Skip to content

Consolidation in the world of god

At the Washington Monthly, Ed Kilgore notes that there has been an uptick in church foreclosures in the past year. He notes that the usual suspects that see problems for religious liberty in Obama’s religious neutral requirements imposed on insurance plans, don’t seem to have a problem with the banks destroying the religious infrastructure.

Part of me is cheering on the banks. Every church that is boarded and shuttered is one less monument to superstition and ignorance. But there is a real danger here, for in the fine American tradition of monopoly building, it looks like what is going on is a consolidation.

The church foreclosures have hit all denominations across America, black and white, but with small to medium size houses of worship the worst. Most of these institutions have ended up being purchased by other churches.

Bigger churches, no doubt.

Many Protestant denominations have a tradition of local control, an outgrowth of the antipathy toward the bishops and Popes when Protestantism was young. Those were also days when very smart people engaged in endless religious debate, and even the lowly parishioner was well informed about these issues. Doctrinal disputes, at least among the evangelicals, appear to have receded in importance. A shared sense of victimization and fear of the rational unites the religious these days, to the point where the nutcase Protestants are perfectly happy to make common cause with the whore of Babylon. (That would be the Catholic Church, for the untutored) Religion is becoming commodified, and we may have reached a point where the average church going crazy will accept the Wal-Martization of religion with the same sheep like indifference with which he or she accepted the Wal-Martization of the rest of America. In other words, any purveyor of the toxic mix of hate, fear, superstition and ignorance that is religion in America will do.

Religion is big business, so these foreclosures may just be accelerating an inevitable trend: the concentration of religious power and money (in this country, is there a difference?) into the hands of a few powerful men (and as the last few days have proven, they will be men). This in turn poses a threat to the functioning secular majority, as the corporatized churches will make common cause to further their shared business plan. You can’t shear sheep unless you have sheep, and all religions depend on the manufacture of more sheep to grow their businesses. You can’t grow good sheep without inculcating superstition and preserving ignorance, a business plan that sits well with the Republican party and the corporations it is their true mission to support, both of which depend on those same sheep to obtain and preserve power. They may not be a majority, but they will work together to achieve their ends. It’s worked well so far, and as the Mom and Pop churches are replaced by the big franchises it will work even better, as church money flows toward the Republicans and as Republicans, as they have done for the banks and secular corporations, find ways to send taxpayer dollars flowing back to the churches.

 

Friday Night VIdeo

This is a week late, but I would be remiss if I didn’t note Davey Jones passing with something by the Monkees. Now, to the purist they were not a group at all, being as they didn’t play their own instruments, at least at the start, but then, they did do their own singing, at least I think they did. Given that rather salient fact, it stands to reason there would be no videos of them actually singing one of their songs, so I shall break a rule here and play what you might call a music video, which appears to be an outtake from one of the shows. Yes, boys and girls, we really did watch this sort of thing.

One thing the Monkees had going for them is that their music was penned by some good writers, and the instruments were played by good studio musicians. They were a ginned up TV band, but all things considered, the music was pretty good. This song, one of the best, was, in my opinion, sung far better by its composer, Neal Diamond, who, in my humble opinion, has been somewhat underrated. But this is Monkees night, so here’s a Monkees version.

Some things never change

So, since yesterday morning I’ve been spending most of my time writing under pressure, as I had two (actually one and a half) days to respond to something the other side had weeks to put together. The judge saw things my way, which was a relief, but I’m really in no mood to bend my mind to writing anything that requires actual thinking, as I’m about thunk out. So this is a no thinking required post.

My wife and I watch the Daily Show and Colbert on Hulu one day after the fact, so today we saw last night’s Daily Show, which included this skit:

The Daily Show with Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
The Socialist Network
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog The Daily Show on Facebook

It’s not the fact that the right winger couldn’t cite an example of Obama’s socialism that struck me. That’s to be expected and is no longer worth noting. No, it was the very modern example of an age old problem for the left. This scene from one of the greatest movies of all time, Monty Python’s Life of Brian, immediately came to mind:

Deja vu all over again

Almost under the radar, the neocons are doing it again: setting us up for yet another can’t win military adventure in the Middle East, this time against the much tougher Iran, into which we will be dragged by the Israeli tail that keeps wagging the American dog.

Amazingly enough, we will once again be led into war by people claiming that a regime has nukes when, at least based on the evidence available, said regime does not, in fact, have nukes and all the people pushing toward war are once again pitting their own fevered fantasies against the best intelligence.

This may be Obama’s supreme test. If Netanyahu attacks Israel, he will come under tremendous pressure to join in. If he does, he will commit us to a war that will cost far more in lives and treasure than the Iraqi adventure, with longer lasting negative consequences.

It will be sickeningly interesting to see if the punditocracy and media once again mindlessly amplify the war drums-once again ignore the protests- and once again marginalize the well informed naysayers. If they do, then perhaps we can truly say that, as the right wing has so often proclaimed we must, we have unlearned the lessons of Vietnam, and the far more recent lessons of Iraq.

This might all be avoided, of course, if Obama simply agreed to attack, the sole condition being that William Kristol and Joe Lieberman’s be the first feet on the ground.

So many suckers, so little time

Another chapter in the ongoing saga of Republican grifters. Republican/Fascist sheriff Joe Arpaio is investigating Obama’s birth certificate (any bets on what his conclusion will be?) with the help of allegedly renowned volunteer investigator, Michael Zullo, who, with the help of veteran grifter Jerome Corsi, has written a book to soak the rubes that still cling to the desperate hope that their firmly held belief that black people are ineligible for the presidency can somehow be legally established, at least in the present case.

Zullo’s book was co-authored by Jerome Corsi, a writer for the conservative website WorldNetDaily who has been hawking the notion of a phony birth certificate for years. Corsi published his own book last year called “Where’s the Birth Certificate? The Case that Barack Obama is not Eligible to be President.”

Corsi also took part in last week’s news conference and said he fed information and documents to investigators.

He told the Phoenix TV station that he and Zullo are splitting the profits from the new book, which is similarly titled “A Question of Eligibility: A Law Enforcement Investigation into Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate and His Eligibility to be President.” Neither Arpaio nor the sheriff’s office would be making any money from the book, he said.

“Since he’s a volunteer, Mike owns his work product and as such, he’s permitted to utilize that work product for compensation,” Corsi told the news station.

Far be it from me to wish Corsi well, but as he’s going to spend his time smearing some Democrat, I heartily approve of him staying on the trail of the phony birth certificate and relieving the rubes of money that might otherwise go to real political campaigns. Someone, and apparently no one knows who, once said that there’s a sucker born every minute. Luckily, most of them grow up to be Republicans.

A Quiz

 

 

I didn’t think he had it in him

The non-apology apology is an American art form. I don’t know if it exists in other cultures, but my guess is that if there are analogs, they reflect the various cultures in which those foreign non-apologies are delivered. Here in the U.S.A., where hypocrisy is itself an art form, the non-apology apology usually consists of some variation of the “I’m sorry if anyone was offended by what really was a perfectly reasonable statement” pronouncement. A well framed non-apology apology is crafted so that the speaker can claim to have apologized, while having in reality attacked the person to whom the apology is directed yet again, and in a manner that shields the “apologist” from further recriminations.

Well, if this form of apology is an art form, then Rush Limbaugh may just be the Leonardo da Vinci of the form. I read it here, but it’s all over the internet:

For over 20 years, I have illustrated the absurd with absurdity, three hours a day, five days a week. In this instance, I chose the wrong words in my analogy of the situation. I did not mean a personal attack on Ms. Fluke.

I think it is absolutely absurd that during these very serious political times, we are discussing personal sexual recreational activities before members of Congress. I personally do not agree that American citizens should pay for these social activities. What happened to personal responsibility and accountability? Where do we draw the line? If this is accepted as the norm, what will follow? Will we be debating if taxpayers should pay for new sneakers for all students that are interested in running to keep fit?In my monologue, I posited that it is not our business whatsoever to know what is going on in anyone’s bedroom nor do I think it is a topic that should reach a Presidential level.

My choice of words was not the best, and in the attempt to be humorous, I created a national stir. I sincerely apologize to Ms. Fluke for the insulting word choices.

Now if Rush actually wrote this, it’s a masterpiece for which he must be congratulated. I suspect, however, that it was a member of my own profession that penned this monument to hypocrisy. What a gem! It may never be equaled, it cannot be surpassed. A heaping, reeking pile of mendacity from first to last, it will still quiet the mainstream media, which is all that counts, because it uses the words “sincerely apologize” and that’s all they need to see. It matters not that his profession that he never meant to personally attack Ms. Fluke, a lie so brazen that it leaves you breathless, is followed by an entire paragraph attacking her yet again. Note how he artfully incorporates the standard Republican technique that has worked so well in the past: repeat a lie or justification incessantly until the faithful come to believe it and everyone else grows weary. In this case, he takes shelter in the terminology already proffered by Santorum. This technique has been on full display in this birth control debate from the very beginning, as the Republicans try with might and main to cast their war on women as a fight for religious freedom. Finally, Rush (or his lawyer) has invented a new riff on the “I’m sorry if I offended anyone..” theme, for in the end, he’s not apologizing for what he said, but for the words with which he said it. Had he simply, for instance, replaced “slut” with “woman of easy virtue”, all would have been well.

But you know, we all make mistakes, so maybe I’m being harsh and should cut Rush some slack. For instance, the other day I referred to Rush Limbaugh as a steaming pile of dog shit. In my attempt to be humorous, I went too far. I did not mean it to be a personal attack and I want to sincerely apologize to dog shit everywhere.

Friday Night Music

A anthem ready made for the Obama campaign, if they have the smarts to use it, and if Bruce lets them.

This, from an Obama speech to some union workers, seems to echo Bruce:

Because I’ve got to admit, it’s been funny to watch some of these politicians completely rewrite history now that you’re back on your feet. These are the folks who said if we went forward with our plan to rescue Detroit, “you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye.” Now they’re saying they were right all along. Or worse, they’re saying that the problem is that you, the workers, made out like bandits in all of this; that saving the American auto industry was just about paying back unions. Really? Even by the standards of this town, that’s a load of you-know-what. About 700,000 retirees saw a reduction in the health care benefits they had earned. Many of you saw hours reduced, or pay and wages scaled back. You gave up some of your rights as workers. Promises were made to you over the years that you gave up for the sake and survival of this industry, its workers, and their families. You want to talk about values? Hard work – that’s a value. Looking out for one another – that’s a value. The idea that we’re all in it together – that I am my brother’s keeper; I am my sister’s keeper – that is a value.

More of that. It contrasts well with a guy who says he likes to fire people.

Yet another modest proposal

Back in 2007 both the Democratically controlled House and Senate passed Republican pushed resolutions condemning Moveon for hurting David Patreaus’s feefees. It was, pure and simple, a stunt designed to alienate the Democrats from their base, and the Democrats fell for it hook, line and sinker. There was, in fact, no national revulsion at what Moveon had done. It was a ginned up controversy.

In 2009 a Democratic controlled Congress, again at the instigation of Republicans, destroyed Acorn without even the benefit of a kangaroo court, on trumped up charges orchestrated by the thankfully late and totally unlamented Andrew Breitbart. I can’t recall that a voice was raised in defense of Acorn. No hearing that would have exposed the frame was ever held.

Rush Limbaugh is now hurling vile sexually charged insults at a young woman who has done nothing but exercise her right to speak. (This, by the way, from a man whose own sex life will not bear scrutiny.)

So why won’t the Democrats use the Republicans’ tactics against them? Why not make them vote on whether to condemn Limbaugh? Whatever way they might vote, they lose.

Of course, I have no hope that anyone will actually propose such a resolution, or that the Democrats as a group will force a vote like the minority Republicans were able to do in the instances I’ve cited. It might destroy civility in Washington.

Need he ask?

Paul Krugman ends this morning column with a question:

Put it this way: Are you worried about a “Greek-style collapse”? Well, these plans would slash spending in the near term, emulating Europe’s catastrophic austerity, even while locking in budget-busting tax cuts for the future.

The question now is whether someone offering this toxic combination of irresponsibility, class warfare, and hypocrisy can actually be elected president.

Answer: Yes, see e.g., Reagan, Ronald, and Bush, George W.