Skip to content

Yet another modest proposal

Thursday, June 20, 2024

The latest lie (there may be a new one before I post this) the right is spreading is the claim that Joe Biden wanted to be able to sit through the upcoming debate, yet another example of projection since it’s unlikely Trump will be able to stay awake through the whole thing, assuming he doesn’t back out. Josh Hawley has embraced this particular lie, and he surely knows it’s a lie. CNN, which is running the debate, has denied it. It is yet another indication that the Republicans are setting the stage for Trump to back out and blame Biden somehow.

It has become commonplace for Trump’s ass kissers (you know, the guys who want to be vice president) to embrace these lies.

Now, surely each of these liars is aware of the fact that Trump is rapidly declining into senility. (I must point out here that my IPad suggested the word “senility” after I typed the five words that precedes it. Good programming) It is highly unlikely that, if elected, he could function even up to the abysmally low standard he set in his first term. Josh knows that. So do Tim, Marco, Kristi, and all the other ass kissers who are putting their own interests over those of their country. It is not stretching things much to suggest that each sees the probability that it will be necessary to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove him and elevate the chosen one. Keep in mind that it’s also the case that none of the lickspittles auditioning for VP could ever be elected president on his or her own. Succeeding an incapacitated, dead or, in Trump’s case, imprisoned president, is pretty much the only way any of them would be in a position to complete the destruction of the Republic.

Now for the modest proposal. I suggest the Democrats accuse these craven individuals of planning such a coup if they manage to win the election. It’s exactly the kind of thing that would get under Trump’s skin, because he would believe it, since it’s exactly what he would do if he were in their shoes. The fallout would be fun to watch and would do the Republicans no good.

As an aside, should this scenario play out, the Democrats would face a difficult decision, since it requires two thirds of each House to complete the ouster of the sitting president. As a Democrat, do you acknowledge the truth of the fact that Trump is senile and vote to install someone like Josh, or do you figure the senile one can do less harm than the dictator in waiting.

Filed in Modest Proposals | | Comments (1)

A not so surprising development

Tuesday, June 11, 2024

Trump’s minions are now laying the groundwork for pulling out of the upcoming debates. Hannity is even making the risible claim that Biden will be so “jacked up” that the competition will be unfair.

I suggested last month, when the debates were first announced:

The Democrats, who rarely act in concert to push a point, should act in concert to push a point. They should begin now to taunt Trump by claiming that he is going to chicken out of the debates and try to blame Biden. They should keep up the drumbeat.

There would then be two possible outcomes.

Trump would debate and get creamed, with the entire country witnessing his diminished capacity.

Trump would pull out of the debate and, (see above) try to blame Biden, but it would simply be risible, given the fact that he would be doing exactly what the Democrats had predicted.

As the reader may realize, the Democrats have not been taunting Trump, which was the obvious thing to do. They probably won’t start now, even though it’s clear that he’s on the verge of chickening out. I’d like to be proven wrong about this, but, alas, that seems unlikely.

Filed in Democrats, The Very Stable Genius | | Comments (0)

Yet another modest proposal

Monday, June 10, 2024

I’ve complained a number of times about the failure of Democrats to get their message out in an effective way. There are some indications that the Biden campaign is trying its best, so that’s a good thing. Nonetheless, I have a modest proposal, inspired by reading this report of the latest idiotic Trump statement to his brain dead followers, which reads as follows:

I don’t care about you. I just want your vote.

There are multiple statements like this, none of which the mainstream will report, because after all, it’s just Trump being Trump. We would, of course, never hear the end of it if Biden were to say something half as stupid. My understanding is that they’re trying to say he was joking, but besides being a lie, that doesn’t make it alright. It’s not the kind of “joke” any politician with half a brain would tell.

Anyway, to my modest proposal.

I would suggest a commercial that would enlighten the masses about these sort of statements, since the media won’t do it.

Start it off something like this:

We all know that almost everything Donald Trump says is a lie, but every once in a while he tells the truth. In the interest of fairness we think everyone should know about these rare occurrences. Here are only a few.

Followed by the clip you can view at the link, and many many more like it. It would not only illustrate where he’s really coming from, but would highlight his growing dementia.

To show what a good Democrat I am, I won’t charge the Biden people for this idea.

Filed in Modest Proposals | | Comments (0)

Something happening here, what it is ain’t exactly clear

Tuesday, June 4, 2024

Well, maybe it is clear.

Just wondering how much attention this will get in the mainstream:

Nine witnesses in the criminal cases against former President Donald Trump have received significant financial benefits, including large raises from his campaign, severance packages, new jobs, and a grant of shares and cash from Trump’s media company.

The benefits have flowed from Trump’s businesses and campaign committees, according to a ProPublica analysis of public disclosures, court records and securities filings. One campaign aide had his average monthly pay double, from \(26,000 to \)53,500. Another employee got a $2 million severance package barring him from voluntarily cooperating with law enforcement. And one of the campaign’s top officials had her daughter hired onto the campaign staff, where she is now the fourth-highest-paid employee.

More in the full article. There is no absolute proof that these payments were made in order to discourage the folks involved from testifying truthfully or in a cooperative fashion, but it sure does make you wonder, doesn’t it.

Filed in The Very Stable Genius | | Comments (0)

Thursday, May 30, 2024

Just got through listening to them announce the verdict in the Trump trial. It brought this old Doonesbury cartoon to mind.

Of course, back in those days there was no chance the Supreme Court would find a way to overturn what are obviously correct verdicts.

Filed in Good News, Uncategorized | | Comments (0)

Gerrymandering 2.0

Tuesday, May 28, 2024

Apparently the Texas Republican Party sees trouble coming down the road, so it has decided to make it impossible for the majority of Texans to elect a statewide officer:

Republican Party of Texas delegates voted Saturday on a platform that called for new laws to require the Bible to be taught in public schools and a constitutional amendment that would require statewide elected leaders to win the popular vote in a majority of Texas counties.

Other proposed planks of the 50-page platform included proclamations that “abortion is not healthcare it is homicide”; that gender-transition treatment for children is “child abuse”; calls to reverse recent name changes to military bases and “publicly honor the southern heroes”; support for declaring gold and silver as legal tender; and demands that the U.S. government disclose “all pertinent information and knowledge” of UFOs.

Original article here.

I included the second paragraph just to further enlighten any reader about just how fascistic the Republican Party has become.

In the olden days the Supreme Court announced the principle of “one person one vote”, a principle which, if applied to the Texas Republican’s proposal, would render it unconstitutional. But there is now, I’m sure, an extension of that principle. Perhaps Sam Alito will quote George Orwell this time, and announce that while all people are equal, some are more equal than others, those some being those inclined to vote for Republicans. We can be sure that a similar law in a mostly blue state would be unconstitutional since it would infringe the rights of those that are more equal than others.

Filed in Creeping Totalitarianism | | Comments (0)

Denying reality

Tuesday, May 21, 2024

I read today that Dick Durbin is open to bringing back the blue slip. That’s the rule that allows a Senator to veto the nomination of any judge that will serve in his or her state. So, for instance, if Trump were president, and he wanted to appoint a fascist to be a judge here in Connecticut, Blumenthal or Murphy could veto it.

Except they couldn’t, because in order for them to have to veto it in the first place, they would have to be in the minority, and if they were in the minority and there were a Republican president the Republicans would immediately either repeal the rule or effectively ignore it and confirm the judge in question. After all, who would stop them. The Supreme Court? Okay, if that state of affairs were to come about it won’t much matter that the Democrats won’t be able to stop fascist judges, because the country will have become a fascist state, but still, the least they can do is recognize the problem and not enable the fascists.

On the other hand, if the Democrats retain the majority in the Senate and re-elect Biden, the Republicans will obstruct Biden’s appointment at every turn, and the Democrats will do nothing about it.

Someone really has to explain to people like Durbin that it’s not the 1970s anymore, when there were still some rational Republicans out there. You can’t trust them to keep their word. That should be obvious since whenever they’re on television or open their mouth in some other public place all they do is lie.

So, what Durbin is thinking of doing may not be such a big deal on its own, but it speaks volumes about the fact that Democrats in high places don’t appreciate the nature of the historical forces at work in this nation.

Filed in Democrats | | Comments (0)

A look into the future

Wednesday, May 15, 2024

The Biden and Trump campaigns have allegedly agreed to a couple of debates.. The odds of Trump actually debating, after having agreed to do so, are pretty much the same as the odds were that he would testify at his trial, after having said he would do so.

A man who can’t stay awake while on criminal trial, who constantly makes up words, and shows increasing signs of senility is not up to debates, and he will eventually pull out by coming up with some ridiculous way of blaming his refusal to debate on Biden.

The Democrats, who rarely act in concert to push a point, should act in concert to push a point. They should begin now to taunt Trump by claiming that he is going to chicken out of the debates and try to blame Biden. They should keep up the drumbeat.

There would then be two possible outcomes.

Trump would debate and get creamed, with the entire country witnessing his diminished capacity.

Trump would pull out of the debate and, (see above) try to blame Biden, but it would simply be risible, given the fact that he would be doing exactly what the Democrats had predicted.

The only downside to all of the above is that it’s unlikely that the Democrats will do the obvious thing.

Filed in The Very Stable Genius | | Comments (1)

Vermont considers the unthinkable

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

I started this post a few days ago, but we went to Vermont this past weekend and I didn’t have the chance to finish it up there. It’s about Vermont, by the way.

It seems that those aging hippies up there in Vermont just never learn. Look what they want to do:

Vermont is poised to pass a groundbreaking measure forcing major polluting companies to help pay for damages caused by the climate crisis, in a move being closely watched by other states including New York and California.

Modeled after the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund program, which forces companies to pay for toxic waste cleanup, the climate superfund bill would charge major fossil fuel companies doing business within the state billions of dollars for their past emissions.

The measure would make Vermont the first US state to hold fossil fuel companies liable for their planet-heating pollution.

“If you contributed to a mess, you should play a role in cleaning it up,” Elena Mihaly, vice-president of the Conservation Law Foundation’s Vermont chapter, which is campaigning for the bill, said in an interview.

This runs afoul of the law in so many respects that its chances in court are absolutely nil. First of all, it runs counter to the interests of the rich and powerful. The idea of making the conscious producers of climate change pay for the negative effects of their actions is absurd. Sure that’s what basic tort law is all about, but it’s totally different when you’re dealing with huge corporations. Second, it would serve a useful purpose and, particularly if other states follow Vermont’s lead, it would help solve a problem that Republicans refuse to admit exists. Can anyone imagine Alito, Roberts, Kavanaugh, Thomas, Barrett, or Gorsuch upholding such a law? They’re far more likely to find a way to declare the federal Superfund law an unconstitutional taking, considering that it too makes polluters pay to clean up their mess. I mean, really, you can’t get more unAmerican than that.

Filed in Lawyer stuff | | Comments (0)

Trying hard to lose

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Sometimes I think our big name Democrats stay awake at night trying to figure out ways to lose elections. What issues can they ignore that people care about? What arguments can they fail to make that would work? Who can they alienate who would otherwise vote for them?

Case in point discussed in this article, the headline for which reads: “Biden attacks ‘ferocious surge of antisemitism’”. He was speaking to a group at the US Holocaust Memorial Museum.

There has not been a ferocious surge of antisemitism in this country, and it is both factually wrong and politically stupid to imply that the protestors at various universities are anti-Semites. They are speaking out against a government that is committing what is almost universally recognized as a form of genocide. The fact that Jews were themselves the victims of genocide does not in any way justify what the government of Israel is currently doing. There are plenty of Jews in this country that have made it clear that they oppose what the Israeli government is doing, Bernie Sanders being one. Are they anti-Semites?

This really got to me:

“This ancient hatred of Jews didn’t begin with the Holocaust,’’ he said. “It didn’t end with the Holocaust, either.’’

…

But, he added, “there is no place on any campus in America, any place in America, for antisemitism or hate speech or threats of violence of any kind.’’

Biden also denounced attempts to minimize the Hamas attack last October, which killed some 1,200 people in Israel and sparked a war that has killed an estimated 34,000 people in Gaza.

“Now here we are, not 75 years later, but just 71?2 months later, and people are already forgetting,’’ Biden said. “They are already forgetting. That Hamas unleashed this terror. It was Hamas that brutalized Israelis. It was Hamas who took and continues to hold hostages.

I’m sure there are some anti-Semites among the demonstrators, but hate speech and threats of violence have not been a particular feature of the demonstrations. This sounds an awful lot like the Republican lies about Black Lives Matter demonstrations.

Just as it is unfair to equate the government of Israel with all Jews, it is unfair to equate all Palestinians with Hamas, but that is what he is doing by making the “they started it” argument. Indeed, the people of Palestine have less control over Hamas than the citizens of Israel have over their government. Biden is essentially arguing that Israel is entitled to take vengeance on an entire group of people because some of them committed war crimes. The underlying logic is clear: anti-Semitism is bad, but anti-Palestinianism is okay. It’s okay to engage in mass murder of people who did nothing to you if someone of their ethnicity did something you don’t like. Just don’t try that argument in reverse when in comes to Israel.

I suspect that Biden’s actual feelings about what Israel is doing are a bit more nuanced, but for some reason he feels its a political necessity that he engage in this sort of rhetoric. It may come back to haunt him, and could be a factor in the overthrow of democracy here in this country. Those kids that are demonstrating are, most of them, potential Democratic voters, as are those who agree with them. The numbers are not trivial. Biden is pushing them toward voting third party, which means they will functionally be voting for Trump. The upcoming election is too important to throw away be attacking people who are simply calling for an end to a campaign of violence toward an entire group of people.

Filed in Democrats, Foreign Affairs | | Comments (0)