, provided a counterweight to the charlatans on the right (see, e.g., Father Coughlin/Glenn Beck), to which lack of leadership we owe the right’s ability to manipulate the fear inspired “tea party” people. It would help, as well, if one got the sense that there was a sense of urgency about the economic situation in Washington, but I don’t see it. I wasn’t around then, but I really don’t think Roosevelt spent much time worrying about government programs that might possibly run into small financial problems in 1965, rather than the millions of unemployed in 1932.

I always believed that Obama’s reelection was a sure thing, given the Republican field and the right wing crazies that have captured that party. I’m beginning to doubt that belief. Obama seems weirdly detached from the facts on the ground, unwilling to forcefully make a case for anything, unwilling to stand up for any principle, and unwilling to stray too far from the advice he gets from the people who got us into our current mess. It doesn’t help that he is willing to buy into right wing memes about the greatest Democratic president in the history of the party, particularly because it appears he actually believes this particular meme, and was not merely repeating it in yet another doomed attempt to curry favor with the Republicans.

Friday Night Music-Sir Douglas

The Sir Douglas Quintet consisted of a bunch of Texans who picked a British sounding name to try to ride the wave, so to speak. According to Wikipedia they had three reasonably good selling singles, but I only remember this one, She’s About a Mover, making them one hit wonders in my book, at least. Lead singer and band eponym Doug Sahm went on to carve out a fairly illustrious career, however.


John Oliver comes calling

Consistent with Jon Stewart’s evenly-spread-the-blame call for civility, the Daily Show has come to Southeastern Connecticut to report on the recent actually civil campaign between Democrat Andy Maynard and RINO (and I write that with deep respect) Stuart Norman.

This is the first time the Daily Show has visited our neck of the woods since some atheists tried, successfully I think, to stop Jewett City from mixing church and state in a matter involving a bell tower.

Now, Maynard and Norman’s willingness to participate in this proves something else about these guys. Not only were they able to be civil to one another and treat the voters with respect, they are also either unbelievably brave or unbelievably foolish. Take your pick. I’m assuming that the Stewart folks will try to make them look good, if for no other reason that to advance Stewart’s meme, but I’ve watched a lot of Daily Shows, and I’ve come to the conclusion that they’re not very good at making their victims look good, even when they seem to want to.

For what it’s worth, both Norman and Maynard deserve the recognition. Wouldn’t it be nice if every campaign was run like theirs-an honest exchange of views.

We can all look forward to seeing Andy and Stu on television, along, I’m told, with some of our friends and neighbors who were interviewed for the show. I’ll be posting it here, once it’s aired. I would like to add that I think it’s a shame that they didn’t think to get the take of local political bloggers (of which, come to think of it, I am the lone example) on the subject.

We have all been here before

Why do they even bother?

The New York Times reports that Harry Reid is once again promising to bring DADT repeal to the Senate floor.

Is there any sentient being out there who doesn’t already know that Reid will meekly forget the whole thing once the Republicans use their minority to block the bill? Is there any sentient being who thinks that either Reid or Obama will put any pressure on the Republicans, or attempt to frame the debate in any way, shape or form to try to actually get the measure to a vote? Why even bother. They make such a pitiful gesture out of the whole thing that they just end up alienating the people they are supposedly trying to help, and reinforce the Republican’s confidence that they are calling the shots.

This is a bit like Charlie Brown telling everyone he sees that he just had a great idea: he’s going to ask Lucy to hold the football for him.

I’d much rather hear Reid say that he’s going to change the rules come January. We might as well face facts on DADT and just about everything else. The Democrats have successfully allowed the Republicans to call the shots. The best Obama can hope for in the next two years is to get his appointees and his judges confirmed, and he can’t do that unless the Senate changes its rules.


A Musical Treat

Feeling depressed by the state of the world these days? Over 55? Head on over to Itunes and watch the Beatles Concert at the Washington Coliseum. Their first appearance on U.S. soil after the Sullivan show. It’s free, at least for now. You can’t watch it without feeling just a little better, albeit perhaps a little older.


The next bailout foretold

Looks like we may have another bailout coming:

Widespread problems in how U.S. lenders documented foreclosures could spark a wave of legal challenges resulting in massive losses to banks and serious new troubles for the housing market, a federal watchdog warned on Tuesday.

In the worst-case scenario, the panel said banks may be unable to prove that they own the mortgage loans they claim to own, legal challenges could call into question the validity of 33 million mortgage loans — many of which were then securitized and sold to investors — and banks could face billions of dollars in unexpected losses.

If, indeed, the worst happens, the banks will once again go to the Feds with their hands outstretched. These are the banks who purchased a Republican Congress just a few weeks ago, the same Republicans who were blaming Obama for the bailout that they voted for and from which their contributors benefitted so much.

Here’s what should happen, if the Democrats had any brains and/or political sense. The Democrats would step back and let the Republicans, with a smattering of blue dogs, take the lead in trying to rescue the banks. Make them step up, load and clear. Obama should threaten to veto any new bailout. This time, we should nationalize, as we should have done the last time. At all events, the Democrats should force the Republicans to put their fingerprints indelibly on any bailout.

Here’s what will happen. Obama will step up to “do the right thing”. He will seek bipartisan compromise. He will get some Democrats to fall on their swords, whose votes, along with those of safe-district Republicans, will be enough to get the banks what they want. Once the deed is safely done, the Republicans will tar the Democrats with it.

Then Obama will blame himself for not fostering a more bi-partisan atmosphere.

To which one can only observe that even Charlie Brown never blamed himself when Lucy pulled back the football.

The New York Times follows the Day’s lead

A while back I noted that the New London Day printed a story about some ghostbusters, without giving even a passing clause to the idea that, just possibly, there are no such things as ghosts.

PZ Myers points out over at Pharyngula that the New York Times is apparently as credulous as the Day.

The Times printed an entire story about a revival of the use of exorcism in the Catholic Church without once questioning the basic premise that a person can be possessed by a demon. Apparently, when it comes to spooks or religion, there aren’t two sides of the story. “Balance” is apparently reserved for scientific issues like global warming, where scientific consensus is balanced by the misrepresentations of the self-interested and the deluded.

Global Warming Myth Debunked

Since everything is evidence that global warming is a myth, I submit the following as exhibits, pictures of roses taken today in my wife’s garden.


Some might argue that the existence of blooming Connecticut roses (and should the tiny little fellow in the second picture still be alive?) in November is more substantial evidence of global warming than, as Fox would have it, cold weather in January is evidence for its non-existence. But such people are silly rationalists, hidebound adherents to a “fact based” scientism of the past, when everyone should know, as the Republicans tell us, that God has given us his word that he won’t destroy the planet again.

The pictures were taken after we took a walk in a nearby state park, enjoying the typically balmy temperatures of mid-November.

My wife, who as a gardener pays attention to these things, tells me that we have yet to have a killing frost, which according to Connecticut’s DEP is now about a month overdue.

By they way, I realize this is, in a sense, only a single data point, much like Fox’s cold day in January. But those roses, and the little insect, owe their existence to a sustained deviation from the norm, so I maintain they are a little more significant that a cold day in the winter.